www.theguardian.com
Well that specifically would be weird as Oklahoma wasn't a state when the trail of tears happened. But for the spirit of your question, if Oklahoma had offered to take all forcibly displaced people with no limit, allowing for the ethnic cleansing of the native Americans, I would blame them. When we talk about Egypt and Jordan, they take very limited scopes of people. Jordan for example have taken a couple thousand sick children, but they took a specific number of a specific class of person for obvious humanitarian reasons alone.
There's an interesting question here that I don't think this answer got to the bottom of.
Of a broad movement, yes. It's pretty case by case. The Biden/Trump corridor would be assisting in ethnic cleansing because the people setting it up are trying to cleanse the area. But contrasting Syria during it's civil war, for example, most refugees were simply in the crossfire, and if it were say the UN setting up a corridor, a broadly 3rd party faction that might reasonably try to return people post conflict, no.
www.kenklippenstein.com
There's been update on this; he's held at La Salle in Louisiana.
You can try to whitewash Genocide Joe all you want, the man still tried to ethnically cleanse Gaza.
Oh so Trump doing harm to Gaza just like everywhere else was part of the sales pitch?
