You know absolutely nothing about what goes on over here. Absolutely nothing.We all saw what happened when DEI was removed.
You know absolutely nothing about what goes on over here. Absolutely nothing.We all saw what happened when DEI was removed.
The issue is that I don't have rose-tinted glasses. Most non-Americans can see better than Americans because we dont have the US propaganda machine spewing nonsense at us for 40 yearsYou know absolutely nothing about what goes on over here. Absolutely nothing.
Yes you do, as well as other nations' propaganda machines. The difference is that you have zero personal experience to help see through the propaganda....we dont have the US propaganda machine spewing nonsense at us for 40 years...
Arm everyone. This is the solution.View attachment 13144
Since the memo was issued, CBS News reports the Trump administration has signed 456 agreements with local police departments, letting them act as immigration officers — turning traffic stops and routine patrols into immigration raids.
Ryan Shapiro, executive director of Property of the People, put it bluntly: “The documents reveal the Trump administration has authorized every single law enforcement officer in the country, including traffic cops, to engage in immigrant roundups explicitly outside due process.”
![]()
ICE Can Now Enter Your Home Without a Warrant to Look for Migrants, DOJ Memo Says
A new memo from the Trump administration reveals something shocking: ICE agents have been told they can enter homes without a warrant to arrest migrants, based on little more than suspicion.dailyboulder.com
When I saw an ultra devout Mormon wingman was helping Elon Musk build his secret baby empire, I knew I had to dig in.
In this video, I connect the dots between Elon’s “world-saving” baby legion, and Joseph Smith’s secretive plural marriages meant to “multiply and replenish the earth.” I focus on Jared Birchall, Musk’s Mormon fixer, and how deeply Mormon ideas about family, patriarchy, secrecy, and control show up here. It’s messier (and eerier) than you think — let's get into it.
~~~~~~~~
A few resources I mention in the video:
WSJ Article that broke the story about Ashley St. Clair and covers Jared Birchall: https://www.wsj.com/politics/elon-mus...
Reddit thread responding to Ashely St. Clair Story: https://www.reddit.com/r/popculturech...
Mormon scripture about polygamy: https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/s...
Doctrine and Covenants 132
Revelation given through Joseph Smith the Prophet, at Nauvoo, Illinois, recorded July 12, 1843, relating to the new and everlasting covenant, including the eternity of the marriage covenant and the principle of plural marriage. Although the revelation was recorded in 1843, evidence indicates...www.churchofjesuschrist.org
Explanation of what happens in a Mormon temple:• The Day I Realized I Was in a Cult
Mormon essay about the commandment to practice polygamy: https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/s...
Doctrine and Covenants 132
Revelation given through Joseph Smith the Prophet, at Nauvoo, Illinois, recorded July 12, 1843, relating to the new and everlasting covenant, including the eternity of the marriage covenant and the principle of plural marriage. Although the revelation was recorded in 1843, evidence indicates...www.churchofjesuschrist.org
Birchall’s termination from Merrill Lynch: https://brokercheck.finra.org/individ...
BrokerCheck - Find a broker, investment or financial advisor
BrokerCheck is a trusted tool that shows you employment history, certifications, licenses, and any violations for brokers and investment advisors.brokercheck.finra.org
Business Insider article about Jared Birchall’s connection to Elon Musk: https://www.businessinsider.com/meet-...
![]()
Jared Birchall, Elon Musk's right-hand man, is a buttoned-up former banker whose loyalty has few limits
The impulsive billionaire's confidante is the most straight-laced man you'll ever meet, his former colleagues and neighbors told Insider.www.businessinsider.com
Daily Mail profile on Jared Birchall: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/21/us...
![]()
White House Assesses Ways to Persuade Women to Have More Children
Baby bonuses and menstrual cycle classes are among the ideas pitched to Trump aides as they consider plans to try boosting the birthrate.www.nytimes.com
Deseret News profile on Jared Birchall :https://www.deseret.com/faith/2022/7/...
![]()
Who is Jared Birchall? BYU grad, Latter-day Saint is top adviser to Elon Musk, world’s richest man
Learn more about BYU grade and Latter-day Saint Jared Birchall, a wealth manager and right hand man to Elon Musk, the richest man in the world.www.deseret.com
Salt Lake Tribune commentary on Jared Birchall: https://www.sltrib.com/religion/2022/...
![]()
Latest from Mormon Land: Elon Musk’s wingman is LDS; Dallin Oaks says to avoid extremism
In the latest news in and about The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, we report that Elon Musk's main financial manager is a Latter-day Saint; apostle Dallin Oaks' counsel to condemn racism and avoid extremism; apostle David Bednar's invitation to speak at the National Press Club and...www.sltrib.com
Wikipedia page about Jared Birchall: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_B...
Jared Birchall - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
American slavery was unambiguously racist. Counting slaves - who cannot vote - as population for democratic representation is a form of profiting from slavery. Especially in maginifying the voting power of slaveholders, who could then use it to maintain slavery and very likely not for the best interest of slaves. The three-fifths compromise thus amounts to not letting slaveowners profit from slavery as much as they'd like to have done. The three-fifths compromise was thus racist and discriminatory.Then tell me any part of what I said that was inaccurate.
If your argument is that the three-fifths compromise was racist for allowing slaveholders a fraction of the power they'd have otherwise, then the argument is that it was not discriminatory enough. The perspective people were offering was that its racist to count slaves as less than a person, but the only reasonable position to say the compromise was bad is by saying it was actually problematic to count slaves as more than zero.American slavery was unambiguously racist. Counting slaves - who cannot vote - as population for democratic representation is a form of profiting from slavery. Especially in maginifying the voting power of slaveholders, who could then use it to maintain slavery and very likely not for the best interest of slaves. The three-fifths compromise thus amounts to not letting slaveowners profit from slavery as much as they'd like to have done. The three-fifths compromise was thus racist and discriminatory.
Maybe fascism will work THIS time guys! Everybody loves being oppressed more, it's how nations prosper!If your argument is that the three-fifths compromise was racist for allowing slaveholders a fraction of the power they'd have otherwise, then the argument is that it was not discriminatory enough. The perspective people were offering was that its racist to count slaves as less than a person, but the only reasonable position to say the compromise was bad is by saying it was actually problematic to count slaves as more than zero.
Ultimately, the point here is that the truth of the matter is a little unintuitive, the people back then who were arguing to count slaves as full people were the ones enslaving them. Which is, quite accidentally, a pretty apt comparison to the current debate about DEI after all. Politicians and activists are pushing arguments that do not serve to benefit the marginalized at all, but rather just win those same politicians political power carried on the backs of the people they are using rather than helping. It's simple to try to say that someone opposing diversity initiatives must hate non-white people just the same way as its simple to say that the people trying not to count slaves in the population must think of slaves as sub-human, but the reality of the situation is that both of those intuitive conclusions are completely backwards.
And the thing I am really excited to see is how you all react if things just work out. People not just in the US but globally are voting in conservative politicians, what do you do if your boogeymen succeed and nations prosper? What do you say if racial minorities thrive under Trump? What do you say if migration slows down globally and the global south begins to stand on its own. What do you say if people happily embrace religion again? If abortions stop? If crime falls? You all seem utterly unprepared for even the possibility that things could get better, and I am excited to see who here is wise enough to catch on first.
That satire is not just about one side, it's about both sides. That's what It's Always Sunny political episodes are about. It even says in the quote there that Mac could use an argument based in fact, but he can't change their mind. Same thing with the gun episode (Gun Fever Too: Still Hot) where 2 of them are opposed to gun control and the other 2 are pro gun control and then both sides end up with the opposite perspective at the end of the episode and thus the episode shows the arguments on both sides. Similar the Trump/Biden election episode where the episode completely avoids being pro democratic or republican. Right now, neither side would even entertain that the other side might be right about just one fucking thing ever. Hence, why schools were closed for 18 months by democrats all because orange man said to open schools."I'm not gonna stand here, present some egghead scientific argument based on fact. I'm just a regular dude; I like to drink beer, y'know? I love my family; 'rock, flag, and eagle,' right, Charlie? You see, Charlie? These liberals are trying to assassinate my character. I can't change their mind; I won't change my mind, because I don't have to! Because I'm an American. I won't change my mind on anything, regardless of the facts that are set out before me. I'm dug in, and I'll never change."
Ronald McDonald (aka: "Mac"), It's Always Sunny In Philadelphia, S8:Ep.10, c. 2012I know The Simpsons is famous for predicting shit well before it comes to fruition, but hats off to IASIP in this case. This was written as satire in 2012, satirizing a ridiculously moronic, ignorant, and stubborn mindset, but sadly, this might as well be the very real and unironic rantings of any MAGA cultist today, 13 years later.
What the hell are you even talking about? DEI hardly changes anything, it's a joke of a policy. Trump appointed the 1st Indian as FBI Director, an Egyptian is head of the FDA, and an Indian is head of the NIH. There's hardly anyone that cares about race when hiring. You really think our government went from complete competence to complete incompetence because DEI was dropped? That's fucking crazy ass shit if you actually believe that.We all saw what happened when DEI was removed. Very incompetent white people got jobs they should never have had access to because they are talentless hacks
Trump wasn't worried about DEI being racist. He was worried about POC being more talented than some white people and that was unfair
It was the exploitation of slaves for the benefit of slaveowners. The fact that you and that tool in Indiana don't seem to be able or willing to acknowledge it as such is why we're into the territory of racism. The you both seem to want to play with sophistry to pretend otherwise just makes that even clearer.Ultimately, the point here is that the truth of the matter is a little unintuitive, the people back then who were arguing to count slaves as full people were the ones enslaving them.
The right currently offers neoliberalism and authoritarian populism. Neoliberalism is the status quo that has been failing our societies for decades. The populism is a reaction to that, and comes in the form of either authoritarianism and incompetence or an anti-woke facade for turbocharged neoliberalism (or both).And the thing I am really excited to see is how you all react if things just work out.
Work out for who, precisely? Only people who are exactly like you? We've had that before, and it absolutely sucked for everyone else.And the thing I am really excited to see is how you all react if things just work out.
What are we not acknowledging? We are in agreement that slavery is bad, we are championing those people who fought against slavery and the influence of slavers. Don't forget, the right to vote was limited everywhere to essentially white male property owners, the north had its share of disenfranchised peoples as well as the south, but the south with its slave population was uniquely weakened by the rule taking away some of the representation that would otherwise be due to their population. Under the 3/5ths compromise, a state would get more representation in Congress (without any change to the voting population) if they stopped buying slaves and hired free poor people instead. It politically discouraged slave owning.It was the exploitation of slaves for the benefit of slaveowners. The fact that you and that tool in Indiana don't seem to be able or willing to acknowledge it as such is why we're into the territory of racism.
I think your commitment to the resentment of right-wing people makes you incapable of seeing any positives.I am perfectly open to the idea that the right might hit upon a solution to the world's problems. I just don't see any that give me any confidence.
The post you quoted answered this question several times over, which you then snipped out to offer your own disingenuous nonsense.Work out for who, precisely? Only people who are exactly like you? We've had that before, and it absolutely sucked for everyone else.
Or conservatism isn't fascism, or anything even resembling fascism to anyone who has not completely lost their mind.Maybe fascism will work THIS time guys! Everybody loves being oppressed more, it's how nations prosper!
I understand that you've totally lost your mind, you don't need to document it further.It's not facism, really! Please ignore our supporters' waiving of swastika flags and hailing Hitler.
"You've completely proven me wrong, so I have to dismiss your argument out-of-hand to save face."I understand that you've totally lost your mind, you don't need to document it further.
His post is pure face-plant."You've completely proven me wrong, so I have to dismiss your argument out-of-hand to save face."