I'm posting Election Aftermath news, it's all on topic!Surprised that this thread hasn't been locked.
I'm posting Election Aftermath news, it's all on topic!Surprised that this thread hasn't been locked.
We’re trying bro. We’re trying.Surprised that this thread hasn't been locked.
That's why they want to flip more than a state or two.Even if they did find evidence of fraud and reflip a state or two, Donald will still not have enough electoral votes.
Good luck with that, bro. Most of the evidence points to just basic human error, not evil widespread fraud that would have been easy to spot and trace. You know that you don't have anything when even Fox News doesn't seem to care about the votes.That's why they want to flip more than a state or two.
With no evidence. After losing the election. After every state has been certified.That's why they want to flip more than a state or two.
Ward’s lawsuit contained no evidence of her allegations, and she asked Warner to allow her to examine duplicated ballots and the signatures on the envelopes used to mail early ballots. Warner agreed to let her examine 100 of each, and after attorneys found two duplicated ballots that mistakenly subtracted votes from Trump, the county agreed to let them examine up to 2,500 more.
Attorneys and election officials were able to examine 1,526 additional ballots on Wednesday. And the results didn’t bode well for Ward’s attempt to show that improperly duplicated ballots may have cost Trump the race in Arizona.
Nine of the 1,626 duplicate ballots examined had errors — seven of which cost Trump votes and two that took votes from Biden. Scott Jarrett, Maricopa County’s director of election day voting, testified on Thursday that if that error rate were applied to the nearly 28,000 total duplicated ballots cast in the county, Trump would gain a mere 103 votes.
Biden won Arizona by 10,457 votes.
Some witness. A lot of witness have a totally different account. They were there too. Where were you?Not according to witness accounts. Sorry, it's your word against all of theirs. They were there. Where were you?
Which witnesses contradict that democrats cheered when they were escorted out?Some witness. A lot of witness have a totally different account.
I think you under-estimate the potential for damages from rumours spread round. Especially rumours about very well off people lol.Sorry, forgot the other issue with 230. Since libel and copyright laws are based on damages to reputation and earnings, the average person pretty much cannot claim much in damages. Also, litigation costs a whole heap, keeping the chance of litigation out of the hands of the average person.
230 wouldn't stop any of the Cancelling. It would just make sure only rich people do it. And the average person are free targets you can take out without consequences
You're very trying yes.We’re trying bro. We’re trying.
Wasn't that deemed to have been made up?So like when are we getting Donald Trumps pee tape? Might as well release it to humiliate him more.
Does cheering prove facts now?Which witnesses contradict that democrats cheered when they were escorted out?
...Yes, cheering is exactly the sort of thing that proves bias.Does cheering prove facts now?
The Dems, Rep and Independent observers who were also there...Yes, cheering is exactly the sort of thing that proves bias.
Will you answer my question? Which witnesses had those "totally different accounts"?
Names?The Dems, Rep and Independent observers who were also there
The fact you equate state authorities killing a civilian with hurt feelings of the right wing, shows how utterly morally bankrupt you are. You sicken me.As Agema says " Maybe theRepublican poll watchersGeorge Floyd shouldn't have brokenregulationsthe law and gotthemselves thrown outhimself killed"
Blame the victims, like Agema does. Don't ever stop to think that the system might allow for unequal enforcement.
Passive aggressive puns are the highest form of wit comprehended by the denizens of TERF island. Such is the result of centuries of inbreeding.You're very trying yes.