The other guy seems to be in the same boat as myself, but I suppose I get it because I'm choosing to be slightly less eloquent with my insulting phrases. That's neither here nor there though. I also assume there's a point in there somewhere but I seem to be missing it. As I've repeatedly stated, I do this as a five to ten minute distraction from other things going on. Nothing relaxes me like spewing vitriol all over the place, especially when dealing with people like numb nuts up there who insist on typing statements like this in relation to a direct quote from the dictionary:
"You used a semi-colon in two different ways in the same 'sentence' which could be mistaken for each other which is a poor move stylistically (and I just know you are going to say this but I did not infact mistake your usage of the semi-colons I was simply correcting your poor use of them)"
Because yes, the dictionary is apparently written incorrectly...somehow. Funny thing is, I'd be willing to discuss this in a nicer way, which is just as relaxing, if my good buddy would attempt to actually refute anything stated earlier. He has, to wit, made every effort to side step what was asked and went off on rants only tangentially related to the question/point. Seeing as I'm such a good sport and all, I figured I'd do the same thing but with infinitely less respect. Since that's the first time you've posted in relation to this argument, I'll do you a solid and respond with courtesy.
As you can see, and would have seen had you read my previous posts, that I'm essentially dicking around with all the insults. They're in almost direct proportion to my respect for the person with whom I'm debating. Due to this one ever so important fact, which I previously stated mind you, I really would attempt to avoid re-hashing what I've already said I'm doing and using as some kind of proof that I'm in the wrong.
So, feel free to keep this discussion going by joining on in. A few more posts per week would be welcomed.
