We also have video evidence of the person running away shooting peopleMore like "we have video evidence of him pulling a gun on someone who was trying to run away"
We also have video evidence of the person running away shooting peopleMore like "we have video evidence of him pulling a gun on someone who was trying to run away"
"He shot that man officer!"But "he got shot, therefore he was trying to execute someone" holds water.
This is disingenuous as shit. Ran away. Didn't shoot anyone. Still running. Doesn't shoot anyone. Gets hit in the back of the head. Still doesn't shoot anyone. Trips. Still doesn't shoot anyone. Guy tries to flying kick him. Shoots at person attacking him, misses. Guy hits him with a skateboard and tries to take his gun. Shoot him. Guy walks up, lifts his hands up and backs off, doesn't get shot. Guy runs up and lifts his hands up, doesn't get shot, goes back in with his pistol and gets arm shot. Guy walks up, raises his hands up and backs off, doesn't get shot.We also have video evidence of the person running away shooting people
He had already fucking murdered a guy. None of that shit will hold given he already killed someone. You don’t just get to keep killing people who attack you because you killed someone. Further, given he is possibly in the process of breaking the law by brandishing a weapon at all, and definitely by breaking curfew, he’s fucked either way as there plenty of precedent to choose from for not acknowledging self-defense if you’re in the process of committing a crime. Even more so if they find anything in his social media to establish motive and a desire to do harm to protesters.This is disingenuous as shit. Ran away. Didn't shoot anyone. Still running. Doesn't shoot anyone. Get hit in the back of the head. Still doesn't shoot anyone. Trips. Still doesn't shoot anyone. Guy tries to flying kick him. Shoot at person attacking him, misses. Guy hits him with a skateboard and tries to take his gun. Shot. Guy walks up, lifts his hands up and backs off, doesn't get shot. Guy runs up and lifts his hands up, doesn't get shot, goes back in with his pistol and gets arm shot. Guy walks up, raises his hands up and backs off, doesn't get shot.
Fallacy: Begging the question. You cannot assume that the point you're trying to prove is true, and use that as evidence that the point you're trying to prove is true.He had already fucking murdered a guy
Blatantly false.You don’t just get to keep killing people who attack you because you killed someone.
So is using CS gas (a.k.a. "tear gas").It is when they're drawing a gun on you after a false surrender.
Again in war it's literally a war crime.
When the world operates in accordance with your debate club I’ll give a fuck. Go kick a football.Fallacy: Begging the question. You cannot assume that the point you're trying to prove is true, and use that as evidence that the point you're trying to prove is true.
So you don't care about logic? Okay. Then you admit that your argument isn't logical. Thanks for playing.When the world operates in accordance with your debate club I’ll give a fuck. Go kick a football.
Houseman, I’m not saying the other people get to plea self defense. In all likelihood, *nobody will.* The dude with a handgun may go to jail too, and I wouldn’t be fucking surprised, because they are all provoking one another by mindlessly waving guns around in a chaotic situation. You’re operating under the false presumption that to condemn the kid you’re defending everything possibly done or contemplated being done to him. That’s false.
I don’t care about Aristotle’s bullshit, no.So you don't care about logic? Okay. Then you admit that your argument isn't logical. Thanks for playing.
The law clearly says that if you are withdrawing, you can claim self-defense.Houseman, I’m not saying the other people get to plea self defense. In all likelihood, *nobody will.* The dude with a handgun may go to jail too, and I wouldn’t be fucking surprised, because they are all provoking one another by mindlessly waving guns around in a chaotic situation. You’re operating under the false presumption that to condemn the kid you’re defending everything possibly done or contemplated being done to him. That’s false.
Ignoring where the law puts more stipulations up on claiming self-defense if you’re in the process of committing a crime, and more federal precedents regarding these kinds of scenarios when the defendant has motive and there’s evidence they showed up with the intent to do harm (Charlottesville). Stop fucking internet lawyering and just admit the kid killed people and that it was wrong to do so. This isn’t fucking hard.The law clearly says that if you are withdrawing, you can claim self-defense.
The law says one thing, and you say another.
I'ma side with the law.
Nah, all available evidence is on my side and all you have is "no it isn't!"Stop fucking internet lawyering and just admit the kid killed people and that it was wrong to do so. This isn’t fucking hard.
Because it fucking isn’t! This is identical to the arguments about Charlottesville! Do you remember how that turned out! Do you have a memory that goes back three years!Nah, all available evidence is on my side and all you have is "no it isn't!"
There it is, there's the "no it isn't!"Because it fucking isn’t!
Yes, if you ignore everything I say it sure looks like that’s all I said.There it is, there's the "no it isn't!"
You wanna bring evidence to the table? Then post some links. Otherwise, all you have is "no it isn't!" and "logic is wrong!"Yes, if you ignore everything I say it sure looks like that’s all I said.
Fuck the forums. Fuck everything. We’re so culture war obsessed we’re holding up our terrorists as the most righteous terrorists and you think there’s some civility to preserve? There’s nothing. We’re gonna burn one another to death and then question for decades how it got this far, when the capacity for this event was there from the first moment men defined a nation. This is what the liberals built, this isn’t surprising, this is the dull hum of nationalism and the violence and isolation that comes with that rising to a dull roar.
Ok, so I know that I'm here shitposting again but guys, can you please contain your arguments to their relevant threads? This one is about the man shot at a protest in Portland, yet we have had that anime thread show up here and now this thread is just straight "Kenosha thread part 2: electric boogaloo". All this negativity is flowing out into the rest of the forums like a busrt dam.
NoYou wanna bring evidence to the table? Then post some links. Otherwise, all you have is "no it isn't!" and "logic is wrong!"
Except he wasn't in the process of committing a crime.Ignoring where the law puts more stipulations up on claiming self-defense if you’re in the process of committing a crime, and more federal precedents regarding these kinds of scenarios when the defendant has motive and there’s evidence they showed up with the intent to do harm (Charlottesville). Stop fucking internet lawyering and just admit the kid killed people and that it was wrong to do so. This isn’t fucking hard.
No it's not identical to Charlottesville. There's literal video and multiple picture from different angles in this case. It would be hard to find a more clear cut case of self defence.Because it fucking isn’t! This is identical to the arguments about Charlottesville! Do you remember how that turned out! Do you have a memory that goes back three years!
Edit - you also deleted the fucking part where I explain why your evidence doesn’t amount to shit, but hey let’s all be twelve year old debate club nerds more obsessed with winning points than reaching truth.