But then he'd know he's wrong, so he won't do that.I would suggest the best way to do that is to look at wider, supporting evidence.
But then he'd know he's wrong, so he won't do that.I would suggest the best way to do that is to look at wider, supporting evidence.
I think being a prominent female voice is a relevant counterpoint.Regarding the evidence of the source being into "tradwife", I think a reasonable person would argue that's relevant supporting evidence for the former.
So all we have to go on is a statement from the CEO of the site, which is itself generally a far-right hangout, that they had a disclosure request from an unnamed agency about a possibility. And said CEO is jumping to bullshit conclusions even within that statement.Well this hasn't been posted here yet but apparently government agencies and put in a request for information from Gab where apparently the shooter had an account he used to show support for President Biden
Trump shooter Thomas Crooks’ likely social media account he used to support Biden found
Thomas Matthew Crooks, the gunman who attempted to assassinate former US president Donald Trump, appears to have used a social media microblogging site called 'Gab' to lend support to President Joe Biden and his policies. According to the platform's CEO, Andrew Torba, he learned about Crooks'...www.wionews.com
The CEO did post some examples of the posts made there by said account that's had information requested about it.So all we have to go on is a statement from the CEO of the site, which is itself generally a far-right hangout, that they had a disclosure request from an unnamed agency about a possibility. And said CEO is jumping to bullshit conclusions even within that statement.
Yeah, which give no indication they're by Crooks.The CEO did post some examples of the posts made there by said account that's had information requested about it.
Privacy, I guess? If they share their home with someone else. While driving I guess it'd be a way to pass the time.What's up with all these blokes filming their rants in their cars anyway? At least this one isn't actually driving. No ugly sunglasses too.
Why?I think being a prominent female voice is a relevant counterpoint.
Because she's a woman and very obviously and publicly not innately submissive. I think anyone who has met women can tell you that women are not, on average, naturally submissive people. If that was something women tended to do on their own, the guidance to do so wouldn't be written in the Bible, you don't have to make a rule that nobody wants to break anyway.Why?
History would tell us that many people have defended popular notions and societal status of their demographic group's inferiority. For instance, this is the basis of the pejorative "Uncle Tom" relating to black people. Individuals may do this for a number of reasons, such as because they accept the societal message put out, they wish to curry favour with the dominant group, saying so is of personal benefit to them, that they fear change. I think this can involve an element of hypocrisy or dishonesty, that people preach expectations that they manifestly do not themselves meet.Because she's a woman and very obviously and publicly not innately submissive. I think anyone who has met women can tell you that women are not, on average, naturally submissive people. If that was something women tended to do on their own, the guidance to do so wouldn't be written in the Bible, you don't have to make a rule that nobody wants to break anyway.
There are many people that make me feel that wanting to be big on social media is a lot more about narcissism than it is anything else. That guy is one of them.
Or, these people do not interpret it as 'inferiority'-- they can view submissiveness or traditional, restrictive roles as equivalent. Or they say they do.History would tell us that many people have defended popular notions and societal status of their demographic group's inferiority. For instance, this is the basis of the pejorative "Uncle Tom" relating to black people. Individuals may do this for a number of reasons, such as because they accept the societal message put out, they wish to curry favour with the dominant group, saying so is of personal benefit to them, that they fear change. I think this can involve an element of hypocrisy or dishonesty, that people preach expectations that they manifestly do not themselves meet.