Somewhere in the depths of flash-game hell, a Zynga executive is reading this story and doing a celebratory fist pump.
Seriously though, this is a story that is refreshing to read for several reasons.
1. She blamed her son and not the game.
2. She isn't suing them for a rediculous amount of money, or any for that matter.
3. The son is out $440 dollars, so it isn't just on the parents' shoulders. He's probably going to have to work to pay his parents back.
4. The mother isn't technologically-retarded (IE: she could easily set a password on the computer and change the number on her credit card)
Seriously though, this is a story that is refreshing to read for several reasons.
1. She blamed her son and not the game.
2. She isn't suing them for a rediculous amount of money, or any for that matter.
3. The son is out $440 dollars, so it isn't just on the parents' shoulders. He's probably going to have to work to pay his parents back.
4. The mother isn't technologically-retarded (IE: she could easily set a password on the computer and change the number on her credit card)