If you don't know how feminist-themed critiques pushes buttons then we may have lot to catch up on. So, to begin with here's the typical feminist sales pitches:
"Feminism is the radical notion that women should be treated like people"
"Feminism is about equality"
"If you're for womens'...
"This guy...amiright? Super far off topic here. It's cool though."
Actually, I started on-topic and then I trailed off into moaning about the typical vegan spiel on how meat is murder. Hopefully I can get some credit where it's due that it's been working.
"Exploitation of who exactly?"...
I was hoping that it was pretty clear that I was talking about a privileged modern society, how can it be taken that I possibly meant one that's literally centuries old where there was valid reliance on animals? I really hate it when people bring up either some historical or obscure group that...
1) Pollutant.
"I am 98% sure that Denmark is about as non-polluting as one can be and still have sustainable (as in provides enough food both for the citizens of the country and for export) farming. Whatever other countries do, we can't be held responsible for. And if there are places to be...
I'm around again and now the comments are starting to give me a headache due to their content (not talking about you btw).Time to finally get around to your response.
"Pollutes?
Well that must be the US industry then, which means I can't do anything about that, for the simple reason that...
"Meat is a luxury article that contributes to pollution and animal abuse (greatly depending on the amount of cash you want to pay for your meat). Like so many luxury things it would be a lot better to completely go without it, that's true. But the same goes for electronics (do you really need a...
Despite being a vegan I'm generally skeptical of these kind of claims that go either way. Meat is bad for you, meat is good for you. Whatever.In either case vegan's and vegetarian's could cite this study all we like to try and convince people that they should stop but ultimately we don't really...
No, it's really not. If anything, it's a lot more like painting on the frame or beside it. There is still noticeably damage done, but not to the actual piece its self. And I didn't list your other examples because it would be incredibly redundant. Don't talk to me about class when you wished...
False equivalence. Vandalizing the Mona Lisa would involve legitimately altering the painting its self as opposed to keeping the actual picture intact and basically putting a message beside it. I'm liking on how we put more value on soil than actual animal life and the environment, so I guess...
OT: Fuck Greenpeace. I hope everyone involved in this disrespectful ass-nugget of a stunt gets put away for the rest of their lives.
Vandalism = Life sentence. Sorry, but regardless of the value we put on a few lines in the sand they're still just lines in the sand. And the lines them selves...
"Oh please. A few rodents being used for legitimate medical experimentation in no way justifies attempted bombings of labs(because thankfully most animal rights terrorists are too moronic to actually succeed), attacking scientists, destroying their homes and other property, digging up the...
Looks like I made someone angry. Except, anti-vivisectionists and animal rights terrorists have some legitimate justification for their anger, or are you completely blind to the actual suffering that goes on completely unwarranted? I provide a better solution, and one with a more dumber...
You people care more about robin Williams than the 58 billion animals that die pointlessly so you can stuff your face, the 30 million animals that are pointlessly made into fur coats so someone can inform us that they're a terribly shallow human being, and the countless animals that die...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.