Hardcore_gamer said:
VicunaBlue said:
PayJ567 said:
when did the justice system become like parents?
Seconded. The justice department's job is to keep criminals off the streets, not to try to teach them morals.
Wait what? I though the whole purpose of sending them to prison was to make them regret there actions and that crime doesn't pay. Doesn't that count as teaching them morals?
I realize you were probably being sarcastic, but in reality the only thing the majority of young offenders learn in prison is how to be better criminals. For a lot of these kids its their only choice, adapt or die. I'm not boo-hooing anyone, they all made their choices just like I made my choice to track them down and arrest them for a living.
Unfortunately a lot of people rely on the justice system to try and parent their kids for them, thinking a little jail time will straighten them out, or they've just given up. I don't buy into the whole "There's no such thing as a bad kid" bullshit, I've seen absolute monsters come from perfectly normal (on the outside anyway) families where Mom and Dad both have jobs, there's no abuse except maybe ignorance, and yet the kid is just naturally fucked up.
Other than being a nifty headline to start forum discussions, the judge's decision to use a Wii as a bail option for a young offender doesn't hold any weight. A material object, a
toy doesn't have much importance to a kid who outright attacks both other children and adults. Its obvious he doesn't have much, if any respect or fear of authority figures, and his lawyer saying anything different is just a lawyer protecting his client. What I think we have here is a potentially dangerous sociopath who needs some serious therapy, not a little slap on the wrist like having his video game taken away. Jail time isn't the answer either.
I'll be completely gobsmacked if this actually works.