If anyone is tempted not to take me at my word, note that not even Silvanus can call what I said inaccurate.
Yes, this is how deceptive description works: the speaker exaggerates or manipulates certain details, omits others entirely, and leans on tropes and insinuations rather than
explicitly lying. And yet if we actually look at those details dispassionately and without the surrounding manipulative language, they don't point to the conclusion the speaker is trying to paint.
OT:
Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.
youtube.com
"Nothing bad can happen, it can only good happen. But with Tylenol, don't take it. Don't take it. And if you can't live, if your fever's so bad you have to take one because there's no alternative to that. Sadly. First question, what can you take instead? Its actually there's no alternative to that. And as you know other of the medicines are absolutely proven bad, they've been proven bad, with the aspirins and the advils, right? And they've been proven bad".
Well there you have it, clear as crystal. Nothing bad can happen, it can only good happen, and also there's no alternative.