Oh, for goodness' sake: read the rest of that post you snipped. You're taking one of a half dozen examples, reducing the argument to that, and then demanding we have the conversation on those terms alone while ignoring the wider point. That's why it's a reductionist strawman. Probably because you know you've already been given a dozen examples that fit the wider point perfectly well, and you'd prefer to ignore them.Sure, Silvanus. Sure.
But, if it'll help you get past this: "staying in the kitchen" is a shorthand for the notion that women are uniquely and best suited for domesticity, and ill suited to other pursuits. So your prime direct example would be Lauren Southern.
Last edited: