Funny events in anti-woke world

[Trunkage]

He's already a convicted felon and adjudicated racist. What sort of dirt do you imagine anyone has that makes any difference?

I think Trump could be taken down in public estimation, but it would take a huge and cohesive effort by the US right to do so: Congress, media, and more. They've already demonstrated that they won't.

The only thing Trump can do is wreck his own reputation, and despite myriad demonstrations of incompetence, ineffectuality, waste and general uselessness, his side has rallied around to protect him every time. He would need to do something properly and obviously serious to shake their trust, like oversee a recession. For instance, he's tanked the US economy Q1 2025 with stupid tariffs, but it will very likely recover to modest overall growth for the year, and that would be excused or forgotten.

Trump has already wrecked his reputation. That's why they like him

Edit: Biden and Hanks 'murder' child for their blood. Unless the evidence shows that Trump did something similar, nothing will move the needle

It's WHY Trump made outlandish claims about his opponents. So he can get away with whatever he wants

 

[Trunkage]

Trump to Unleash Revenge Plot on California for Being Too Liberal

The administration is preparing to cancel federal funding for the blue state.

www.thedailybeast.com

Time to bring libtard Newscum to heel.

Supreme Court allows DOGE to access Social Security data

The dispute concerns efforts by the Department of Government Efficiency, largely led by Elon Musk, to access sensitive data, including Social Security numbers.

www.nbcnews.com

What comes first? The inevitable security failure or bye-bye social security.

I've always wondered why they were complaining that Biden was going to target red state and disadvantage them...

It was them self projecting, letting us know what they planned

 

[XsjadoBlaydette]

the more memories return of how much the legacy media and unwitting normies laundered Peterson's kinda blatant bollocks, the more anger builds. though is more a dull ache of anger, ain't got the fucking energy to waste on what can't be changed. real talk though, who the hell takes someone calling themselves a professional anything while claiming all of English literature is corrupt seriously in the first place? noone thought that, as well as rabid anti-communism decades after its US-fueled extinction was a mere couple red flags short of a gleichschaltung? perhaps expecting anything from such institutions was too naive

this guy seems a lil annoying, but dim tool is worse, he needs slapping down and out away from the unassuming normos


this is just audio, podcast, is just less hassle adding youtube links here, and artwork is pleasing the less for ants it's scales to

 

[Hades]

the more memories return of how much the legacy media and unwitting normies laundered Peterson's kinda blatant bollocks, the more anger builds. though is more a dull ache of anger, ain't got the fucking energy to waste on what can't be changed. real talk though, who the hell takes someone calling themselves a professional anything while claiming all of English literature is corrupt seriously in the first place? noone thought that, as well as rabid anti-communism decades after its US-fueled extinction was a mere couple red flags short of a gleichschaltung? perhaps expecting anything from such institutions was too naive

this guy seems a lil annoying, but dim tool is worse, he needs slapping down and out away from the unassuming normos


this is just audio, podcast, is just less hassle adding youtube links here, and artwork is pleasing the less for ants it's scales to

That clip where a kid verbally smacks Peter around is so fun.

 

[Trunkage]

the more memories return of how much the legacy media and unwitting normies laundered Peterson's kinda blatant bollocks, the more anger builds. though is more a dull ache of anger, ain't got the fucking energy to waste on what can't be changed. real talk though, who the hell takes someone calling themselves a professional anything while claiming all of English literature is corrupt seriously in the first place? noone thought that, as well as rabid anti-communism decades after its US-fueled extinction was a mere couple red flags short of a gleichschaltung? perhaps expecting anything from such institutions was too naive

this guy seems a lil annoying, but dim tool is worse, he needs slapping down and out away from the unassuming normos


this is just audio, podcast, is just less hassle adding youtube links here, and artwork is pleasing the less for ants it's scales to

I'll only give a partial blame to Peterson on this one. Jubilee obfuscated what this debate was about which made two groups of people talk at cross purposes and this is clearly not Peterson's fault. It was Jubilee's .... AND Peterson did his normal 'everyone is allowed to have ideas as long as they don't disagree with me' schtick he has been doing for a long time

 

[Agema]

the more memories return of how much the legacy media and unwitting normies laundered Peterson's kinda blatant bollocks, the more anger builds. though is more a dull ache of anger, ain't got the fucking energy to waste on what can't be changed.

There's an element of hindsight in that. Jordan Peterson was, back in the day, a respected academic who wrote a reasonable self-help book for men and had some controversial political views: there was no particular reason to metaphorically slap him silly. It was only later he became nothing but a petty little troll. Intolerance should be reserved for the intolerable, otherwise we're the fascists.

 

[Trunkage]

There's an element of hindsight in that. Jordan Peterson was, back in the day, a respect academic who wrote a reasonable self-help book for men and had some controversial political views: there was no particular reason to metaphorically slap him silly. Intolerance should be reserved for the intolerable, otherwise we're the fascists.

Watch the debate. Peterson tries to slap many people silly over not very controversial political views.

This thing all started because other people were treating Peterson in 2015 like how he treated them. (You do have the dogpile problem, which is a separate issue for the media.) Peterson knows how to leverage victimhood to wealth and fortune and others don't

 

[Phoenixmgs]

What's "not how they would work"? Some societies are obviously not limited to a single ethnicity. Such as most countries on earth today. As well as more than a few historical ones, such as Rome.



If a representative or senator is voting on a bill, they're supposed to know what it contains, yes. We elect them to vote on legislation. The ones with a shred of integrity will read what they're voting on, or know its damn contents.



This "Covid bullshit" you think happened is based on a photoshop. I'm not entertaining this.

If you're trying to shift the goalposts to talking about other policies/public health guidance, rather than the photoshop you fell for, then I'm not interested.

Any civilizations (whether real or fictional) would not be diverse until you come to "modern" times or the future (like say The Time Machine).

You have different standards for different people.

Kids had to wear masks outside (even wearing masks inside for kids was stupid). Kids couldn't go to school for 18 months. That's covid bullshit that you keep defending.

 

[Agema]

Watch the debate. Peterson tries to slap many people silly over not very controversial political views.

Why? It's 2025 and at this point Peterson is nothing but a right wing troll. I'm not adding to his social media views even if just to criticise him, because every extra click is just helping him stay relevant and get the last laugh.

This thing all started...

It doesn't matter how it started, or how good he is hyping himself.

Pretty much no-one here thinks Peterson is anything less than a c**t, and there's was plenty of that showing in ~2015, too. But acting like he should never have got the time of day back then is not consistent with believing in a free and fair society where people get to speak up and where we engage differences of opinion with reasoned discussion. It is part of the complexity of life that as well as being a c**t, as a psychologist he knew his stuff and wrote a reasonable book that got him a lot of attention.

 

[Silvanus]

Any civilizations (whether real or fictional) would not be diverse until you come to "modern" times or the future (like say The Time Machine).

Diverse societies have existed in classical and pre-modern eras. Rome is an example. I don't see why this is relevant anyway; it's a mythical setting based on the 1800s Dutch. Black people existed and were present.

You have different standards for different people.

No, I would expect anyone who supposedly runs a department to have a basic knowledge of what it's publishing. If a department at my own employer produced a report full of falsified bullshit, the director would be in serious hot water.

Kids had to wear masks outside (even wearing masks inside for kids was stupid). Kids couldn't go to school for 18 months. That's covid bullshit that you keep defending.

No, that's the bullshit you want to shift the topic onto, rather than simply acknowledging you fell for a photoshop.

 

[Phoenixmgs]

Diverse societies have existed in classical and pre-modern eras. Rome is an example. I don't see why this is relevant anyway; it's a mythical setting based on the 1800s Dutch. Black people existed and were present.



No, I would expect anyone who supposedly runs a department to have a basic knowledge of what it's publishing. If a department at my own employer produced a report full of falsified bullshit, the director would be in serious hot water.



No, that's the bullshit you want to shift the topic onto, rather than simply acknowledging you fell for a photoshop.

And Asians and Latinos too? Oh my!

Complain when democrats do that was well, which you don't. Literally nothing will come out of this report that you are all complaining about so why complain about it? I really don't fucking get it.

It may have been photoshopped, but it did happen. Are you defending schools being closed for 18 months, are you depending kids being forced to wear masks at all?

Minnesota apparently recommends students wear masks with mouth holes to band practice | AlphaNews.org

The MDH seems to recommend that students involved in their schools' bands and orchestras wear masks with mouth holes while playing their instruments.

alphanews.org

 

[Silvanus]

And Asians and Latinos too? Oh my!

OK. So to be clear, you believe the cast of any adaptation of The Little Mermaid should exclusively feature people likely to be in 1800s Netherlands? So no American accents, for instance, and no Jamaican singing crab.

Complain when democrats do that was well, which you don't.

Let's see an example of a federal agency under any other administration publishing AI slop.

It may have been photoshopped, but it did happen.

Lol sure.

Hate to tell you this, but r/mildlyinfuriating is a karma farm. Almost everything on there is bunk, fake stories to whip up engagement and get reddit awards.

And that Alpha News article is just horseshit. The department "seems to recommend"... no, no it doesn't.

 

[Gergar12]

I know old article but why are conservatives like this...

Dutton jokes about rising sea levels in Pacific

Immigration Minister Peter Dutton is facing a backlash over a quip about the plight of Pacific Island nations facing rising seas from climate change.

www.abc.net.au

 

[The Rogue Wolf]

ICE agents are stuck with deportees in a military base in Djibouti in what are being described as "inhumane conditions".

ICE agents stranded in Africa: What to know

Agents and detainees are now confined in a makeshift detention center in a shipping container facing risks from disease, and warnings of potential attacks.

www.newsweek.com

"ICE officers continue to feel ill with symptoms such as coughing, difficulty breathing, fever, and achy joints. These symptoms align with bacterial upper respiratory infection, but ICE officers are unable to obtain proper testing for a diagnosis."

See, this would be okay if it was happening to brown people, but now it's happening to God's beloved, white Americans! This must be stopped!

 

[BrawlMan]

ICE agents are stuck with deportees in a military base in Djibouti in what are being described as "inhumane conditions".

ICE agents stranded in Africa: What to know

Agents and detainees are now confined in a makeshift detention center in a shipping container facing risks from disease, and warnings of potential attacks.

www.newsweek.com

See, this would be okay if it was happening to brown people, but now it's happening to God's beloved, white Americans! This must be stopped!

Sucks to be those ICE agents, and hope they continue to burn in hell.

 

[Thaluikhain]

I know old article but why are conservatives like this...

Dutton jokes about rising sea levels in Pacific

Immigration Minister Peter Dutton is facing a backlash over a quip about the plight of Pacific Island nations facing rising seas from climate change.

www.abc.net.au

If it makes you feel better, he recently led his party to a massive defeat in an Australian federal election.

OK. So to be clear, you believe the cast of any adaptation of The Little Mermaid should exclusively feature people likely to be in 1800s Netherlands? So no American accents, for instance, and no Jamaican singing crab.

Or mermaids. Which, ok, need a bold move to make the next version of an often told story to be different.

 

[Schadrach]

OK. So to be clear, you believe the cast of any adaptation of The Little Mermaid should exclusively feature people likely to be in 1800s Netherlands? So no American accents, for instance, and no Jamaican singing crab.

Counter question: How do you think people would respond if a movie were to be announced tomorrow based on Yoruba myth and any orisha that appear in the story were played by white folks? They are mythical figures so that's OK, right? You think the general response would be the same?

 

[Agema]

Counter question: How do you think people would respond if a movie were to be announced tomorrow based on Yoruba myth and any orisha that appear in the story were played by white folks? They are mythical figures so that's OK, right? You think the general response would be the same?

No, the response might not be the same, and... that's not necessarily a problem.

We all know the world is a complicated place, and it would be nice if everything ran to very simple, clear rules, but virtually nothing does. And whenever we try to run to very simple, clear rules, injustice and atrocity abounds.

For instance, in this case, we know that some races, cultures, etc. have been marginalised or patronised in media in ways that are potentially offensive or belittling, and they have far less ability to speak up for themselves. If they are to be offered a degree of protection, maybe there's no harm in that. And thus we might want to handle Yoruba religious myths with a degree of consideration where we don't offer the same to a children's story with no sensitive cultural attachments. Just to be clear here, the inane barking of anti-woke warriors are based on bogus sensitivies: these people have no love, attachment or interest in the source material they are fighting for.

 

[Silvanus]

Counter question: How do you think people would respond if a movie were to be announced tomorrow based on Yoruba myth and any orisha that appear in the story were played by white folks? They are mythical figures so that's OK, right? You think the general response would be the same?

I do not think it would be the same response, and nor do I think it would be a good idea. But the reason has nothing to do with canonical accuracy. Western-European stories have had an enormous amount of cultural exposure and plenty of awareness. Yoruba stories have not.

 

[XsjadoBlaydette]

I'll only give a partial blame to Peterson on this one. Jubilee obfuscated what this debate was about which made two groups of people talk at cross purposes and this is clearly not Peterson's fault. It was Jubilee's .... AND Peterson did his normal 'everyone is allowed to have ideas as long as they don't disagree with me' schtick he has been doing for a long time

are you aware Peterson called in and made jubilee change the title from. "1 Christian" to "Jordan Peterson" afterwards? this is all part of his continuous deception that am still baffled ppl take at face value

Testy Jordan Peterson exchange during Christianity debate viewed 3.4M times

The Canadian psychologist and author refused to say whether he was a Christian in a debate with 20 atheists.

www.newsweek.com

While the video is now entitled Jordan Peterson vs 20 atheists, it is was originally called 1 Christian vs 20 atheists, according to an archived version of the page on WaybackMachine.

trying to get any solid answers out of him is like getting blood from stone, and that's because he knows he can't argue any of his stances on their merits alone, the entire schtick is to be everything and nothing at the same time so you can attack everyone else but they can't attack you while you're shifting between whatever stance is most useful for weaseling out of awkward questioning. one guy got him to finally admit he believed in the resurrection of jesus but it took way more hassle than a simple question and answer should;

Jordan Peterson is sinking into crisis by denying his faith - Catholic Herald

Jordan Peterson’s recent appearance on Jubilee Media’s 1 Christian vs. 20 Atheists (a title that has since been changed for reasons that will become obvious shortly) was not just another clickbait clash of ideologies. It was an unraveling of sorts, one that must be viewed not in isolation, but...

thecatholicherald.com

Peterson’s refusal to be pinned down on this question isn’t noble agnosticism. It’s self-preservation masquerading as mystery. It’s not doubt, not humility – it’s strategic shapeshifting. A calculated hedging of bets. It’s the anxiety of a man who knows that clarity can cost him audience numbers. That conviction draws lines. That once truth is named out loud, there’s no retreat; that you can’t put the toothpaste back in the tube, and you can’t unring a bell.

This fact is not lost on the good doctor, which is why he circles continuously. He clouds. He talks of metaphysical realms and psychological utility. But when self-preservation begins to dictate public behaviour, it becomes a kind of possession in its own right. And it doesn’t turn men into prophets. It turns them into politicians.

Let me be clear: he doesn’t need to be a Christian to be worthy of respect. But he does need to be honest. Especially now, especially when his entire public persona is scaffolded around the Christian tradition. When he breaks into tears over Christ. When he urges men to live biblically. When his lectures edge closer and closer to sermons.

You cannot traffic in sacred meaning without ever stating your own. You cannot sell Christian archetypes while dodging Christian identity. You cannot turn the Bible into content and then refuse to say whether you believe a word of it. That’s not wisdom. That’s not right. You don’t get to bathe in the sacred for profit and then towel off when questioned. That’s cowardice.

The truth is, Peterson has become a preacher for a disenchanted generation. For better or worse, people believe him and look to him for answers. And when those people – broken, angry, searching – ask if he believes, they deserve more than weird word games.

If he said “Yes, I believe,” I’d respect the clarity. If he said “No, I don’t,” I’d respect the courage. If he said “I don’t know,” I’d respect the humility. But the stern-faced sexagenarian doesn’t say any of those things. What he offers instead is a maze of sophistry. You can’t build a church, fill it with seekers, light the candles, hand out hymnals, and then slink into the confessional and duck for cover when asked if you believe.

That’s not humility. That’s abdication. That’s spiritual cowardice. Jordan Peterson has told millions to shoulder the cross, to walk the narrow path and to act in an honest manner. But honesty requires a spine. And right now, all we’re getting is squirming.

There's an element of hindsight in that. Jordan Peterson was, back in the day, a respected academic who wrote a reasonable self-help book for men and had some controversial political views: there was no particular reason to metaphorically slap him silly. It was only later he became nothing but a petty little troll. Intolerance should be reserved for the intolerable, otherwise we're the fascists.

hindsight for some maybe, but for others studying far right tactics, beliefs, rhetoric etc it was not only obvious but intensely frustrating trying to warn ppl. back then I knew far far less while learning on the go with help from more experienced researchers, but still enough to recognise his hysterical bullshit for what it was. let's not forget the whole reason he got famous was through melodramatic claims he's going to be sent to prison for misgendering any of his students if the goddamn communists get their way. and if that wasn't enough, anyone in the media who bothered to even mildly look into his personal history would find attempts to become reactionary RW politician (before he got famous for the trans hysteria) in local elections, alongside regular spouting off about the looming communist far left fascist threat about to take away everyone's freedoms as well as corrupting all education already. in the video above there's footage showing his pretty glaring historical revisionism of Hitler and the holocaust, somehow totally ignored and kicked under the rug all these years also.

to be clear, I'm referring to the media class here in regards to frustration, it was implied their jobs were journalism not surface-level reactionary stenographers for bad faith far right shit-stirrers while coincidentally saving those precious investigative resources for dissecting/dissolving progressive (in the economic sense) activists they can't just comfortably ignore anymore - mainstream legacy speaking, hashtag notallmedia and all that jazz of course. but how many financially insecure ppl really get to read the private eye these days?