See this is my confusion, I have seen plenty of youtube videos of people playing the game and it seems stable enough?
The thing about those compilation of bugs on those videos is that those are like selectivily edited because for all I know those bugs don't happen ever 2 minutes or something.
The fact that they happen at all is the problem. Enough users playing a game and you are bound to see bugs here and there, but when EVERY player is reporting or experiencing bugs, that's a good indication that there is a serious problem with the game as a whole.
For example I've played nearly 250 hours of the Final Fantasy 7 remake, never in that entire playtime have i crashed or experienced anything other than a couple wierd animations with NPC characters. However people have experienced crashing and stuttering with the game. Which means that there are possible bugs with the game but are so rare that the vast majority of players isn't likely to experience them, and it's more likely that the players seeing these issues more likely have dying conoles than anything being wrong with the game itself.
But when you have something like Fallout 76, in which nobody can play for any period of time and not get bombarded with bugs and glitches, is proof that it isn't any given player's PC settings or dying console, but actually a problem with a poorly made game.
Battlefield seems to be somewhere in the middle. It's not Fallout 76 bad, but it isn't good either.