Go on, keep on using AI to try and program something and you'll soon find out that it makes plenty of dumb-as-fuck mistakes and you need actual know-how of what you're asking it to do to actually get shit done.
No... but no in the sense that I really do not care one way or the other.
People like that I never set aside and will always be bitches that high behind cowardly tactics just to feel better about themselves.
Agreed. Though Steam have had its few moments where they were the enablers for people act like asses, or sat on their asses and nothing. They've gotten way better right about it now, but that doesn't erase what came before.
Again that's not what is says... The 1st part (the long sentence) is the key to everything the bill is saying. It says "the offense of contributing to social transition if the person is acting in official capacity provides support, which is material, information, or other resources". Step 2 is just saying if you do Step 1, it's a felony.
But it's not criminalizing saying a pronoun. Again, this bill isn't even going to get voted on, it's a nothing bill. Do I agree with the bill? Hell no, but you don't need to lie about what the bill would do if passed. It's kinda a pointless bill because the teacher would probably get fired if they did this anyway, but making it a felony is pretty dumb.
Even Mutahar is saying the company is awful and he's not some right-wing/woke gamer channel. And you guys are defending what these employees are doing?
Sweet Baby Inc. Doesn’t Do What Some Gamers Think It Does
No, one company isn’t ‘forcing’ diversity into all your favorite video gameskotaku.com
I don't know who Mutahar is but stuff like this isn't helping the perception that only right wing morons hate SBI.
That would depend on context. The bill states that using pronouns in line with the kid's sense of identity can contribute to "social transition", which it aimed to criminalise. So depending on the context, yes, using certain pronouns could have been criminalised under that bill.
I know who he is. He goes by the username SomeOrdinaryGamer. He's fine, but I have little to no interest in a majority of his videos. Not to mention, he can get clickbaity at times. I've noticed something about SBI critics. Almost all the negative press comes from the alt right, Ultra conservatives, or those claiming to be "neutral", but clearly on the fringe side of the right. Like I said before, I trust the alt right even less than SBI. I ain't coming for the defense either, but I will keep a lookout. Though they're not my main concern right now. We all got much bigger problems right now. I know I do.
He's just a super ordinary game and tech channel creator and decently big because sometimes it says his videos are trending in the top whatever. Again, who the fuck cares if some group you don't really like hates something? Why can't you just objectively look at something and just have your own opinion? Guess what, people you don't normally agree with, you'll agree with sometimes, that's how things just work out.
And a bill making it illegal to lure kids in a car/building can be interpreted as simply saying "hi" is luring. Just because something can be interpreted as something extreme doesn't mean it will or legally can be. This is another one of those things that if you look at bills you agree with, you can find tons of vagueness in them that could possibly lead to such extreme scenarios. But you don't point that out in bills you do like, you only do it in bills you don't like and act like it's the end of the world.
Oh, I follow a few curators whose reviews I broadly trust, but I also follow ones that flag games with Denuvo, games with problematic DRM in general, games DRM and anti-cheats that work via rootkit, and one that details cut content between ports and regions.
Literally, never heard of these games
Two sides:
If it wasn't the intention of the bill to criminalise the harmless use of pronouns in use with a kid's gender identity, then the bill wouldn't specifically be talking about it.
Exactly.Two sides:
Somehow, the first of these is a hate campaign and the second one is not.
- Decided they aren't fans of games a certain company has worked on, and made a list of such games that other users can opt-in to see on relevant store pages.
- Saw that this list existed, posted on Xitter identifying both the list and it's creator and tried to rile up their followers to pressure Steam to both ban this list from existing and ban the Steam account of the person who created it.
Simple question: Are these hate campaigns, or useful information advising consumers what they are getting into?
Steam Curator: Denuvo Games
This curator is tracking Denuvo Anti-Tamper games on Steam. Make sure to also check out the group and the Discord server.store.steampowered.com
Steam Curator: No To Easy Anti-Cheat
Wanna see if a game has the anti-cheat known as Easy Anti-Cheat? Follow us and see.
It's part of how they defined social transitioning... That doesn't mean it's intent to charge someone with a felony for saying a pronoun.
The guy who accused one of his critics of being a pedophile thinks that it's unfair to ban someone for posting child porn. You can't make this shit up.
Part of how they defined social transitioning. Which they intend to criminalise the contribution to.
It's literally listed in the bill what contributes to social transitioning... And it doesn't include pronouns.
