Hey kids we're going to Disneyland in two weeks.That's not a contradiction.
....
Hey, are we going to Disneyland this land this weekend?
-Well, Disneyland is very expensive you know....
Fuck off.
Hey kids we're going to Disneyland in two weeks.That's not a contradiction.
Hey guess what the next sentence of the interview was?Hey kids we're going to Disneyland in two weeks.
....
Hey, are we going to Disneyland this land this weekend?
-Well, Disneyland is very expensive you know....
Fuck off.
Let's extend your metaphor:Q: If the prices of groceries don't come down, will your presidency be a failure?
A: I don't think so. Look, they got them up. I'd like to bring them down. It's hard to bring things down once they're up. You know, it's very hard. But I think that they will. I think that energy is going to bring them down. I think a better supply chain is going to bring them down.
You know, if someone previously said something would definitely happen rapidly, and then said it "maybe will but it's hard", I'd apply a smidgen of tonal awareness and think they were laying the groundwork to let me down.Hey guess what the next sentence of the interview was?
How do you expect to do tonal analysis on his words when you paraphrase both ends of it?You know, if someone previously said something would definitely happen rapidly, and then said it "maybe will but it's hard", I'd apply a smidgen of tonal awareness and think they were laying the groundwork to let me down.
I would like you to imagine a right-winger suggesting that food prices are dictated by a cabal of George Soros' buddies, and tell me your opinion of their comments.The real question is whether he would force his corrupt buddies to stop price gauging at which we all know the answer is no.
My opinion would be "You voted for this shit, why are you complaining?"I would like you to imagine a right-winger suggesting that food prices are dictated by a cabal of George Soros' buddies, and tell me your opinion of their comments.
What is wrong with Peter Thiel lol is he peaking on some experimental cocktail of stimulants
The tonal shift is so blindingly obvious in his actual words that the paraphrase is pretty immaterial, honestly.How do you expect to do tonal analysis on his words when you paraphrase both ends of it?
If it was taken independently, it would seem more like the latter. The fact that it's such a stark contrast with definitive promises pre-election is what's drawing suspicion.Have you never heard Trump brag that he's done things that nobody else could do, that everyone said was impossible? He says these things all the time (and gets away with it because the pundits are idiots who say every Republican campaign promise is impossible and a lie). You want to actually consider his words and think about his likely intentions, let me show you two possible explanations of saying something is hard, and you tell me which seems Trumpier.
He said: " It's hard to bring things down once they're up. You know, it's very hard. But I think that they will."
This could be:
A) Trump does not believe he can lower grocery prices, so he is trying to start carefully tempering expectations before he even takes office.
B) Trump is trying to inflate how great he is by elevating the challenges he promises to take on.
Which of those better matches that man's character?
Aw, reality tv bloke desperately want another 15 mins.
It's not as though he volunteered the topic. He was asked "If the prices of groceries don't come down, will your presidency be a failure?" He answered in a way that strokes his own ego and denies them opportunity to claim he called himself a failure later on. I'm not saying it's a praiseworthy response, he's still being kind of a turd, just in a different way than you've all been lead to believe. I mean, "politician claimed with confidence he would accomplish the things that he hopes to accomplish but obviously can't guarantee" is not particularly hard-hitting journalism, but people are so desperate for things to criticize here, demand has apparently outstripped supply.If it was taken independently, it would seem more like the latter. The fact that it's such a stark contrast with definitive promises pre-election is what's drawing suspicion.
Then why not fly them to Nevada and Arizona, where fewer people live?It's planes
Planes and mass hysteria
Because the people and packages on those commercial airliners aren't necessarily going to Nevada and Arizona.Then why not fly them to Nevada and Arizona, where fewer people live?
Please get this through your head: i am responding directly to the words he used, I am not being "lead".It's not as though he volunteered the topic. He was asked "If the prices of groceries don't come down, will your presidency be a failure?" He answered in a way that strokes his own ego and denies them opportunity to claim he called himself a failure later on. I'm not saying it's a praiseworthy response, he's still being kind of a turd, just in a different way than you've all been lead to believe.
Uhrm, people have always criticised it when a politician definitively promises something, then backtracks or softens their commitment when they get the chance to fulfil the promise. That's one of the most common and reasonable things to call out. It's done with politicians across the board; this example isn't particularly more egregious than examples from Biden or a dozen other American pols that have also been rightly criticised.I mean, "politician claimed with confidence he would accomplish the things that he hopes to accomplish but obviously can't guarantee" is not particularly hard-hitting journalism, but people are so desperate for things to criticize here, demand has apparently outstripped supply.
I suppose I'm supposed to believe that you read the full interview before forming an opinion and concluded that the particular words Time chose to single out were a complete and appropriate summation of what he was saying.Please get this through your head: i am responding directly to the words he used, I am not being "lead".
That's not the difference. The difference is on you trying just so hard to defend whomever I disagree with. Get this through your head: if the roles here were reversed, this conversation would have ended already. If it was the Daily Wire instead of Time calling out Biden instead of Trump, and I posted it in here only to have you tell me that they cut Biden's quote one sentence short of his point to make him look bad, I would thank you for telling me.The difference is that when it's Trump, you'll contort yourself into mental knots to defend the obvious shift.