Read the bill before telling me what it says. It doesn't say the words "prove", "assigned", or "birth" at all. It puts no requirement at all on the students to do anything themselves, it is their healthcare providers that are expected to designate biological sex during routine sports physicals. It was written very obviously by people who understand you can't always easily determine sex, because they offered 3 different methods of doing so: genitals, chromosomes, and/or hormone levels. Any one of the three is sufficient. They wrote the bill so that any person without a penis OR without a y-chromosome OR with appropriately low levels of testosterone qualifies as biologically female.a) The bill specifically states that an athlete must prove they were assigned female at birth.
b) The "typical testosterone range" for a healthy teenage girl can be higher than that of many boys of the same age. Again, the bodies of adolescents are different from those of adults.
c) A significant number of women, for various reasons will not fall into the "typical testosterone range". There are very common medical conditions which can affect the hormone balance in the body of a woman or girl who was nonetheless assigned female at birth.
Again, this is just more evidence that the bill was written and supported by people who either lacked even the most basic, 5 seconds on wikipedia understanding of endocrinology, or more likely just didn't care, because it seems to be written on the assumption that you can determine someone's assigned sex at birth from a single hormone test, and (particularly with children) you can't.
Don't believe the lying headlines. Read the bill, and then come back and make your criticisms. I'm sure you'll still have criticisms, but let them be based on what's actually happening, and not on the lies the media is selling you.
I think you need to consider reading the bill before writing about it. Is "your doctor privately determines your eligibility before the sports season even starts" invasive and shaming? To guide your answer, we already do that, it's the point of a sports physical, and in the instance a child isn't physically healthy enough to pass a sports physical, nobody else ever knows it happened to shame them for it.I think you need to consider that there are other ways of being invasive and shaming than demanding someone has their genitals examined.