The "restrictions on adults" mean that the kids can't get gender affirming care of any kind.Well, you see, you made up the "socially" part wholesale, and then applied restrictions on adults to the children themselves. So, perhaps I should ask, what are you lying for?
All you have are particularly pathetic semantic arguments, all to defend a criminal AG ignoring medical advice so he can hurt kids.
Just a while thread on why that order's bullshit. But hey, I'm sure to have a pithy comeback about a misplaced apostrophe
Making a *lot* of assumptions right now, specifically the thought that the city said "clear that area, I don't care how many non-violent protestors you have to brutalize to do it"Correct. If you want to blame someone for the result, you blame the people who gave that order and provided the means. You wouldn't prosecute an assembly line worker for installing faulty parts in a car, you would prosecute the company. It's different if the police are brutalizing people in violation of policy, then they ought to be prosecuted, but if someone is told "you clear the crowd, you use bean bag rounds to do so" and then try and put them in prison for firing bean bag rounds when ordered to clear a crowd, that is wrong.