So, episode 5. I had a chuckle when I spotted the Thanos-Copter. And the Polybius arcade cabinet.
See I thought it was lame because they already referenced the Thanos copter with the helicopter blade in Endgame.So, episode 5. I had a chuckle when I spotted the Thanos-Copter. And the Polybius arcade cabinet.
It's Throg, aka Frog Thor.What was the brief tiny character trapped underground in the first scene transition between the surface and underground bunker of void planet?
An image capture type jobbie with time stamp...
View attachment 4017
It's stuck in a jar! Is it some fan reference thing?
I think it meant to be SPECIFCIALLY only Lokis. It's probably that one good Loki that doesn't like being good and making all the other Loki's stay evilI thought this latest episode was the worst so far. Terrible writing and acting, to the point that I'm embarrassed. The hell was that?
They did absolutely nothing with alternate versions of Loki, and nothing with the concept of a world where other realities are sent to die. Pretty damn disappointing.
Where are all the aliens? Why is everything just earth and also specifically Asgardians? Bleh. Was hoping for more a fun ride of the Marvel universe.
I don't think so. I mean, they pruned a whole WWII battleship and I don't see what that has to do with Loki. Everything else could just be a smokescreen just so specifically Lokis could get fucked over I guess. Whatever, they'd better have a damn good explanation for all of this.I think it meant to be SPECIFCIALLY only Lokis. It's probably that one good Loki that doesn't like being good and making all the other Loki's stay evil
I like giving explanations that don't actually explain anything. But if you must know, Throg is not Thor as a frog.Oh, a Thor Frog, huh...thanks for clearing that up somewhat!
2 episodes later, and im still not really feeling this show.I must admit that Im not really feeling this show, so far.
3 episodes in, and I feel like I am watching this out of habit, more than Im watching it because I want to.
Ah well, the second half of most shows is usually where things pick up
I roughly already knew his origins, but only now am I thinking, damn, Thor just left that dude as a frog? Even if he was a Thor frog, that's fricking cold.I like giving explanations that don't actually explain anything. But if you must know, Throg is not Thor as a frog.
Nah it's not just you. My sister stopped watching after she couldn't take Tom Hiddleston's acting in the first episode, and she actually likes him as an actor. Renslayer and Sylvie are always the worst offenders, followed by Kid Loki who was completely unconvincing. I'm almost certain it's a directing thing, because the acting isn't always bad but inconsistent.Also, is it just me, or are there moments when the acting is just really bad? It just really stood out to me, in the last episode.
I wouldn't say I feel the acting itself is that bad so much as I think the script is dull or maybe like Bob said it's a directorial issue. Yeah I was expecting Kid Loki to have at least a little more to say. I mean he's still "talks too much" Loki. This last episode especially just felt very single take whatever just get the lines done.I roughly already knew his origins, but only now am I thinking, damn, Thor just left that dude as a frog? Even if he was a Thor frog, that's fricking cold.
Nah it's not just you. My sister stopped watching after she couldn't take Tom Hiddleston's acting in the first episode, and she actually likes him as an actor. Renslayer and Sylvie are always the worst offenders, followed by Kid Loki who was completely unconvincing. I'm almost certain it's a directing thing, because the acting isn't always bad but inconsistent.
Oh it's definitely a writing issue as well. But I feel in general that Sylvie and Renslayer's actors just don't bring anything to the table.I wouldn't say I feel the acting itself is that bad so much as I think the script is dull or maybe like Bob said it's a directorial issue.
To be fair part of it is the nature of a tv show vs a full funded Marvel movie. In Femki's case, meaning no offense to the actress, if she was going to continue on after the show and have cameos in movies they would have hired a bigger named actress. Same with I dunno, Sam's sister Sarah, or Agatha. These are small side characters in already side tv shows with side plots that are basically just the opening credits to the next Marvel movies.Oh it's definitely a writing issue as well. But I feel in general that Sylvie and Renslayer's actors just don't bring anything to the table.
Everything on Disney+ so far though has been premium TV. If this was a CW show, I wouldn't have batted an eye at Sylvie. But her sheer lack of charisma, especially alongside Tom Hiddleston and Owen Wilson, stands out. I just genuinely dislike her, not even for her actions or her motivations. Just because she's a bore to watch, she adds absolutely nothing to show despite being a main character.To be fair part of it is the nature of a tv show vs a full funded Marvel movie. In Femki's case, meaning no offense to the actress, if she was going to continue on after the show and have cameos in movies they would have hired a bigger named actress. Same with I dunno, Sam's sister Sarah, or Agatha. These are small side characters in already side tv shows with side plots that are basically just the opening credits to the next Marvel movies.
Femki's actresses doesn't have to give it her all, she has a few dozen lines in 5 episodes of a Disney+ series, not only not about her, but specifically about Tomki causing the multiverse.