Oh there were perverts, just mellow ones, cowardly. If you didn't let em do anything they went away.Southern Europe is full of perverts, you just didn’t notice.
Oh there were perverts, just mellow ones, cowardly. If you didn't let em do anything they went away.Southern Europe is full of perverts, you just didn’t notice.
He went across state lines armed specifically because he wanted to fight violent protesters. He went specifically into a dangerous situation knowingly, and went because it was a dangerous situation. Self defense does not apply.Proof Revnek. You got proof or is this another of your, "Lol, no you" responses that contributes nothing?
You know what the difference is. You just choose to look the other way.He was running away. Aren't we always told that people running away are not a threat every time one of them gets shot by the cops?
"She was wearing a short skirt and went knowingly to the rave where she knew 5 women have been raped in the last month and she flirted with guys, she has no right to pepper spray the attempted rapist, that's assault!"He went across state lines armed specifically because he wanted to fight violent protesters. He went specifically into a dangerous situation knowingly, and went because it was a dangerous situation. Self defense does not apply.
That this time the guy is white so he's held personally responsible for his actions prior to his "innocently running away", despite being an actual minor in this case?You know what the difference is. You just choose to look the other way.
The point about having the loaded gun there illegally really needs to be stressed here. It isn't like he went there unarmed looking for a fight and punched someone here. HE KILLED THEM. Like lethal force isn't a big deal or something. A loaded gun isn't like bringing brass knuckles and most of the time even brass knuckles are illegal for a reason. This guy went looking for a fight WITH A LOADED GUN. This is what you expect to happen when you do this.He went across state lines armed specifically because he wanted to fight violent protesters. He went specifically into a dangerous situation knowingly, and went because it was a dangerous situation. Self defense does not apply.
Like I said, you look the other way. By all means, keep proving me right.That this time the guy is white so he's held personally responsible for his actions prior to his "innocently running away", despite being an actual minor in this case?
Sadly for you, this is actually legal precedent. Self-defense applies very specifically and in every state is invalidated by intentionally approaching a dangerous situation."She was wearing a short skirt and went knowingly to the rave where she knew 5 women have been raped in the last month, she has no right to pepper spray the attempted rapist, that's assault!"
We are supposed to look the other way if a black guy murders 3 people or something? I don't see anyone doing that here either. Black teens are actual minors too you know."She was wearing a short skirt and went knowingly to the rave where she knew 5 women have been raped in the last month and she flirted with guys, she has no right to pepper spray the attempted rapist, that's assault!"
That this time the guy is white so he's held personally responsible for his actions prior to his "innocently running away", despite being an actual minor in this case?
He got Milkshaked, not beaten up. Which I don’t condone. But I also understand why he got MilkshakedAbout all I know about that guy is that he got beat up by a mob and had brain bleeding.
Kinda topical, no?
If we’re just gonna play hypotheticals then let’s go to the natural conclusion of the original scenario. Bunch of guys decide they’re gonna fight to the death. All of them know it’s a fight to the death going in. Is the winner a murderer? Yes. Easily. Convicted in a heart beat."She was wearing a short skirt and went knowingly to the rave where she knew 5 women have been raped in the last month and she flirted with guys, she has no right to pepper spray the attempted rapist, that's assault!"
Also, he did not have a brain bleed. They would not have discharged him from the hospital so soon with a malady that serious. Ngo is just another grifter who found out faking medical ailments causes dumb white people to give him their money.He got Milkshaked, not between up. Which I don’t condone. But I also understand why he got Milkshaked
He was at a planning meeting of a bunch of fascists who later, with Ngo, attacked an Antifa hangout, beating them up and leaving a woman permanently crippled
He isn’t liked because he is meant to be a journalist. Participating in attacks is way different than reporting on them
Man, even if you'd said nothing else on these forums, if that's all you've allowed yourself to remember about Ngo, that's all that's needed to know what side you are when it comes to fascists.About all I know about that guy is that he got beat up by a mob and had brain bleeding.
Kinda topical, no?
They are not telling us what they would have done, but they are absolutely telling us what sort of things they believe in.Everyone making excuses for how this was actually a reasonable response is telling us this is exactly what they would have done themselves.
They support this.
Purely legally speaking, I do think the kid should get some form of negligent homicide conviction, because he put himself in the situation in the first place, but it'd only be on the count of the first guy he shot, I'd let him go on the other two.If we’re just gonna play hypotheticals then let’s go to the natural conclusion of the original scenario. Bunch of guys decide they’re gonna fight to the death. All of them know it’s a fight to the death going in. Is the winner a murderer? Yes. Easily. Convicted in a heart beat.
It's more that that's all I've been exposed to. I saw him on Rogan once. Wasn't a very interesting podcast so I didn't look further.Man, even if you'd said nothing else on these forums, if that's all you've allowed yourself to remember about Ngo, that's all that's needed to know what side you are when it comes to fascists.
FYI, Dreiko spent weeks iin the Ahmaud Arbery thread ferociously trying to prove Arbery was a thief who deserved to die at the hands of those good citizens who ran him down and shot him, too. He's building up quite the pattern.Man, even if you'd said nothing else on these forums, if that's all you've allowed yourself to remember about Ngo, that's all that's needed to know what side you are when it comes to fascists.
Are you fucking serious? OH WOW.. Wearing a short skirt is comparable to a gun how? Wearing a short skirt is related to rape how? A skirt isn't a lethal weapon of war designed to murder people. According the extremely abundant amount of information we have on this, rapists usually target modestly dressed shy girls, not confident girls wearing short skirts because the modestly dressed girls are more likely to feel ashamed and not fight back or turn them in.. The ignorance of this post is overwhelming to the point of being nauseating. Flirting isn't trying to provoke violence. He literally killed people."She was wearing a short skirt and went knowingly to the rave where she knew 5 women have been raped in the last month and she flirted with guys, she has no right to pepper spray the attempted rapist, that's assault!"
That this time the guy is white so he's held personally responsible for his actions prior to his "innocently running away", despite being an actual minor in this case?
I still don’t think he should have been Milkshaked. But then, I had no idea what he was up to until then. Because crippling a person from Antifa is generally ignored. A cut to a grifter makes national news. And we keep pretending that the MSM are only biased against ConservativesAlso, he did not have a brain bleed. They would not have discharged him from the hospital so soon with a malady that serious. Ngo is just another grifter who found out faking medical ailments causes dumb white people to give him their money.
The other two have the worst self-defense argument because he had already killed someone.Purely legally speaking, I do think the kid should get some form of negligent homicide conviction, because he put himself in the situation in the first place, but it'd only be on the count of the first guy he shot, I'd let him go on the other two.
I'm well aware. That's why I said "even if you'd said nothing else on these forums." Frankly we've been having the same conversation with the same people and positions for a couple of years, only the frequency has gone up this summer.FYI, Dreiko spent weeks iin the Ahmaud Arbery thread ferociously trying to prove Arbery was a thief who deserved to die at the hands of those good citizens who ran him down and shot him, too. He's building up quite the pattern.
Just wait until he brings up bloody sheets.The guy illegally took a deadly weapon to instigate violence where it was illegal for him to even be there and you just compared that to some ignorant misogynistic propaganda that isn't even related to one another in your hypothetical scenario.