It is literally impossible to teach literature, art, or drama without "pushing anything".Again, pushing anything is bad. I don't get why you think that I feel pushing gay stuff is now a bridge too far, it always was.
It is literally impossible to teach literature, art, or drama without "pushing anything".Again, pushing anything is bad. I don't get why you think that I feel pushing gay stuff is now a bridge too far, it always was.
If that were true though they wouldn't get so stupidly mad over Disney (potentially) having a gay character in their movie, or Marvel having a superhero movie with a female lead who doesn't smile enough.As I've said before, conservatives do not engage with media. They only consume it.
Eh, let her have her little moment before the world forgets about her again.Can Amy Schumer shut the fuck up now?
No, to point out something obvious here but maybe he's just not into it?Okay then, so what's the problem with Disney "pushing" gayness (which they're not but for sake of argument let's say they are)? They've pushed fairy tale princesses, straight romance, good vs. evil, and 'never give up/always do your best/keep dreaming' for years. And all of this was so they could sell you shit. Why is gayness suddenly a bridge too far, or a sign that their "creativity" is now compromised?
Why is this 'pushing the gay agenda' and an interview proving it such a gotcha?
Be careful ones doesn't become the 2nd Brecht when doing it though.It is literally impossible to teach literature, art, or drama without "pushing anything".
I'm sorry but:If that were true though they wouldn't get so stupidly mad over Disney (potentially) having a gay character in their movie, or Marvel having a superhero movie with a female lead who doesn't smile enough.
They engage with the media, but only the part that they can squeeze rage fuel out of to flame up their (fan) base.
Read the bills/laws, none of them say anything about banning CRT at all. John Oliver's team couldn't even read the bills they are talking about, pretty sad.Yes, zero states have banned it. Absolutely zero conservative politicians writing bills and voting, shouting loudly about how they are banning CRT in schools
Is your defense for conservatives pushing these bills truly that every conservative politician was lying? Because John Oliver pointed out that they weren't actually banning CRT, because no grade schools are actually teaching CRT.
(Incidently, Rufo's blatant lie was that there isn't an agenda. It was just a minute long video of an executime talking about how she liked putting tiny amounts of gay stuff into backgrounds. That's not an agenda)
...hey quick question, do you know how stories work?
I talked about the agenda in video games in pushing white male protagonist with short hair and even posted that infamous pic of all the protagonists looking the same. I know that when Heavenly Sword was revealed at E3, it was the only game shown with a woman protagonist, it's on the special features of the game IIRC. And I know Naughty Dog had to fight to get Ellie on the cover of TLOU. I think, again, IIRC that Elizabeth wasn't allowed on the cover of Bioshock Infinite. It was wrong then and wrong now, I don't get how I'm saying anything different than before.Because you're bringing it up in this very thread. And because the '[insert whatever] agenda' was never a thing till gay people started getting more (positive) exposure in fiction. People constantly talked about tropes in movies, but as soon as gay characters started showing up it became an "agenda", signaling the supposed nefarious attempt by SJWs to ruin movies and games by putting non-straight, non-white, and non-cis people in them.
Also, any story with a message or theme of any kind has it there because the writers or whoever was in charge pushed for it to be there. Stories don't write themselves afterall. You think movies like The Terminator, Mad Max, First Blood, Alien, Aliens, and Robocop weren't pushing anything? You think those themes just happened accidentally without the writers not expressly pushing for them?
I'm for basically all the social programs/policies of say Denmark. How much more progressive do you want someone to be to be for the "cause"? I say you need to vote 3rd party because democrats aren't going to deliver even something that should be as basic as public healthcare so why vote for them? Just because I don't like democrats doesn't mean I'm not progressive. You do know I don't like republicans either right?And this is why nobody believes your claims that you're a progressive: you have yet to stand up for a single progressive cause and just keep pushing to enforce the status quo like every other tradcon.
I said people outside of the creators shouldn't push anything.It is literally impossible to teach literature, art, or drama without "pushing anything".
Yeah, this doesn't make sense.No, to point out something obvious here but maybe he's just not into it?
Different strokes for different folks and it's kind of weird to me the seeming idea of "You must support it because gay people" when surely people should support the thing they enjoy based on enjoying it?
Did you know that the word slavery or slave is not used in the US constitution.Read the bills/laws, none of them say anything about banning CRT at all. John Oliver's team couldn't even read the bills they are talking about, pretty sad.
I dunno, I've seen LBGT arguments to ban these because they re-enforce hetero-normative stereotypes.I.e. your support just means they aren't cancelled for being gay etc. I support RomComs existing because why the fuck would I want to ban it
Wow, that joke is not funny. And I don't mean that it's tasteless: it's just really weak.Can Amy Schumer shut the fuck up now?
So, every conservative clip is of a conservative blatantly lying about crt being taught in schools and blatantly lying about how they want to ban crt in schools, but John Oliver is in the wrong for...posting clips about them saying that?Read the bills/laws, none of them say anything about banning CRT at all. John Oliver's team couldn't even read the bills they are talking about, pretty sad.
I mean, a good chunk of them celebrate *really* creepy behaviorsI dunno, I've seen LBGT arguments to ban these because they re-enforce hetero-normative stereotypes.
because normal behavior is boring and it would make a shitty movie. Can you imagine a movie about awkward tinder dm's and fucking a stranger on the first blind date, then getting ghosted? It would be like 15 minutes long and probably x rated..........actually i think i've seen that one on the Hub.I mean, a good chunk of them celebrate *really* creepy behaviors
To ban them? Maybe have some diversity would be niceI dunno, I've seen LBGT arguments to ban these because they re-enforce hetero-normative stereotypes.
...uh...so are the choices really between stalking someone at work vs tinder hookups?because normal behavior is boring and it would make a shitty movie. Can you imagine a movie about awkward tinder dm's and fucking a stranger on the first blind date, then getting ghosted? It would be like 15 minutes long and probably x rated..........actually i think i've seen that one on the Hub.
And you don't see any correlation between people trying to fight and speak out against the onslaught white male protagonists from back then with people trying to fight against the onslaught of straight male protagonists in games and movies today?I talked about the agenda in video games in pushing white male protagonist with short hair and even posted that infamous pic of all the protagonists looking the same. I know that when Heavenly Sword was revealed at E3, it was the only game shown with a woman protagonist, it's on the special features of the game IIRC. And I know Naughty Dog had to fight to get Ellie on the cover of TLOU. I think, again, IIRC that Elizabeth wasn't allowed on the cover of Bioshock Infinite. It was wrong then and wrong now, I don't get how I'm saying anything different than before.
Into what? I didn't even mention a title or a genre. I didn't even say 'you must support it because there's gay people in it'. Unless you're equating gayness to a genre or the overall quality of a product, which would be weird (but not surprising in the slightest).No, to point out something obvious here but maybe he's just not into it?
Different strokes for different folks and it's kind of weird to me the seeming idea of "You must support it because gay people" when surely people should support the thing they enjoy based on enjoying it?
Yes, I know. The creators are not going to be teaching their own content, are they?I said people outside of the creators shouldn't push anything.