What a coincidence, then, that Matt Braynard, in his efforts to speak to actual people who were registered as voting, found significant numbers of people who never requested ballots, or their ballots weren't counted, or their ballots were counted when they claimed to have never sent one in, or people fraudulently registered impossible addresses as residences. Maybe that's that other different thing you're talking about.
So, once again, it's just an appeal to incredulity. People can't possibly feel differently to you about how the last four years have gone, so they can't have voted the way the numbers show.
An irregularity doesn't mean that a thing definitely did not happen. That would be an appeal to incredulity.
Matt Braynard himself describes the numbers as "trace". The only way he's made it look significant is as a percentage of the people he's established contact with... and I've already explained how he massaged that statistic by only requesting a call-back from people who fit the data he's looking for.
He used the word "trace" to describe one aspect of one of his findings, the Low Activity Analysis.
Oh man of the past, for whom research is tomorrow's problem, we here in the future call tomorrow today and we do research. The very "data" gathered by Matt Braynard was in fact not gathered by Matt Braynard, but instead by a college professor named Steven Miller. Mr. Miller also openly admits the data is flawed, and has disavowed it. Fear not knowledge man of the past, for it is the only way you will catch up to reality.
Ahhh, so it helps his case to find very little evidence! Very smart. That's some next-level stat-manipulation.
Oh man of the past, for whom reality is filled with bias toward facts, fear not the words of ignorant! For in the very article I showed you the man himself who gathered the data, who saw his own data, says the data is flawed. Matt Braynard's claims the data is not flawed are ignorant, for the man who gathered the data says the data is flawed. And indeed Braynard's claim he didn't use Mr Miller or his work is also ignorant for he spoke of it!
Matt bought the data directly from the states themselves. If the data that the states have is bad, then that's just even more grounds to claim that the election was conducted improperly.
Oh man of the past, for whom the legal system and the definition of "indisputable" are someone else's concerns, fear not knowing things. We here in the future take pride in out understanding of words, and their meanings.
whyy.org
Yes, you have a twitter user saying "this seems sketchy"! Wow, time to throw the whole thing out!And we also came to the conclusion that the very people who were called by the Voter Integrity Fund say the calls are misleading, and that they assume anyone who even answer the phone had a fraudulent ballot cast.
Former Trump staffer fishing for fraud with cold calls to Pa. voters is short on proof
A former high-level Trump campaign staffer is crowdfunding an effort to use a call center to fish for accounts of voter fraud in Pennsylvania and other swing states.
I can't even remember if we're still waiting for him to release his tax returns.
...I don't know, do they still have irony in yours?
We shouldn't mock the man from the past. He is lost and scared; frightened of a world filled with facts, and understandably upset he has to relearn a lot. The best we can do for him is continue to disprove his theories. He's only 3 weeks behind us, he'll catch up sooner or later and realize all the hoaxes he believes are hoaxes.
Do you actually believe all this shit? Or are you just putting it up for entertainment?
Entertainment. I hope Trump will succeed like I hope a character in a show will succeed.
He asked "X or Y?" And I answered Y.
