And yet big tech is being looked into to an extent and right to repair has been seemingly making gains.
Which absolutely fucking sucks, but they are basing this on the precedent established by companies like John Deere, that being said I despise big tech companies like Apple and Tesla too, this doesn't really contradict my point, it simply emphasises how right I am about the tyranny of corporations.
Do they?
Or are they the same level of cutbacks that were happening before based on usage of boxes and locations which is being spun now as somehow an attack on said sector?
These changes were already undergoing because Democrats are also shit and they also want the post office gone, if anything it's proof that neither party gives a rat's ass about the well-being of rural communities, if they did they would recognise the value of maintaining the post office and even investing more on it, they have this absurd twisted notion that it must bring a profit, when in reality it just needs to provide a service that is of vital importance to the citizens of it's country.
The first people to be shot under anarchist rule will be the anarchists.
This only demonstrates your ignorance about Anarchy, you clearly neither know what it actually is, how it works or the fact that plenty of Anarchic states have existed throughout history, and most have fallen due to intervention by filthy Neoliberal capitalists rather than a failure of the system, indeed we don't have enough information to fully judge the merits of the system but that's only because Capitalists keep intervening so that you don't see it, of course for it to fully work, ideally we need to get rid of Capitalism in a World Wide scale since it has proven to be a cancer on society and the World, I mean it's literally bringing about the end of the World, it doesn't get worse than that.
All you get under communist system is corruption still going on and people getting screwed over one way or another by the one party.
That's why there have been several solutions that have been thought of to prevent what happened to the Soviet Union from being repeated again, observing different factors that lead to it's downfall, clearly there was too much emphasis within it on military spending which led to food scarcity throughout the Soviet Union, there was too little emphasis on the quality of the products the public consumed which led to general malcontent, and well the corruption you talk about was mostly caused by CIA infiltrations on the Soviet government so that is partially the fault of Capitalism, however I do agree that as long as there is an Authoritarian government there will be corruption, which is why I want Anarchy, with a horizontal power-structure so no one individual holds power above the rest, that is the point of Anarchy to eliminate all unnecessary power structures.
1) Trump is better for the UK to get a trade deal with as the Obama administration (that Biden was VP in) said the UK would go to the back of the queue
2) To actually change the world you have to recognise the global reach of corporations and as such you have to stop global exploitation of people from less well of nations. That means a harder stance on migration which actually in the long run benefits those countries that were being exploited by draining less talent and skilled workers helping them develop more.
3) You want to push for changes to green energy etc you need the USA to not get into more wars to install friendly governments to get easy oil supply thus costs go up and corporations see green energy as the cheaper option.
4) Culling bullshit critical theory stuff that is used a lot to turn people against one another (and is said to have helped the downfall of occupy wall street) means people will be less about fighting one another and more about taking on the corporations.
5) China and it's love of censoring things via proxies being shut down is a good thing for most entertainment.
1) Don't really know about that.
2) Yes, exactly the Corporations are more powerful than most governments which is why they need to be appropriated from those horrible rich assholes that own them so that we can use their resources for the people, as for migration, the migration problem only exists because of Capitalism, if it wasn't because Capitalism forces a certain amount of the population to be unemployed so that there's always competition in the job market willing to accept lower & lower wages and the migrants are important because as long as they keep them outlawed as second class citizens they can utilise them to bring that exploitation of the worker to the maximum, as they don't have the same protections a regular citizen has, if you want to address migration abolishing Capitalism would make more sense, but failing that if migrants had the exact same rights as the regular population there would be no reason for companies to hire them over regular citizens, in fact since most of them don't speak the local language they would be at a severe disadvantage on the job market.
4) Yes, congratulations that's what we on the left are trying to achieve, we want the working class to unite and take for themselves what's rightfully theirs so that we can end Authoritarian rule and we don't have to do what the corporate and politician scum want, this is directly the opposite of what Trump wants BTW and you'd need to be pretty stupid to believe that corporate scum want this, why do you think he likes the Proud Boys and only condemns the KKK reluctantly?
5) Yeah, I don't like China either, it's government is far too authoritarian for me to approve of such a thing, after all unlike you I actually believe in freedom for the people.
