10-Year-Old Borrows Steamy Gay Sex Manga From Local Library
- Thread starter The Wooster
- Start date
She is 10.Meaning of Karma said:
And I don't think libraries are allowed to stock pornographic content - they should at least put it in a "restricted" section.
I'm not going to debate whether we should let kids view porno, I have no opinion actually, but current social norms say no.
All I can think is "Why the Hell doesn't my local library have steamy gay sex manga?" Sure they can have a wall full of books about planes that are so unread they actually have dust on them, but not a single steamy gay sex manga! Or steamy gay anything!
It's bullshit, is what it is.
It's bullshit, is what it is.
"Adult Non-Fiction"? Really?
This is the part that actually bothers me. I would be totaly on the library's side if it wasn't for that small part. It is reasonable for library to have wide range of content. The way they classify it, on the other hand, it really questionable.
Reminds me of the late 90s and the beginning of 2000-2001. Back in here it was very common to see stuff like Pokemon and Sailor Moon placed right next to Jin-roh, Ninja Scroll and freakin Urotsukidoji CDs. It is not really suprising that a large number of people still consider anime to mostly consist of tentacle rape.
This is the part that actually bothers me. I would be totaly on the library's side if it wasn't for that small part. It is reasonable for library to have wide range of content. The way they classify it, on the other hand, it really questionable.
Reminds me of the late 90s and the beginning of 2000-2001. Back in here it was very common to see stuff like Pokemon and Sailor Moon placed right next to Jin-roh, Ninja Scroll and freakin Urotsukidoji CDs. It is not really suprising that a large number of people still consider anime to mostly consist of tentacle rape.
I certainly wouldn't borrow porn at a library. Who knows what person had it before...
Also, while I find it rather prude to "protect children from anything remotely sexual", there are things children just shouldn't have to see, even if they think they want to.
Also, while I find it rather prude to "protect children from anything remotely sexual", there are things children just shouldn't have to see, even if they think they want to.
"The genre, which is dominated by female authors, is known for romanticizing aggressive and sometimes non-consensual sex. It's sometimes gets a bit rapey, in other words."
Is that what women like? What the fuck.
I guess I've been doing it wrong.
Is that what women like? What the fuck.
I guess I've been doing it wrong.
I bet the book was confusing to him a first, but never got the meaning of it. He is ten, can be gay and 10? I don't know if homosexuality begins that early.
No one really cares whether a library stocks certain titles. Just that those titles shouldnt be stored where a child can get to it.....i thought that would be common sense? Accidents happen and someone could have mis filed it, knowing the age of people that work at libraries im sure they looked at the cover, thought "comic" and put it with the others.
I was brought to the public library under adult supervision at age 10. That kind of independence wasn't granted to me until age 12-13.dyre said:
10 seems too early to me.
It's probably more of a case-by-case thing. If you've got a responsible, intelligent kid or you happen to live next to a library, you're probably more likely to let him go alone than if you've got an idiot kid or if the library is halfway across town.-Dragmire- said:
The story wouldn't really be different if the kid was 12 though. I think 11 was my first year in the library unsupervised, since that's when I started junior high school (I think).