It's a coin flip if he dies or not. Yeah, he has the best medical care, but he never really listens to the experts and common sense. Hopefully whoever treats him does a poor job on purpose.
I agree, not all Narcissists are malicious, Trump is however, the people who have worked with him tell he is malicious to the point of being dangerous and needs to be removed from office, so there's that too.Narcissists are frequently unpleasant or difficult, but they aren't necessarily malicious. I think Trump is malicious, domineering, vindictive: his record of bullying, his rule-breaking, his mockery of people weaker than him, his sister describing him as "cruel". I think a lot of that could potentially be changed, but not without sufficient motivation. It's not clear to me what that motivation could be - he's too rich and too powerful to ever fall in the way us hoi polloi can. Even a Trump that had a business crisis and downsized to mere hundreds of millions would still be a vastly rich and powerful man able to lord it over the masses. He'd still be rich and powerful if jailed for fraud and placed in a 5* prison for the elites (although I'm sure a convenient "health problem" and his age would be leveraged for some sort of house arrest or parole). Humiliating, sure. But not a catastrophe.
Yea, you already know that has nothing to do with this thread, you just found it and said "HEY I MUST USE THIS" came to the current events section, gabbed the first trump thread you spotted and posted. Mhmm and you wonder why Abe refuses to grant Missouri statehood.Poster for this thread.
You say this like the right isn't already trying to make the US a theocracy, and haven't been doing so since the 80s.Coronavirus is benign for the vast majority of people. Even if he could be considered to be somewhat in the risk group Trump will be fine. Please no creepy guy Pence and his theocracy.
I already said the right is an amalgamation of various groups. In politics it's an alliance of convenience. What does a libertarian have in common with a christian bible thumper? But again, I have yet to see anyone on the left condemn antifa.You say this like the right isn't already trying to make the US a theocracy, and haven't been doing so since the 80s.
I just meant that your comment about pence and his theocracy, implies it wouldn't start going that way unless he was in power. But we've already seen, for decades, their entire party, not just pence, push a religious dictatorship over a democracy.I already said the right is an amalgamation of various groups. In politics it's an alliance of convenience. What does a libertarian have in common with a christian bible thumper? But again, I have yet to see anyone on the left condemn antifa.
They're both awful to be near?What does a libertarian have in common with a christian bible thumper?
You do realize that Libertarians are actually their own party in the US right? They only even vote GOP at all when they show they support small government. The right doesn't actually even need the libertarians to have a majority. The libertarians do not vote GOP when they start getting all into theocracy again. They have libertarian' representatives elected here in Texas as well. The GOP are adversaries of Libertarians here..I already said the right is an amalgamation of various groups. In politics it's an alliance of convenience. What does a libertarian have in common with a christian bible thumper? But again, I have yet to see anyone on the left condemn antifa.
Probably because I'm anti-fascist.But again, I have yet to see anyone on the left condemn antifa.
And we already know the right wing libertarians don't give a shit. Every theocracy has proven that wealth and power are the best Get Out of Church Free card you can get. Rich people in Dubai get drunk. The Saudi royals overruled the clerics to bring back TV shows they liked. Republicans get abortions under the table all the time. Theocrats are surprisingly amenable to compromises where the rich and powerful are involved.I just meant that your comment about pence and his theocracy, implies it wouldn't start going that way unless he was in power. But we've already seen, for decades, their entire party, not just pence, push a religious dictatorship over a democracy.
What?Yea, you already know that has nothing to do with this thread, you just found it and said "HEY I MUST USE THIS" came to the current events section, gabbed the first trump thread you spotted and posted. Mhmm and you wonder why Abe refuses to grant Missouri statehood.
No. Everyone will just move on to bitching about someone else.I do wonder what it will be like when Donald will eventually die. Will his grave be constantly vandalized? It's going to be awkward that they are going to have to show him respect in his funeral.
I don't know about this.Exactly, so that is why I am saying this will be very bad for the people due to how he will respond after as I already discussed on the first thread about this:
I thought about this. And if it's a play, it's a really, really dumb play.Color me sceptical.
Mighty convenient way for him to not have to attend more debates.
Also mighty convenient way for him to downplay the severity of covid-19, pretend to be infected and then make a miraculous recovery and claim that the virus is just a simple flu, nothing to worry about, forget about those 212.000 dead Americans.
Well yeah, because it's all bullshit scare tactics to keep a population in line through fear of an invisible father figure who will punish them if they don't obey the rulers on the earth.And we already know the right wing libertarians don't give a shit. Every theocracy has proven that wealth and power are the best Get Out of Church Free card you can get. Rich people in Dubai get drunk. The Saudi royals overruled the clerics to bring back TV shows they liked. Republicans get abortions under the table all the time. Theocrats are surprisingly amenable to compromises where the rich and powerful are involved.