The stigma probably comes from the same place that the reasoning of "why play guitar hero when you could learn to play a real guitar?" came fromSilvanus said:I've really never understood the charge that releasing a level editor is lazy. It's such a nonsensical accusation; level editors are some of the most appreciated and versatile platforms for interacting with a franchise, and Nintendo have more than proven they're willing and capable of making their own fun & functional levels in large numbers. The accusation itself is lazy.
The notion that a well-polished level editor with a global, connected platform is unnecessary because ROM hacks and tribute games exist is also pretty bizarre and nonsensical. You may as well say any professionally-made game is unnecessary because we can make inferior versions ourselves.
There wasn't really much focus on the functionality or... well, the game itself, here. These were mostly just shots at the concept.
What are you talking about? He did quite a few of these numerous times. The first thing he did was poke fun at Nintendo fans, he went on and on about Mario being a rehash, and made a quick shot about the Gamepad despite this being a perfect game for the controller.Johnny Novgorod said:Good review! Didn't expect him to even bother to be honest.
Considering he did nothing out of those things, that list only qualifies as a waste of time.LordLundar said:Doesn't this qualify as cruel and unusual punishment? Or attempted suicide?marioandsonic said:Reviewing Super Mario Maker this week?
Well, better get out my "Yahtzee reviews a Mario game" drinking game checklist:
--Take a shot when he makes fun of Nintendo fans in general
--Take a shot when he says Nintendo rehashes their franchises
--Take a shot when he remarks about the Wii U's hardware being underpowered
--Take a shot when he complains about the Wii U gamepad
---Two shots if the game is 100% compatible with the Wii U Pro controller
Let's see how this goes.
He didn't poke fun at Nintendo fans, he poked fun at Nintendo for forcing them to ditch fan-made levels and pay for something that's been by and large free for quite a while now; he never said Mario is a rehash but rather has devolved along the lines of the first game, and the only thing he said about the Wii U controller was that he hadn't used it in a while.simple64 said:What are you talking about? He did quite a few of these numerous times. The first thing he did was poke fun at Nintendo fans, he went on and on about Mario being a rehash, and made a quick shot about the Gamepad despite this being a perfect game for the controller.Johnny Novgorod said:Good review! Didn't expect him to even bother to be honest.
Considering he did nothing out of those things, that list only qualifies as a waste of time.LordLundar said:Doesn't this qualify as cruel and unusual punishment? Or attempted suicide?marioandsonic said:Reviewing Super Mario Maker this week?
Well, better get out my "Yahtzee reviews a Mario game" drinking game checklist:
--Take a shot when he makes fun of Nintendo fans in general
--Take a shot when he says Nintendo rehashes their franchises
--Take a shot when he remarks about the Wii U's hardware being underpowered
--Take a shot when he complains about the Wii U gamepad
---Two shots if the game is 100% compatible with the Wii U Pro controller
Let's see how this goes.
He compared the fans to children, "devolved along the lines of their first game" (which he went on more than that) is a shot at it being a rehash, and your right about the gamepad thing. He may have not directly stated Mario was a rehash (and of of ideas), but he said Mario is a rehash (and out of ideas).Johnny Novgorod said:He didn't poke fun at Nintendo fans, he poked fun at Nintendo for forcing them to ditch fan-made levels and pay for something that's been by and large free for quite a while now; he never said Mario is a rehash but rather has devolved along the lines of the first game, and the only thing he said about the Wii U controller was that he hadn't used it in a while.simple64 said:What are you talking about? He did quite a few of these numerous times. The first thing he did was poke fun at Nintendo fans, he went on and on about Mario being a rehash, and made a quick shot about the Gamepad despite this being a perfect game for the controller.Johnny Novgorod said:Good review! Didn't expect him to even bother to be honest.
Considering he did nothing out of those things, that list only qualifies as a waste of time.LordLundar said:Doesn't this qualify as cruel and unusual punishment? Or attempted suicide?marioandsonic said:Reviewing Super Mario Maker this week?
Well, better get out my "Yahtzee reviews a Mario game" drinking game checklist:
--Take a shot when he makes fun of Nintendo fans in general
--Take a shot when he says Nintendo rehashes their franchises
--Take a shot when he remarks about the Wii U's hardware being underpowered
--Take a shot when he complains about the Wii U gamepad
---Two shots if the game is 100% compatible with the Wii U Pro controller
Let's see how this goes.
Well that is at least something. I do like nintendo, their first party games are always great. Though i do Hope they're using all their creativity on the next Zelda.CaitSeith said:They added something called the "10 Mario challenge". It's to beat 8 of the levels included in the game by using 10 lives or less (I don't remember the total of levels that it has, but I think they are about 50). Every level you beat is added to your editor, so you can use them to create your levels.Xsjadoblayde said:Editception: Did Nintendo not add any of their home made levels for the game? A mini campaign like little big planet? Stephen Fry? Hugh Laurie??
At least a randomise level create option?
Something?
...
EDIT: And every time a new tool is unlocked, you can play an example of it. It does it 8 times.
EDIT 2: And they brought back theFly SwatterGnat Attack/Coffee Break mini-game from Mario Paint