Just shoot her in the head.Its okay guys, she's technically correct!
...
What an arsehole.
After all, what's the big deal? We're all going to die, it may as well be sooner rather than later.
Just shoot her in the head.Its okay guys, she's technically correct!
...
What an arsehole.
And the rest of her response sounds like everyone else shouldn't care if they're left to die, because they're going to die anyway.Her actual response was that they're going to protect our most vulnerable on Medicaid.
That wasn't how she answered the actual question, that was the response to a heckler shouting "people are going to die". "Everyone dies" is a composed and accurate response to useless hysterics. "People are going to die" is not a policy argument, no policy is going to change that universal truth, to acknowledge that and then discuss the actual reasoning behind the policy is a mature way to handle it.And the rest of her response sounds like everyone else shouldn't care if they're left to die, because they're going to die anyway.
"Everyone dies" is a composed and accurate response to useless hysterics.
You're talking in circles. "People are going to die" is a declaration of opposition to a policy argument, because that policy is going to cause people to die. Countering it with "Well, we're all going to die" (and then later, pushing Christianity in response) is the kind of "oh well, whatever" response that Republicans are throwing around any time they've gotten caught giving brainless responses to criticism of Trump's policies. We don't all belong to your cult, and we don't all shut our brains off any time El Jefe speaks.That wasn't how she answered the actual question, that was the response to a heckler shouting "people are going to die". "Everyone dies" is a composed and accurate response to useless hysterics. "People are going to die" is not a policy argument, no policy is going to change that universal truth, to acknowledge that and then discuss the actual reasoning behind the policy is a mature way to handle it.
...Well, not according to Christian mythology, which makes the combined appeal to both Christianity and technical accuracy even more bizarre.Well, at least you got one thing right by noting it was technically accurate.
Well, one's immortal soul doesn't die: the rest however does....Well, not according to Christian mythology, which makes the combined appeal to both Christianity and technical accuracy even more bizarre.
There were at least two people who supposedly didn't die at all: Elijah and Enoch were taken living up to heaven.Well, one's immortal soul doesn't die: the rest however does.
I figure Joni Ernst won't enjoy the same treatment.There were at least two people who supposedly didn't die at all: Elijah and Enoch were taken living up to heaven.
I challenge the assertion that Trump has made it clear what he wants on this issue. Or if he has any concrete desires regarding it at all. Maybe he says he wants a deal, and maybe next week, or next sentence even, he says something else.Most Americans are right...
![]()
Trump made clear he wants a deal with Iran. Most Americans agree.
If Trump does make a deal with Iran that limits its nuclear capabilities to peaceful ends, he will likely have strong approval from the American public.www.brookings.edu
A nuclear deal with Iran, eh? Maybe a bit like the one there was before, that Trump ditched?Most Americans are right...
![]()
Trump made clear he wants a deal with Iran. Most Americans agree.
If Trump does make a deal with Iran that limits its nuclear capabilities to peaceful ends, he will likely have strong approval from the American public.www.brookings.edu
If "People are going to die" is a declaration of opposition to a policy, than you have to oppose every policy, as every policy is going to allow people to die. Useless hysterics.You're talking in circles. "People are going to die" is a declaration of opposition to a policy argument, because that policy is going to cause people to die.
Lol okay, Mr. Logic.If "People are going to die" is a declaration of opposition to a policy, than you have to oppose every policy, as every policy is going to allow people to die. Useless hysterics.
So why the opposition to abortion, then?If "People are going to die" is a declaration of opposition to a policy, than you have to oppose every policy, as every policy is going to allow people to die. Useless hysterics.
He wanted a deal that he made because he gets kickbacks for doing so, and also he let the neo-cons like John Bolton run his first admin to the ground.I challenge the assertion that Trump has made it clear what he wants on this issue. Or if he has any concrete desires regarding it at all. Maybe he says he wants a deal, and maybe next week, or next sentence even, he says something else.
Qatar wants it, and they gave him a 747 for his library.A nuclear deal with Iran, eh? Maybe a bit like the one there was before, that Trump ditched?
Cause killing is bad.So why the opposition to abortion, then?
Bear in mind how Trump has used his charities/foundations/etc. You absolutely know that in Trump's mind that they have given him a 747.Qatar wants it, and they gave him a 747 for his library.
Bollocks. The president of the USA is a fucking billionaire, and he's grabbing everything that isn't nailed down. There are undoubtedly some politicians who would be less inclined to corruption were they paid more, but there might not be that many of them, and you need to face facts that a ton of politicians, like the current president, will stuff their pockets no matter what you pay them.If you want government corruption to stop you need to pay them more and increase the cost for doing so.