I dislike Zynga.. Their buisness model and behaviour are totally discusting.
No respect for laws and privacy at all..
Hope they burn..
No respect for laws and privacy at all..
Hope they burn..
I'm pretty sure she runs Zynga anwayOnyx Oblivion said:What about Cruella DeVille?
Curse you for ripping off my post, going back in time and posting it before I could!mjc0961 said:Did Tim Langdell get a job at Zynga or something? This sounds an awful lot like that edge ownership nonsense all over again.
world of warcraft.....oh crapFearzone said:^^Dawn of War.
Anyway, would be a bad precedent to set for Minecraft.
When you consider some of the cases over the last year, wouldn't surprise me.Spot1990 said:And yet again people misunderstand a copyright argument.
If Blingville were actually a word, Zynga would have no case. But this is obviously a shameless attempt to leech some of their success.
Someone made a comment about God of War and Gears of War. That's retarded. If someone made a third person hack and slash game exclusive to PS3 called Deity of War, then there'd be an issue. Similarly if someone made a shooter called Cogs of war exclusive for the 360 then there'd be an issue. This copyright of ville only works against copycats who make only social games. It only applies to media that is in direct competition. Adding the suffix "ville" onto another word to make a facebook game is such an obvious and shameless ripoff of Zynga's games. Are people actually retarded enough to believe this means Zynga would just outright own the suffix "ville"?
A douchebag company abusing every bit of leverage they can get to quash their competition?The_root_of_all_evil said:Zynga relying on the law? Isn't that one of the four signs of the apocalypse?