You speak of course of letting the Ukrainian coup government do whatever it would to regain Donetsk and Luhansk over the objections of the people who live in those places; if they couldn't accomplish it without help, they didn't deserve to be safe from the Azov regiment.Funnily enough, you're making an identical argument to the one the tankies employ for Ukraine: the victim can't win, so stand aside and let the perpetrator do whatever they want without consequence or opposition.
There is a similarity between Russia before February 2022 and Hamas before October 2023 in that they both saw situations in which the status quo was just going to get worse and worse and there was no apparent means to change that without violence-- the Zionist terror state wasn't interested in stopping its ethnic cleansing and other crimes against humanity no matter what Hamas or any other Palestinian group might propose and the United States/NATO wasn't responding to Russian diplomatic overtures regarding the continually escalating threats against it.
Israel has plans for Palestine and 'Greater Israel'. America (and the rest of the blob) has plans for Eastern Europe and Russia. Neither can be negotiated with. And those who make peaceful resolution impossible make violent resolution inevitable.
Heh.
Can't really think of a reason this should be concerning in the same way as Charles Koch's endorsement of Hillary was (though even that was more emblematic than a concern in itself). While it is easy to think of very concerning reasons for a Koch endorsement of a Clinton, and how it confirmed certain perceptions about her, Duke's endorsement is sort of baffling. Unless it's just because antisemitism led him to hate the Zionist terror state for the wrong reasons. Or maybe he isn't a one-dimensional archetype of evil, though I don't really care to investigate the matter enough to find out as he is simply not that important anymore. Maybe he's a two or even three dimensional archetype of evil like Biden, Trump, Bush, Clinton, Cheney, or Harris. (To be as vacuous as any among that lot requires three dimensions).
Nothing tippy2k2 wrote was inaccurate or an unfair characterization. The Biden administration has the power to very easily stop being complicit in genocide, and probably even to stop the genocide as well. Instead, they are doing the polar opposite. Harris has made every indication that she will continue that policy. If people are OK with reelecting that, then they are OK with being complicit in genocide. That is just accurate. If it makes people feel bad for their political favorites to be described accurately, then they should feel bad.Why do you guys so often have to end up calling everyone who disagrees with you Nazis?
I appreciate that you might feel frustrated and pressured by so many people disagreeing with you, but there are better ways to deal with it. Not least because once you've gone there, those people will tend not to care what you say anymore. I might argue that's part of why the US Green Party, and many progressive groups, struggle to get anywhere.