I think that might be less on the industry and more on gamers being idiots.And people sent death threats to the devs over this whole thing.
The entire gaming industry is just such a farce sometimes.
I think that might be less on the industry and more on gamers being idiots.And people sent death threats to the devs over this whole thing.
The entire gaming industry is just such a farce sometimes.
It's both. Whenever these threats happens, it's almost always the devs getting hit with them 99.9%. Regardless of what they do or what they wanted to do. While those in the exec class, publishers, or shareholders either get threats, or especially don't do anything to defend the devs doing their job and following the publishers orders.I think that might be less on the industry and more on gamers being idiots.
Cancelling the game outright is pretty much out of the question, what with all the effort apparently put into it. A delay would make more sense; a release with a huge publicity blitz would be... daring, is what I'll call it.So in regard to Highguard, the game launches in a week, and I know nothing about it. No trailers, no ads, nothing. Are they not even gonna try?
It should come out at least, there is no reason not to just launch a completely finished video game. If it makes no money then whatever it wouldn't make any money if you deleted it either. But maybe it makes a few dollars and you can celebrate by buying the dev team Taco Bell and maybe the terrible shitstorm they experience will be a valuable lesson.Cancelling the game outright is pretty much out of the question, what with all the effort apparently put into it. A delay would make more sense; a release with a huge publicity blitz would be... daring, is what I'll call it.
Either way, those developers were set up for failure. Like clockwork. Taco Bell would just be insult to injury for some of them.It should come out at least, there is no reason not to just launch a completely finished video game. If it makes no money then whatever it wouldn't make any money if you deleted it either. But maybe it makes a few dollars and you can celebrate by buying the dev team Taco Bell and maybe the terrible shitstorm they experience will be a valuable lesson.
And here are some note-worthy (or should I say cringe-worthy) death threats in recent years that I can think of:And people sent death threats to the devs over this whole thing.
The entire gaming industry is just such a farce sometimes.
Yep. Thank you for taking note of all that. Yet some people or those same people tried to victim blame.As for Fallout NV;
And here are some note-worthy (or should I say cringe-worthy) death threats in recent years that I can think of:
Just to name a few. And this does not even include other forms of harassments, I.E. The VA for Ada Wong in RE4 Remake getting bullied off the internet
- Death threats over No Man's Sky launch delay.
- Death threats over Cyberpunk 2077 launch delay
- Laura Bailey, the VA for Abby in TLOU2, getting death threats.
- Palworld devs receiving heat for copy-paste design of the creatures (debatable)
- In mid-2025, some teenage brat threatened Epic Games employees over Fortnite
The question is if the software can be used stand alone outside of the game's code. If it's only downloadable or usable as a mod for a given game then CDPR is within their rights to sue. The program must exist on it's own so that it can be called a platform (like Playstation, Microsoft, whatever) otherwise it's a mod and mods require the game the run.CPDR has issued a DMCA strike on a CP2077 VR mod. Particularly on how it's paid mod and the modder is generating income from it.
The modder has refuted, saying he created the software that supports various games to be played in VR, and doesn't work with the game source codes themselves. The modder is open to negotiate with CDPR further on the matter
Nothing wrong with being agressively okay. For years that was Ubisoft's approach to things and it worked for a while.I think there are highlights around sure. But games like Pillars and South Park aren't GOTY 10/10's either. Like i said, Obsidian is really good at being "okay". Sometimes a little more than "okay" and never bad either.
For some reason I just picture some AC protagonist screaming "I AM OKAY!!!! AND THAT'S PERFECTLY FINE! SOMEONE WILL LOVE ME MAYBE FOR AWHILE!"Nothing wrong with being agressively okay. For years that was Ubisoft's approach to things and it worked for a while.
CPDR has issued a DMCA strike on a CP2077 VR mod. Particularly on how it's paid mod and the modder is generating income from it.
The modder has refuted, saying he created the software that supports various games to be played in VR, and doesn't work with the game source codes themselves. The modder is open to negotiate with CDPR further on the matter
Oh, I remember when the Call of Duty developers got death threats for changing the refire rate of a sniper rifle in multiplayer by fractions of a second.As for Fallout NV;
And here are some note-worthy (or should I say cringe-worthy) death threats in recent years that I can think of:
Just to name a few. And this does not even include other forms of harassments, I.E. The VA for Ada Wong in RE4 Remake getting bullied off the internet
- Death threats over No Man's Sky launch delay.
- Death threats over Cyberpunk 2077 launch delay
- Laura Bailey, the VA for Abby in TLOU2, getting death threats.
- Palworld devs receiving heat for copy-paste design of the creatures (debatable)
- In mid-2025, some teenage brat threatened Epic Games employees over Fortnite
If they don't release it, possibly they can write it off on their taxes and make money that way. It works for movie studios.It should come out at least, there is no reason not to just launch a completely finished video game. If it makes no money then whatever it wouldn't make any money if you deleted it either. But maybe it makes a few dollars and you can celebrate by buying the dev team Taco Bell and maybe the terrible shitstorm they experience will be a valuable lesson.
Let's not forget the death threats aimed at Bioware over the Mass Effect 3 ending. Which, not defending the ending, but....it's a video game ending. Is that really the hill you (literally) want them to die on?Oh, I remember when the Call of Duty developers got death threats for changing the refire rate of a sniper rifle in multiplayer by fractions of a second.
None of this would happen if it was possible to punch people in the face through the Internet.
I don't think it makes much sense to "count" the death threat sent, there's plenty of people who are mentally sick but still have access to the internet, these people have very limited understanding of what is an "okay" behavior and often only understand that they can integrate themselves into a group by showing devotion to whatever hold the group together. When a game gets popular enough, it will inevitably get a few of them. When the dev displease the fan base, those people will try to show devotion by taking the most extreme action they can to show how devoted they are to the game.Let's not forget the death threats aimed at Bioware over the Mass Effect 3 ending. Which, not defending the ending, but....it's a video game ending. Is that really the hill you (literally) want them to die on?
Doesn't excuse it, fuck that, and they can fuck themselves either way.I don't think it makes much sense to "count" the death threat sent, there's plenty of people who are mentally sick but still have access to the internet, these people have very limited understanding of what is an "okay" behavior and often only understand that they can integrate themselves into a group by showing devotion to whatever hold the group together. When a game gets popular enough, it will inevitably get a few of them. When the dev displease the fan base, those people will try to show devotion by taking the most extreme action they can to show how devoted they are to the game.