We're at the point in the culture where they can't fill driving positions with 6-digit salaries and training provided because not enough candidates can pass the drug test. Expect a realignment of priorities in the near future.
Utah creates 5 person commission to regulate one trans girl playing sports
- Thread starter TheMysteriousGX
- Start date
If you were trying to seem vaguely menacing, 10/10. If you were trying for a cogent point, -4/10.
Good, because that's not why the trucking industry is fucked.
Turn out the problem is capitalism
A majority of population resents it?
A majority of the population do not care about either side of the culture war. Generally, they are supportive transrights
As to think its a sine wave. That's a no from me too. There was a LOT of conservatives movements that dominates social spheres in the 60/70s. Otherwise Civil Rights and the ERA would have been a shoe in, along with medicare for all and drug legalisation
And how now conservatives are weirdly obsessed with furries. It's definitely got nothing to do with the fact that conservatives are a bunch of hyper repressed weirdos who think anything besides missionary position is social degradation.
A vast majority want trans people not do be harassed or assaulted.
A thin majority would let them use whatever bathroom they want.
A shrinking minority want to open women's sports to trans women.
Almost nobody wants a pride parade song telling children about non-binary dolphins in Blues Clues. That's what people resent.
You're right that people don't really care about the culture war. But that doesn't mean they have no opinion when you shove it down their throats. If anything, it's the people who don't care that get most annoyed by the activism.
Multiple Civil Rights Acts did pass, the ERA was first imagined in that time period, Medicare was first implemented in that period, and most of the drug laws on the books now weren't there until the 80s. What are you talking about? It's like you're trying to prove my point.
And it never occurs to you that people might resent conservatives' constant shoving culture war bullshit down our throats? You really think it only cuts one way?
They passed with heavy opposition. It was not a sure thing by any stretch of the imagination. That was the point. Pay attention.
https://nordot.app/889668371944325120?c=592622757532812385
Florida is taking, "Don't say gay," a step further. They've withdrawn from the CDC's biannual Youth Risk Behavior Survey. So far the state has offered no explanation, no comment, nothing.
Florida is taking, "Don't say gay," a step further. They've withdrawn from the CDC's biannual Youth Risk Behavior Survey. So far the state has offered no explanation, no comment, nothing.
It's worth noting that the survey includes questions about sexual orientation and gender identity. Kind of crosses the T, doesn't it?
Because social expectations are literally the opposite, and the kid wants to go against them.
Why would police be using something that's not descriptive to identify someone? It would be like describing Michael Jackson as black because his ID says he's black or someone has long hair in their ID pic and now they have short hair. Bouncers already discriminate, you act like a bouncer needs an ID to figure out someone is trans.
How are police going to harass trans people because of sex on IDs? Police harassment is like pulling over more black people because they're black using, you know, their eyes to see. Unless you're going to say the police are going to remember some trans person and the car they drive after they see their ID and then purposefully harass them because they can do that without checking their ID as there's "clues" to figure it out without an ID.
Like I said, men continue growing more after puberty than women, thus Mugsy Bogues or Shaq would almost certainly be shorter if they were women. Height matters in quite a few sports.
Of course, anything naturally occurring shouldn't get anyone banned. Regardless of trans women, you would still have to screen for testosterone because men and women can take testosterone to gain advantages. I don't see why trans women would cause said testing, regardless if they did indeed started because of that, it should've always been screened for anyway.
I asked what does it matter if it's because someone wants to transition or do it purposefully for advantage because said advantage is the same regardless. Advantage does care about motive.
I listed a few already; taller, bigger heart, bigger lungs.
Your argument is completely disingenuous as sex doesn't matter in marriage but sex matters in sports. It's why sports are separated by sex and always will be. I don't get how it's a semantic argument at all.
I've explained how sex is useful for doctors in emergency situations. And if you want gender to be on the ID instead, then what does that matter because you can identify as any gender you want any given day.
I did have a typo in that "(if the government didn't recognize marriage, the whole debate would've been a thing in the 1st place) " as it should be 'wouldn't have been'. If the government didn't recognize marriage then gay marriage wouldn't have been an issue because there would be no advantages gay people were missing out on and they could just create their own religion (if traditional ones wouldn't allow for gay marriage) to be able to get married if they wanted to. It would be like having a tax break for people who were baptized and those that aren't baptized and don't believe in that religion are disadvantaged. The Obergefel decision is over the 14th amendment because everyone having equal opportunity, and that's why gay marriage not being recognized was creating inequality. If marriage was recognized the same as baptism (no recognition), there would be no inequality present.
That would mean no tax incentives for married couples, visitation rights at hospitals would be thornier, questions of inheritance, and a whole bunch of other downstream effects. No, the government not recognizing marriage in any secular capacity is just a stupid idea. Also, "create their own religion?" Atheists can just fuck right off and die, huh? Nice to know what you actually think of us. Marriage is not just a religious concept, and if you don't understand that, maybe you shouldn't get married.
You haven't seen very many trans people then. Or heard the stories of butch women getting harassed and attacked for not looking femme enough
Lmao, you have a distinct lack of imagination/ability to look up anything, huh. (EDIT: just realized this, but couldn't a medical doctor use those "clues" to do the medical shit you're super concerned about without fucking up somebody's ability to buy beer?)
Whether or not some hypothetical person might've been shorter in a different life is irrelevant to claiming a height advantage in the real world. "Men are taller on average" does not mean that any individual person then necessarily has an advantage. Mugsy Bouges, celebrated cis man, does not have a height advantage on real actual people by virtue of being a dude. Trends do not apply to individuals.
Besides, this is fixed by giving kids hormones, a thing that I'm guessing you are *super* against
Well, it does, regardless of if you see why. Cis women are being banned for having too much natural testosterone
All things modifiable by hormones and steroids, seeing as we modify them with steroids and hormones
My argument is that states have never banned a gay man from his ability to get married, just like states have never banned a trans girl from playing sports, as per your argument.
Incidentally, Florida wants to ban trans children from life:
That is super not how self ID works, not least of which is that ID takes 4-6 weeks to get mailed.
Last edited:
The battle cry of the anti-trans bigots: "We can always tell!"
Spoiler: no, they really can't
Yep
Legit nobody actually cares (except those that are told that trans are bad) and they dont even know when they are using the toilet. Some countries dont even have genders on their bathrooms.
Again, legit, they general public does not care one way or the other. It's definitely not shrinking
Again, nobody actually cares. Many of the song and themes on Sesame Street, Paw Patrol, Peppa Pig are steep in conservative hetero traditional propaganda. It's normal, as things become the tradition, for it to join the propaganda
Do you understand the concept of shoe in? Like it would have been easy? CRA did NOT pass easily. In fact, there was a lot of bloodshed over it. Riots that make BLM look like a calming cook out. And then there's the fact that CRA was detoothed to make sure it didn't actually do that much
When they lost that, they turned to the ERA, hence that act losing.
Yep, Medicare was implemented. And they have spent the next 50 years trying to get it to work because it was broken by those who opposed it at the start (many of them Dems). And by broken here, I actually mean not designed to work. (I wonder if you are noticing a trend here...)
The war of drug start in '71. It just continued into the '80s because it was a politically scoring tool. It takes a long time for movements to form. MAGA was relatively quick in the general scheme on things, but the base of Qanon etc have been going from decades. It didnt just spring up. Neither did Regean war on drugs
I would suggest that you look up the term transinvestigation. No, it seems that figuring out if someone is trans is generally pretty hard, at least stated by those in Q
Here's a primer to get you started and then go down a massive Qhole
I've been trying to find out what specifically got a bunch of Maths textbook banned. Here's what some publishes are guessing about their own books
DeSantis and hosts critiques go for about 3 mins before getting to the publishers stance
DeSantis and hosts critiques go for about 3 mins before getting to the publishers stance
And it terrifies them, because they might hit on that hottie whose pipe comes out instead of goes in and then lol ur gay.
I do, but your comment was so dumb, I skipped past the obvious and gave you a second chance.
What sort of person looks back at a time when a bunch of popular liberal ideas were invented and passed and thinks "it doesn't count as a liberal moment in history if they didn't pass everything super easily"? What is the logic you're trying to employ? There has never been a moment in American governance when any faction could do whatever they wanted without opposition. Your argument applied evenly would suggest that there has never been a moment in time where one side had a meaningful lead. That's absolute nonsense.