Nothing. Just his usual false claims and bullshit.What were you looking at?
Nothing. Just his usual false claims and bullshit.What were you looking at?
I googled "Gaza Life expectancy", and scrolled til I found one that gave a number for just Gaza, here:What were you looking at? I went by Wikipedia.
I don't think you're even from Detroit.Nothing. Just his usual false claims and bullshit.
There are those positing just how much many people actually wanted this.Netanyahu is one of those factions who doesn't want piece.
I would say the baby thing is unlikely, since stories like that are old war propaganda, meaning every single conflict has those exact stories. We got it for iraq, we got it for germany. The old style story is either babies being thrown into the air and being impaled on bayonets' or swords but its the same thing.Yes there are, no there aren't, yes there are, no there aren't. It's something I was perfectly aware could and has happened but this is my first time seeing it myself
It also happens for real occasionally, though. Wouldn't be too surprised if babies were murdered by ether or both sides here.I would say the baby thing is unlikely, since stories like that are old war propaganda, meaning every single conflict has those exact stories. We got it for iraq, we got it for germany. The old style story is either babies being thrown into the air and being impaled on bayonets' or swords but its the same thing.
Maybe, but I think its one of those things there they are more likely to be collateral damage rather then deliberately targeted, but I suppose it also depends on what we mean by baby.It also happens for real occasionally, though. Wouldn't be too surprised if babies were murdered by ether or both sides here.
Ah, what I meant was this kind of news verification pinball. Disinformation, truths that then get blurred by disinformation, rumors, quick stances made in the heat of the moment. It reminds me of accounts of what it was like to be a journalist in the 1800's and early 1900's.I would say the baby thing is unlikely, since stories like that are old war propaganda, meaning every single conflict has those exact stories. We got it for iraq, we got it for germany. The old style story is either babies being thrown into the air and being impaled on bayonets' or swords but its the same thing.
Were there instances of germany killing babies in ww1? In ww2 I could kind of believe that since they were really dedicated to the whole 'exterminating the jews/gays/mentally whatever' but ww1? I know there were stories but there are always stories about everyone.Ah, what I meant was this kind of news verification pinball. Disinformation, truths that then get blurred by disinformation, rumors, quick stances made in the heat of the moment. It reminds me of accounts of what it was like to be a journalist in the 1800's and early 1900's.
As for whether or not it's true. That babies died is true, it's just not possible for an attack that successful to not have killed babies, the question is how many, if any, were deliberately killed.
A further thing is, there WERE cases of Germans killing babies in WW1, but they were small instances and not reflective of the German army as a whole. It's... Humanity is tiring.
In WW1, the German person the British gave the nickname of "the baby-killer" to was Zeppelin, who pioneered the airships that bear his name, after a Zeppelin raid on London killed a baby, which was great for British propaganda. If Germans were known to be going around killing babies deliberately, and personally, I don't think he'd have been the one to have gotten the nickname.Were there instances of germany killing babies in ww1? In ww2 I could kind of believe that since they were really dedicated to the whole 'exterminating the jews/gays/mentally whatever' but ww1? I know there were stories but there are always stories about everyone.
From what I remember, the cases were from early in the war when they were still trying to carry out the Schlieffen plan. The sheer number of soldiers marching through countries not their own led to disorganization in many places. But that's what I remember.Were there instances of germany killing babies in ww1? In ww2 I could kind of believe that since they were really dedicated to the whole 'exterminating the jews/gays/mentally whatever' but ww1? I know there were stories but there are always stories about everyone.
In modern war, a lot of civilians die, in old war a lot of civilians die. War isn't a good thing, unless you just want there to be a lot less people, its pretty good at reducing numbers for a bit.In WW1, the German person the British gave the nickname of "the baby-killer" to was Zeppelin, who pioneered the airships that bear his name, after a Zeppelin raid on London killed a baby, which was great for British propaganda. If Germans were known to be going around killing babies deliberately, and personally, I don't think he'd have been the one to have gotten the nickname.
It's also worth nothing that the Germans did kill lots of civilians (notably in Belgium). The outrage this generated is understandable, but the same had been done on larger scales by all the major combatants in places like Africa for generations, and did stop just before (or after) WW1.
I think most if not all of em would be appalled at the sight, like a normal person with empathy and humanity.
That's more or less Hamas vs Netanyahu's clique, yes.Adolf Hitler versus Adolf Hitler.
Mm. There are few things less inspiring than having to pick between two bunch of murderous scum.That's more or less Hamas vs Netanyahu's clique, yes.
I was not aware we have to pick a side?Mm. There are few things less inspiring than having to pick between two bunch of murderous scum.