Biden v. Trump Election Mega Thread

Who will win the election?

  • SleepyJoe

    Votes: 15 30.0%
  • Donald Trump

    Votes: 9 18.0%
  • It doesn't matter who wins, because we will all lose in some way.

    Votes: 26 52.0%

  • Total voters
    50
Status
Not open for further replies.

ObsidianJones

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 29, 2020
1,118
1,442
118
Country
United States
Al Gore and his fighting climate change position being one.

Obama on about time for change
Thanks for Humoring me


The Coronavirus and the Handling of it




Economy



Climate Change and the Environment




None of this was hidden. These are the same points he has been hammering over and over again.

But if you're just looking for his slogan? It's Build Back Better. What does that mean? All the things I linked to. His positions were made clear. America is hurting now.

Trump lost jobs

September job growth slowed significantly from the revised 1.5 million jobs added in August.

And even though the economy added back more than 1 million jobs every month between May and August, the country is still down 10.7 million jobs since February, before Covid-19 hit.
Trump fractures the American Union for political gain

“There’s a reason why he says what he says the way he says it, because it still has resonance,” Michael Steele, a former Republican National Committee chairman, told the MSNBC network on Monday. “It still has appeal to a significant number of white Americans in cities, in suburbs, in rural parts of our country. So this is going to require a lot more effort to pull out that vote that Joe Biden is going to need versus what a Trump is going to need.”

On the eve of independence day, Trump staged a jamboree at Mount Rushmore, which depicts images of presidents George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, both of whom owned slaves, as well as Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt. He railed against “far-left fascism” that he claimed wants to desecrate such monuments, earning cheers from an overwhelmingly white crowd in the Black Hills of South Dakota

Steele added: “I’m sceptical that this is going to be a big win for Joe, or a cakewalk in any way, because the president knows what he’s doing. He does what he does and says when he says the way he does it for a reason, because he knows at his core there’s appeal.
And we're not even talking about how Trump directly used this four years to increase his wealth.


Being anti-harmful thing is as much of a platform than anyone ever needs. It's literally the only thing Republicans usually say when they are running. The horrible Left has turned this into an America that isn't yours. Isn't that bad? Isn't that unnatural? Isn't that hateful? Vote for me. I'm against that and I'll make sure it will change.

Hell, that was the platform Trump used to get in. Anti-Politician. Anti-Obama. Why is it suddenly not valid when it's applied to the first Orange American?

Whether you believe them or trust them isn't the same thing as him not stating his platform. He has clearly done so numerous times.
 

Trunkage

Nascent Orca
Legacy
Jun 21, 2012
9,042
3,035
118
Brisbane
Gender
Cyborg


^Points out how it's not about what ones groups position actually is just painting the other group as the enemy.

This election really shows it. To a lesser extend 2016 showed it too.

This election Biden really hasn't set clear positions, but nor has Trump either.

in 2016 Trump had obvious clear stances and positions on stuff. Hillary gave you the option of 5 second audio bites or saying "Well if you wanted to know my policy on X why didn't you read the 75-200 page document I put out just on this single policy which was one among many"
Yeah, I think this has got way more to do with 1. The US government losing control over media. 2. The previous society that was propagated was a façade. It started breaking as soon as the control was gone. 3. The Soviets not being the big bad to blame. 4. Identity politics of the late 70s (eg. Christians becoming anti-abortion) starting rearing their head through very specific people who wanted to manipulate the GOP into a certain path. 5. Punishments not sticking. Everyone saw what happened to Nixon and have been trying to inoculate themselves from the normal feedback loops. Bill Clinton probably broke a lot of things there.

Al Gore and his fighting climate change position being one.
Al Gore fighting climate change was ridiculous considering how many people he locked up and called eco-terrorists. He is one of the people responsible for the current mess we are in
 

Gergar12

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 24, 2020
3,921
864
118
Country
United States
Why do you think I was saying it is more difficult for us to open more rare earth mines in the US? The one we have keeps contaminating everything as it is, and look at the map above to where the rare earth minerals are.

China created the largest Solar farm in the world so that they WILL be able to shift off of coal. They are taking the steps necessary to being able to shut the coal plants down when they build enough supplemental power.

.

We DO buy things from other countries, just not all other countries have everything we can buy from China. The other nations are not the size or have the ability to produce everything we buy from China. That is a primary issue here. People in the US already cannot afford basic necessities, they cannot afford price increases. If we fail to address the actual economic issues in the US first, making any changes that will increase the cost of living and lower standard of living isn't feasible.
Anything that can be built in China can be build in Vietnam, the Philippines, Indonesia, and India.

Also I don't want to live in a world dominated by China, foreign policy issues take precedence over economic issues, we are talking about existential threats here.
 

lil devils x

🐐More Lego Goats Please!🐐
Legacy
May 1, 2020
3,330
1,045
118
Country
🐐USA🐐
Gender
♀
Anything that can be built in China can be build in Vietnam, the Philippines, Indonesia, and India.

Also I don't want to live in a world dominated by China, foreign policy issues take precedence over economic issues, we are talking about existential threats here.
That isn't true. Look at the rare minerals map. You can ONLY extract rare minerals where they exist. Also, you may not actually be able to have the same factories there, China is HUGE compared to all of those other nations. There are a number of factors that are considered when building new factories as well.
For example:
 

Silvanus

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 15, 2013
12,091
6,376
118
Country
United Kingdom
Also I don't want to live in a world dominated by China, foreign policy issues take precedence over economic issues, we are talking about existential threats here.
I'm pretty sure the 2 issues consistently considered genuine existential threats to the species by scientists are nuclear war and climate change, and the probability of annihilation through either one of them has been massively increased by the Republicans: through endless proliferation, brinkmanship and removing actually functional nuclear limitation treaties, and by shredding environmental protections, respectively.
 

Dwarvenhobble

Is on the Gin
May 26, 2020
6,014
665
118
Thanks for Humoring me


The Coronavirus and the Handling of it




Economy



Climate Change and the Environment




None of this was hidden. These are the same points he has been hammering over and over again.

But if you're just looking for his slogan? It's Build Back Better. What does that mean? All the things I linked to. His positions were made clear. America is hurting now.

Trump lost jobs



Trump fractures the American Union for political gain



And we're not even talking about how Trump directly used this four years to increase his wealth.


Being anti-harmful thing is as much of a platform than anyone ever needs. It's literally the only thing Republicans usually say when they are running. The horrible Left has turned this into an America that isn't yours. Isn't that bad? Isn't that unnatural? Isn't that hateful? Vote for me. I'm against that and I'll make sure it will change.

Hell, that was the platform Trump used to get in. Anti-Politician. Anti-Obama. Why is it suddenly not valid when it's applied to the first Orange American?

Whether you believe them or trust them isn't the same thing as him not stating his platform. He has clearly done so numerous times.
How often are those the focus of press conferences?

How often are they the focus of the actual messaging?


Again as the article I linked points out it's about designating an enemy.
 

Dwarvenhobble

Is on the Gin
May 26, 2020
6,014
665
118
That isn't a clear position. That's the epitome of a nebulous slogan.
True but it acted as a nice wrapper for the perceived positions he was taking.

E.G.
The fact this exists kind of pointing towards some of his policies vs his opponent seemingly not having solid ones.

 

Agema

Do everything and feel nothing
Legacy
Mar 3, 2009
9,212
6,483
118
The fact this exists kind of pointing towards some of his policies vs his opponent seemingly not having solid ones.
The election usually identified as the point where policy started drifting away was in 1960. It was pointed out then that Nixon sold detail, and JFK sold a dream: and JFK won.

Ever since then, the recognition has been that the precise whats and hows are less important than giving people a sense that the politician meets their ideals. Frankly, many voters wouldn't get the detail even if it were debated. They can grasp some simple numbers to illustrate stuff, but the technicalities of what a bill really means and what passing it would actually entail will simply induce a great, big blank. The art is therefore to catch a zeitgeist or feeling.

Obama came off the back of long grind. A dispiriting eight years of economic mediocrity ending in a crash, and two wars that after initial enthusiasm and success turned into draining slogs with no victory in sight (or even vision of what that victory would be). "Change" was simple and effective. Trump was really a great candidate for the anti-establishment 2016 election, after "change" turned out to be very little change at all, which surely made people question whether normal politics could deliver any. Unfortunately for him, now people have tasted beltway outsider they've found that they really don't like it, and a huge swathe of voters crave the reassuring stability of business as normal. So that's the dream Biden is there to sell: safe, boring normality.

I think that's why Trump took a significant poll dive after the first debate. Waverers needed to see a man who could be reasonable and responsible. What they saw was the same chaos they had become sick of. I bet you if in the third debate he could just keep a grip and have a reasonable back and forth debate without insults he'd go up in the polls even if he lost the arguments. However, I actually don't think he has the composure - he's too ingrained in his act. And it would still be too little, too late.
 

lil devils x

🐐More Lego Goats Please!🐐
Legacy
May 1, 2020
3,330
1,045
118
Country
🐐USA🐐
Gender
♀
Yea, Trump having a secret Chinese Bank account is going to be difficult to explain..
That and him paying China more in taxes than he paid the US. YIKES!

He may be bad at implementation like allies, but the mindset, if he has the mindset, and isn't just posturing for this election, is right.
Mindset to pay more in taxes to China than to the US?
 
Last edited:

dreng3

Elite Member
Aug 23, 2011
749
389
68
Country
Denmark
Yea, Trump having a secret Chinese Bank account is going to be difficult to explain..
Isn't the sad reality that Trump doesn't actually have to explain? He act outrageously all the time, lies, cheats, and breaks the law, but in the end he proffers no explanation and he still gets away with it.
 

Agema

Do everything and feel nothing
Legacy
Mar 3, 2009
9,212
6,483
118
Yea, Trump having a secret Chinese Bank account is going to be difficult to explain..
No, it's ludicrously easy to explain.

Trump wants to make money and doesn't care where or who he works with. He looked at the Pacific Rim like he looked at Russia, Middle East, etc. (and he probably needs to, because his reputation in the US financial world is trash so he might find financing relatively difficult at home). The Chinese outpost looked like it didn't achieve much.

It does however perhaps tell us something about Trump's anti-China crusade. Do you think he'd be raging at China if there were expensive Trump Hotels in Shanghai, Tianjin and Guangzhou?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrCalavera

lil devils x

🐐More Lego Goats Please!🐐
Legacy
May 1, 2020
3,330
1,045
118
Country
🐐USA🐐
Gender
♀
No, it's ludicrously easy to explain.

Trump wants to make money and doesn't care where or who he works with. He looked at the Pacific Rim like he looked at Russia, Middle East, etc. (and he probably needs to, because his reputation in the US financial world is trash so he might find financing relatively difficult at home). The Chinese outpost looked like it didn't achieve much.

It does however perhaps tell us something about Trump's anti-China crusade. Do you think he'd be raging at China if there were expensive Trump Hotels in Shanghai, Tianjin and Guangzhou?
He would rage against anyone if he thought it would work to his benefit. Trump caused US farmers and other businesses to go under, but as long as it is beneficial to him, he is for it.

 

Gergar12

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 24, 2020
3,921
864
118
Country
United States
That isn't true. Look at the rare minerals map. You can ONLY extract rare minerals where they exist. Also, you may not actually be able to have the same factories there, China is HUGE compared to all of those other nations. There are a number of factors that are considered when building new factories as well.
For example:
We can build up the infrastructure in the other countries with private FDI, and loans from the IMF, and World Bank, and even if this results in pain in the short term, it's better than letting the new Nazis grow in economic, and thus military might.

Also, you didn't mention India.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.