Drugs alsoYeah! Just like how mobsters use words like "rub out" and "remove", and since they're not actually saying the word "murder", they can't ever be convicted!
Drugs alsoYeah! Just like how mobsters use words like "rub out" and "remove", and since they're not actually saying the word "murder", they can't ever be convicted!
"I'm gonna need youse to move some merchand... I mean, sells some drugs, what are currently illegal in mosts joorisdickshuns."Drugs also
I'd be surprised if Trump was competent enough to not lose the election he's obviously lost. However, he's normally a lot of shenanigans, what happens if in a few administrations time someone similar but not hopeless is voted out but doesn't want to leave?It's pretty hard to see what Trump could do to stay in power at this point. States are and or have certified their votes and very few, if any, of the "Fraud" legal suits seem to have any merit or chance of convincing anyone but the Trumpkins.
There's the hypothetical of GOP legislators deciding to ignore their own certified votes and state laws and just send Trump electors to the EC but that seems like a pretty long shot at this point and would immediately turn into a massive shitshow at best, with every single person involved having their life and history under a national microscope.
At worst it triggers riots, lynching and civil war.
I do abide by equal rules for all. If you can find anything post it by all means.
Ah yes, those dastardly web users looking up public information, how dare. And the makers are saying to blacklist everyone on the list? They aren't? You're still paranoid? Whoulda guessed?
I don't know what rules you think you're operating on, but you clearly have out of whack priorities. Or you're here thinking the only thing that matters is rhetoric. You're trying to convince me that Trump supporters will be blacklisted, having shown literally 0 proof of it. Meanwhile Trump is actually bad and doing a bad and did a bad, but you think it's rhetorically identical despite it being massively different.
Or people looking to punish others don't use the specific word blacklist..........Yeah! Just like how mobsters use words like "rub out" and "remove", and since they're not actually saying the word "murder", they can't ever be convicted!
Yes, the problem is that you can't read.So to be clear
It's a Coup even though Trump hasn't said Coup and recent info says he's even now saying to work on the Transition in even though he believes he will win
But despite people being shown to have tried to make lists and said they want people entirely deplatformed and Blackballed it doesn't count as attempts to Blacklist Trump supporters because they didn't say the specific words blacklist.
DO YOU SEE THE PROBLEM HERE YET?
Hey Dwarvenhobble. Is this something we can all agree on?Or people looking to punish others don't use the specific word blacklist..........
Yes, the problem is that you can't read.
I said attempted coup for a reason, because it was attempted.
Googling that it seems some of the GOP were using the Sideshow Bob defence for reals for another issue last year, though.Sideshow Bob said:Attempted murder. Now honestly what is that? Can you win a Nobel Prize for attempted chemistry?
yes assuming he believed the spiel he put out thereHey Dwarvenhobble. Is this something we can all agree on?
Was Hitler a racist?
Surely you must be kidding, I thought people knew better by now... Hitler was clearly a Hero hired by the German military to become Chancellor and rid the world of an evil Globalist Pedophile Cabal. He even went on to heroically declare wars to nations refusing to take down their pedophile elites. And when he lost the war the evil Allies fabricated camps and planted corpses of victims of the Globalist Pedophile Elite Network in them. Just saw a segment on Qanon so I couldn't resist ...Hey Dwarvenhobble. Is this something we can all agree on?
Was Hitler a racist?
*check notes*yes assuming he believed the spiel he put out there
Under the rules of "Unless they say the exact words it doesn't count" which is the rules others seem to want to apply here it wouldn't.So do you also think that Pinochet's seizure of power wasn't a coup because he never used that specific word?
Nice to see you getting the point I've been making about the ridiculous double standard at play.*check notes*
Pretty sure Hitler never called himself racist. So how is it possible for you to call him racist? If he didnt say it, he cant possibly be racist
I think the term you are looking for is Eugenicist. Race Realism is a term only for the last 40ish years and thus cannot possible be retroactively applied to Hitler.Hitler was a Race Realist obviously. He was also an Ethnostate Nationalist, which totally isn't racist fascist at all.
So... no coup has happened ever. I'll be sure to let everyone know about the new rulesUnder the rules of "Unless they say the exact words it doesn't count" which is the rules others seem to want to apply here it wouldn't.
It was one though.
Just like Trump's was as anyone could have predicted likely bluster.
Nice to see you getting the point I've been making about the ridiculous double standard at play.
Yes.Ultimately he will leave office?
Uhrm... you've got two sets of untrue statements mixed up. The investigation was sparked by Flynn lying to V.P. Pence and Sean Spicer, which James Comey discovered (lie #1). During the investigation, he then lied to the FBI (lie #2).You're still imagining an impossible series of events. The discovery of untrue statements cannot spark the investigation that "discovered" them. That just isn't how cause and effect works.
It depends how you look at it. Flynn was already a "person of interest" to the FBI over previous Russia links. The FBI was looking at closing that down as nothing had turned up that it saw was incriminating, until the Flynn-Kislyak calls emerged which caused considerable concern.Uhrm... you've got two sets of untrue statements mixed up. The investigation was sparked by Flynn lying to V.P. Pence and Sean Spicer, which James Comey discovered (lie #1). During the investigation, he then lied to the FBI (lie #2).
I know, it's hard to keep it all straight, what with such a huge amount of lying.
"Tricked into" a guilty plea that he then stuck with for 2 years until just before sentencing. Sure thing.I love it how ye just ignore what happened in favor of your favorite "they're all stupid and incompetent" argument, as if the general wasn't tricked into a confession in favor of a plea deal, which was then taken off the table.