And what if there hasn't been enough races to tell if it's winning a disproportionate amount of races? Do you just let the better car race until there's enough races to prove it has an advantage? You think the other teams would be very happy with that decision?
That's literally how it works in racing. We didn't ban the NASA designed super suits until *after* they dominated the water
www.swimmingworldmagazine.com
Once again, I hate to tell you this, but Google is not a dictionary. It sources its definitions from the OED, which is likely to have a larger definition in full for both 'trans' and 'woman'.
Not really sure why you're saying this...? Everyone here acknowledges 'transgender' refers to gender.
Funny how you ignored the question of what the other teams would think. Was only one country allowed to wear the suits and no one else?That's literally how it works in racing. We didn't ban the NASA designed super suits until *after* they dominated the water
One Decade Later, Do We Miss the Full-body Tech Suit?
One decade later, are we still saying good riddance to the fastest swimsuit banned from the swimming world: the full-body tech suit?
You get basically the same definitions at Merriam-Webster as well. So you think there's some Google conspiracy in not showing you the whole definition? Again, I'm just using words as they are defined.
Literally the second definition of "female" in Merriam Webster is this: "having a gender identity that is the opposite of male".
No, I merely think that if you insist on quoting definitions, you probably shouldn't be using Google paraphrases of a dictionary that is inaccessible unless we pay money....you also get the word "woman".
And the 1st definition is again?
The first definition relates to sex.
Most definitions turned up by Google are shorter than you'd expect from a respected dictionary, so there's certainly editing that occurs. There's also the fact that it defines multiple-word terms (like trans woman), which dictionaries tend not to do.
In the definition you quoted, "woman" does not solely come after the term "identifies as". It also says, very simply, "a transgender woman". A very simple adjective-subject sentence. Someone who is transgender. And a woman.
But sex is the main definition. And what is so bad about using that as your definition of the word?
Only the rich countries with access to the manufacturing tech. Was only one team allowed a transgender swimmer?
What evidence do we have that Google employed a load of linguists and lexicographers?
Nothing is wrong with using it. But you can't decide which definition to use, exclude all others, and then claim the dictionary supports you. They all apply.
Oh, so it does, actually! Happily, the very first two words of that definition is "A woman".
... and you also get the word woman. The definition is describing the hypothetical person as a woman.
So no countries were banned from these suits then... Swimming isn't a team sport... And you do not know that...
And looking up the definition for car nets you different definitions but the car (that people drive everywhere) and the other definitions of cars are obviously different things much like the definitions for woman.
Right, yes, different definitions are different. Obviously, or they... would just all be one definition.
www.merriam-webster.com
Those words literally are not in the definition. "Woman" is.
Mans so keen to dunk on people about how clever he is. "Swimming is not a team sport" forget relays exist AND that Olympic swimmers are designated as teams? Hence "The teams which could afford the suits".
I'm stuck on the banned swimsuits somehow not being banned. Utterly baffled about what argument he thinks he's making
Damn, another thing that wouldn't happen happening?
