You're making it more confusing than it has to be.It's confusing, okay? It's fucking confusing!
You're making it more confusing than it has to be.It's confusing, okay? It's fucking confusing!
It's not rules lawyering, It's language lawyering.This sort of obsessive online rules lawyering is why a lot of LGBT+ folks are just going back to being queers. The cishets keep trying to break up the acronym and the younger queers are falling for it.
Same difference from the same type of jackasses.It's not rules lawyering, It's language lawyering
Oh look more insubstantial anger and as hominem pretending to be some kind of cogent response.Same difference from the same type of jackasses.
Good to know you like being wrong as always without actually admitting it and saying it. Keep working on it. I'm sure you'll do better next time.Oh look more insubstantial anger and as hominem pretending to be some kind of cogent response.
Keep trying maybe you'll actually be able to counter 1 point I make at some point with an actual argument rather than bluster of bile.
If I'm so wrong you'd be able to argue and prove it with actual points.Good to know you like being wrong as always without actually admitting it and saying it. Keep working on it. I'm sure you'll do better next time.
Dude, don't give him what he wants. Put his ass on ignore and move on.Good to know you like being wrong as always without actually admitting it and saying it. Keep working on it. I'm sure you'll do better next time.
Said by the guy that likes to constantly goal post, use what about his own, and lacks the actual empathy to care for about anyone other than himself. The usual bullcrap from the likes of you.If I'm so wrong you'd be able to argue and prove it with actual points.
Instead you cast aspersions and throw insults.
It's an amazing show of illusory superiority on your part
I do. But when somebody says something that ignorant and untrue, I will call them out. I have nothing left to say to him, because he's so not worth it at this point. Never was.Dude, don't give him what he wants. Put his ass on ignore and move on.
Same goes for Slytherin. Piece of shit house for piece of shit people. There's exactly one canon example and exception to the rule, and unlike real life he happens to be a liar and a coward who's directly responsible for the rise of the Slytherin equivalent of Hitler and would rather do nothing to oppose him later.
Got sorted into Gryffindor, actually.If you got sorted into Slytherin in one of those online personality tests and this is why you're so defensive about it,
I got put into Ravenclaw. Why didn't you also get the bird one? HAWKi?Got sorted into Gryffindor, actually.
Well, for all you know, I could just be lion about it.I got put into Ravenclaw. Why didn't you also get the bird one? HAWKi?
The goal isn't moving, you're just licking the ball and saying it should count at this point.Said by the guy that likes to constantly goal post, use what about his own, and lacks the actual empathy to care for about anyone other than himself. The usual bullcrap from the likes of you.
How is it ignorant and untrue for me to say I wouldn't want to emotionally blackmail people I consider friends into joining a boycott I supported?I do. But when somebody says something that ignorant and untrue, I will call them out. I have nothing left to say to him, because he's so not worth it at this point. Never was.
And there's one little word that can stop an accidental misgendering turning into a massive headache: "Sorry".Strange, then, that a lot of people are able to use people's preferred pronouns and it's not a problem. Even stranger, they don't have to go out of their way to cause problems for others who have preferred pronouns not the ones society gave them at birth either. Weird.
The hole of you not being able to provide more than one canon example of Slytherin not being a complete waste of oxygen, because they were written as a bunch of racist purists who're supposed to exemplify cunning and ambition yet all of them are uniformly portrayed as petty bullies or deranged followers?Hogwarts Legacy - Whimsical Wizardry
It's always that and "Merlin was a Slytherin"! Merlin, the one character Rowling does not own and is essentially a throwaway footnote in a book. Slytherins are otherwise uniformly characterized as evil and/or assholes. Um, Albus and Severus? Leta? That's not including Slytherins with...forums.escapistmagazine.com
We've been down this rabbit hole.
Everybody is more of a Hufflepuff. Hufflepuff is the 'Other' option vs. three extremely limited and reductive personality traits. One of them being merely a douchebag.Was actually surprised as well - I'd actually say that in real life, I'm more of a Hufflepuff.
No, more the fact that what you call canon is far smaller than what's actually canon, meaning that like I said back then, it's a waste of time to discuss it.The hole of you not being able to provide more than one canon example of Slytherin not being a complete waste of oxygen, because they were written as a bunch of racist purists who're supposed to exemplify cunning and ambition yet all of them are uniformly portrayed as petty bullies or deranged followers?