In other words, "not Chicago". We'll not mind how crime in DC is at a thirty-year low...for now.
Meanwhile, Chicago is 22nd in the country in murders per capita, 92nd in total instances of violent crime per capita. Funny how I don't see similar activities or even the intent to engage in such activities in Birmingham (1st in murder, 11th in violent crime), St. Louis (2nd/9th respectively), Memphis (3rd in murder, 1st in violent crime), Baltimore (4th/5th), Detroit (5th/3rd), or Cleveland (6th/6th).
Of course, Birmingham, St. Louis, and Memphis are in red states. Detroit and Cleveland are in battleground states. Baltimore is the only one of those actual "murder and violent crime capitols" in a blue state, but being it's part of the greater DC metro area it's real interesting how DC got the attention whereas Baltimore got none during this "crime fighting" surge. You'd think of all places in the greater DC metro area to nationalize law enforcement, Baltimore would be first and foremost on the list, but apparently not.
It's almost as if this is a political ploy to continue spinning blue state cities as crime-ridden, while trying to bury facts about actual crime statistics and which cities are least safe.