This statement tells me you don't even read this forum, more or less respectable news sources.In my State, there was a train derailment that fucked over a town due to the Trump admin's deregulation of the logistics industry.
This statement tells me you don't even read this forum, more or less respectable news sources.In my State, there was a train derailment that fucked over a town due to the Trump admin's deregulation of the logistics industry.
Are we assuming he's talking about that train derailment?This statement tells me you don't even read this forum, more or less respectable news sources.
Yes.Are we assuming he's talking about that train derailment?
Probably should wait to find out. In 2022 the us averaged over 2 derailments a day with half carrying hazardous materials. You, know because America is a 3rd world plutocratic shithole.Yes.
And?Probably should wait to find out. In 2022 the us averaged over 2 derailments a day with half carrying hazardous materials. You, know because America is a 3rd world plutocratic shithole.
This statement tells me you don't even read this forum, more or less respectable news sources.
He's referring to the fact that the train in Ohio that derailed did not meet the criteria to be covered by the ECP mandate.Transportation Developments in the Trump Administration's First 100 Days | Insights | Holland & Knight
The Trump Administration's first 100 days have seen transportation-related developments involving Maritime, Motor Carriers, Rail and Antitrust.www.hklaw.com
Additionally, that mandate was appealed and held off before Trump was even president, largely because they passed semi-redundant regulations immediately after setting that mandate which required a new cost benefit analysis in light of the new changes.He's referring to the fact that the train in Ohio that derailed did not meet the criteria to be covered by the ECP mandate.
How the fuck does having to be on a liquid diet mean you have to have fruit juices?You can impotently shriek all you want. The facts don't care about your ego.
I just had surgery and am on a liquid diet that includes fruit juices. Maybe you're not as smart as you think you are.
What important detail is it missing?Ugh. That sentence is kind of true in ways, but misses far too much important detail.
Because, as stated, fruit juice contains various nutrients and antioxidants that may be beneficial, and when drunk in modest quantities does not pose a significant issue in calorie consumption. Thus context is king, and it depends on what the circumstances of public health are. Stop blabbing absurd and inflexible absolutism.
Really, really, do not start trying to tell me about Alzheimer's, because that is very much in my speciality area. This "type 3 diabetes" was invented and fashionable about 10-15 years, but has gained little traction since. Obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease are significant risk factors for Alzheimer's, and thus excessive sugar consumption will be an issue. However, sugar is not the main cause of Alzheimer's.
Honestly that's just about the most childish thing anyone's said to me on these forums in a long time.
Sugar is fine, in moderation.
That's a solid breakfast of good foods. Although normal bacon isn't nutritionally bad for you, it's the nitrates that lead to cancers. If bacon was more naturally produced, it would be perfectly fine for you.Sugar on it's own is broken down rapidly. Combined with a fiber or a protein source slows it down.
Ag3ma literally explained this. It doesn't have to be the fiber of the fruit. Just any fiber. Protein also causes a similar effect. Which is why the sugar of fruit and the sugar of milk don't cause the same insulin spike. A breakfast for me could consist of turkey bacon, scrambled eggs and some kind of veg like tenderstem brocoli. I don't particularly enjoy juice personally but if I were to add a glass to my breakfast all of the protein and fiber I'm eating will also minimise the insulin spike.
You don't know what you're talking about, you come in swinging dick acting like you know better and that's why everyone thinks you're a clown. You have come to these conclusions about breakfast, carbs, juice and whatever other bullshit and nothing will change your mind because as far as your concerned you're just the smartest little boy in the whole wide world. At one stage, pages ago, you asked me how can people lose fat without ketosis because you don't even have a rudimentary knowledge of concepts like lipolysis. Now you're going to go google a bunch of shit and pretend that never happened and pretend like you do understand those concepts and have all along. It is fine to not understand shit. Your problem is you don't understand shit, form faulty views on incorrect, incomplete or just straight misunderstood information then pull a Stephen Crowder "[insert bullshit here], change my mind" . You are not a smart person. You are an incurious, cocky child.
Like this is literally @Ag3ma's field. This is what they know. I'm just a BSc. Student in Strength and Conditioning who does a little sports nutrition. And once again I would never dream of speaking in the absolute terms you do because outside of giving general advice and tips I know that giving dietary advice is outside my scope of practice. I am more qualified to speak on nutrition than you are but would never try to speak authoritatively on the subject the way you do.
Google lipolysis and energy balance. I'm done talking to you like you're an adult. If you don't understand these very basic concepts for weight/fatloss you really need to stop pretending you know shit about fuck because you just make yourself look more and more thick everytime you type. I would almost guarantee that most people who have lost weight have done so without being in a state of ketosis. When I go on a cut I lose fat while consuming about 300g of carbs a day.Ketosis is just the state of burning fat for energy instead of carbs so how would you lose fat without doing that?
I said "includes" not "have to." That's some stupid bullshit you made up. Don't make shit up dude.How the fuck does having to be on a liquid diet mean you have to have fruit juices?
There's an explanation above already.What important detail is it missing?
Well, no. Most guidelines give limits for "added sugars". This means various forms of additive sweetening agents (like if you put a teaspoon of sugar in your coffee). It does not apply to the natural sugar content of regular foods. Secondly, guidelines vary, but the "added sugar" is usually in the region of 25-30g (~100-120kcal). 200ml regular orange juice has about 60 kcal, so it's not above your daily recommendation even of added sugar.Like an 8oz of fruit juice contains more sugar than you're supposed to have in a day. How is that healthy telling people to drink it for vitamin c or whatever? Why not just fill up Peeps with vitamin c, that doesn't make Peeps good to eat because you put vitamin c in it.
Sure. And there are ways to tackle that. For instance, in many places that have used them, sugar taxes appear to have worked in cutting down sugar consumption.PEOPLE DON'T INGEST SUGAR IN MODERATION
Well... I think there's an issue here. As far as I can tell, the so-called "nitrite-free" bacon you can buy uses stuff like for instance concentrated celery extract. However, the celery extract works for making bacon because it has... nitrites. It is totally unclear to me whether this is an improvement, or whether you're just paying more to get cancer from celery-sourced nitrites instead of industrially-produced nitrites.That's a solid breakfast of good foods. Although normal bacon isn't nutritionally bad for you, it's the nitrates that lead to cancers. If bacon was more naturally produced, it would be perfectly fine for you.
You're telling me!People don't know what's good and bad for them.
I already tried explaining that when the food pyramid says to limit fat intake it meant "pure" fat sources like oils. When you account for how well represented things like dairy, meat, fish and nuts are then you see recommendations do say that fat should make up a reasonable percentage of your calorie intake. But obviously of you account for fat being much higher in calories then obviously, gram for gram, it's going to be less represented than protein or carbs. He just said no he doesn't think so and continued insisting that health guidelines say not to eat fat.Well, no. Most guidelines give limits for "added sugars".
So you're just mad that ketosis is defined wrong on the internet? When did I say carbs themselves are bad? How is the advice of eating REAL food bad advice? That's literally all I've said to do.Google lipolysis and energy balance. I'm done talking to you like you're an adult. If you don't understand these very basic concepts for weight/fatloss you really need to stop pretending you know shit about fuck because you just make yourself look more and more thick everytime you type. I would almost guarantee that most people who have lost weight have done so without being in a state of ketosis. When I go on a cut I lose fat while consuming about 300g of carbs a day.
Ok, fruit juice isn't quite as bad as I thought but it's still not what I'd call good either.There's an explanation above already.
Well, no. Most guidelines give limits for "added sugars". This means various forms of additive sweetening agents (like if you put a teaspoon of sugar in your coffee). It does not apply to the natural sugar content of regular foods. Secondly, guidelines vary, but the "added sugar" is usually in the region of 25-30g (~100-120kcal). 200ml regular orange juice has about 60 kcal, so it's not above your daily recommendation even of added sugar.
Sure. And there are ways to tackle that. For instance, in many places that have used them, sugar taxes appear to have worked in cutting down sugar consumption.
But "don't drink fruit juice" isn't a particularly powerful way to help prevent diabetes, especially considering fruit juice is not particularly problematic in terms of insulin resistance, as relatively little of the sugar in fruit tends to be glucose.
Well... I think there's an issue here. As far as I can tell, the so-called "nitrite-free" bacon you can buy uses stuff like for instance concentrated celery extract. However, the celery extract works for making bacon because it has... nitrites. It is totally unclear to me whether this is an improvement, or whether you're just paying more to get cancer from celery-sourced nitrites instead of industrially-produced nitrites.
No, nitrites are what are necessary but nitrates break down into nitrites over time. You really only use nitrates for dry cures these days, especially ones that require a long hang such as salami and the like.it seems like nitrates are needed regardless.
You're a child. Ketosis isn't defined wrong on the internet you just don't understand energy balance and misunderstood Ketosis as it is defined on the Internet. So now rather than just admit you don't know what you're talking about the entire Internet has to have gotten it wrong because there is no possible way that you just don't understand something. You're a fuckin weirdo mate.So you're just mad that ketosis is defined wrong on the internet?