So they are disrupting what is that, 1% (generously) of 10% of global traffic? Oh wow, I'm so worried. You're really convinced me they're a menace and need to stop trying to stop an ongoing genocide.
And I guess if you were around in 2010 or 2014 with the Republicans winning both houses of Congress you would argue the same thing. (It's just Republicans participating in democracy, who cares if they win both houses, they haven't won the presidency, and most governments are still democracies including the US)
Every action has consequences. Being the starter of a shitstorm (End of free trade) isn't a good idea. It's like sanctioning Yemen for example and having the Saudis invade it or not recognizing the post-Pol Pot Government installed by Vietnam. First comes the action, second comes the short-term consequences(likely people dying), and third comes the actual long-term consequences(More people dying, proxy wars, famines, closer encounters, oftentimes large black swan events that no one can predict would happen but happened anyway)
Think about what free trade means in terms of sociology. It's just that a social interaction. I want mangos you want corn let's barter with a defined means of exchange. Free trade is a sign of a healthy society, community, and an open society. Look I get it everyone especially people right now thinks that less community, more atomization, less toxicity, fewer red flags, fewer third places, less relationships of all types are great. But that is horrible for human society, and mental health, and is the reason we have so many suicides, deaths of despair, deaths from poor diets, deaths from being homeless, and deaths from mass shootings. It takes a a village to raise a child as it has for thousands of years, it takes a community to be a society. If you destroy the economic links of society and the world you will be left with a world of despair, war, deaths, and famines.
If you destroy free trade in hopes, that is all that it is. The hope that Israel will yield, when time, and time again economic warfare has failed to do anything but destroy, and cause more conflict, it's great in the short term at reducing a country's power, but it's pretty bad at solving problems in the long term, and eventually we will have to use methods that work like trade, economic ties, and diplomacy after we are done shooting each other unless you want the war to go on longer like in Iraq or Afghanistan.
The Houthis, Hezbollah, and Iran could in theory kill a hundred thousand Israelis right now if they launched every single missile that they could to hit Israel. And I am sure that the US could do the same but worse to Iran, Hezbollah, and the Houthis. But would it make the world a safer place against genocide to have a regional war no, would it stop Israel from dropping 2000 lb bombs on Gaza City and Khan Younis no, and would it cause the US to leave the Middle East, likely not they would likey get more involved.
The only way we are solving this is when Biden and Blinken get through to the Israeli Government that the longer this goes, the worse it will get for Israel, and the less the US will back Israel. Which Biden is likely doing in backroom talks he pulled the Ford AIrcraft carrier away to de-escalate.
Plus blaming every Western country for Israel's carpeting bombing of Gaza is like blaming every teacher in China for that one kindergarten teacher who did an open-hand slap of me and other children at a pre-K school in Southern China. The same logic occurs with mass shootings. Shooting people doesn't solve problems in the long run. Even for police, it should be a tool of last resort a lesson most cops in America are having to learn. It's like blaming every single liberal for drone strikes in the Obama era, he's not a god, and he's a president in a republic with checks and balances and he's human he had a warped economic view brought by the University of Chicago.
Edit: I will explain more on a topic later on.