15-year old Stabs Bully 11 Times at Bus Stop, Gets Away With It

Recommended Videos

zentario

New member
Aug 24, 2011
7
0
0
Use_Imagination_here said:
What should you do, let him beat the living shit out of you?
I think the most people can't imagine this type of needless escalation. They seem not to live in areas where this type of behavior is "usually" happening.

Why did the school, the community allow a 15y a) to "gang up" and b) to start harassing 11y olds? Where were the families here? I'm sure, there is now a wide discussion in this community how this escalated to this point. The mother of the dead boy is now big in victimization, as they always are, when their "good kid" got "a way too strong" reaction from people they harass for month, even years. Where was her judgment before?

It seems the 11y old had nobody to talk to, because its assumed that if you are bullied you have to take it out yourself? I would understand a 1:1 fight between seemingly fair built "fighting partners". But bullies never use this logic, because they "get it on" creating fear and spreading hate. They select someone who will not fight back, or, expecting no serious reactions. 2:1 or even 3:1 has started to have criminal implications in some countries. So I don't get the escalation.

I see the community, their families, at major fault for this escalation. Where I live, you do that "gang up thing" exactly one time. When you have to get up 2 hours early because no school in 2 hours range will take you with this attitude. Some kids start to think about their behavior, even the most sociopaths bully becomes "tame" when he returns from a two weeks stint at that "reception camp" (only cynics call it a school).

Knifing someone to a 2:1 or 3:1 is not much extreme. He had to expect long term damage. If the community can't give any other means to resolve this, then the judge was right: he applied the "logic" this community told the young boy to solve this.
 

samaugsch

New member
Oct 13, 2010
595
0
0
Here's what I think:

I'm mostly siding with the kid here. Sure, he went overboard, but hey, the bully kind of had it coming. It probably would've been better if he had threatened the bully with the knife first before resorting to force, but people do irrational things when they're angry enough. I certainly wouldn't put what he's done in league with a killer who actively looks for innocent, defenseless bystanders. Just give the kid some counseling.
 

gwilym101

New member
Sep 12, 2011
45
0
0
This is clearly a case of battered person syndrome. The bullied person could not comprehend when they were out of danger so just kept attacking in percieved self defence. People have done far worse than this under this syndrome.
 

Griffolion

Elite Member
Aug 18, 2009
2,205
0
41
There's so many unknown factors regarding the mental state of Jorge and how the bullying had affected him. Either way, something in him caused him to snap and act how he did.

Ultimately this situation is just so sad.
 

wooty

Vi Britannia
Aug 1, 2009
4,252
0
0
I would say going all out to kill someone over bullying is a tad extreme really, but I cant speak as to what extent the bullying went to.

Stabbings not the answer, but having been bullied in the past before and dealing with it in a slightly extreme way, even I dont really look forward to the day when I have to brandish this baby at scumbags again

Weapon of choice:-
[http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/221/cricket02.jpg/]
 

senordesol

New member
Oct 12, 2009
1,301
0
0
Shycte said:
Chill the fuck out. Go outside and take a sip of air, there isn't any reason to start getting worked up about it so take it easy okay? First of all, you don't know a fuck about me and please don't think you do. Okay? Stop jumping to conclusions about me, because this is the internet, and the thing about the internet is that you don't know shit about anyone.

Thing is, I'm not going to judge if it was self-defence or not, I don't think it's logical to stab someone 11 times because I'm pretty sure that the 15-year old kid who died wasn't exactly making much recistance after the tenth time. A judge in Florida said that according to U.S law it was self-defence so I guess we have to buy that. What I think should count as a reasonable amount of violence is another thing, don't mix those two up.

Here is the thing I'm annoyed by, people that said that the 15 year old kid deserved to die or that he had it coming. I'm not saying that you've said, but several people have. Somewhere in this world a mother is crying because her son were stabbed to death, I want people to remember that side of this coin.
I am one of those people who says he had it coming and I have a pretty specific reason why. If you go out of your way to terrorize a boy, particularly when he is trying to avoid you, and then assault him; you are demonstrating a very particular malice of forethought and willful disregard for your victim's soundness and safety. If this had been a bobcat he had backed into a corner, no one would have been the least bit shocked if he got mauled.

He not only sought a confrontation, he FORCED a confrontation, and if things had gone just a tad differently it could have very well been the victim's mother shedding tears for her dead or critically injured boy. There was no reason to attack the kid. NONE. There was no reason to chase him off the bus. There was no reason to punch him in the back of the head. Had he decided against any of that, he'd still be alive today. He made a series of senseless, violent, evil choices and wound up bearing the ultimate consequence of those choices.

If only the universe were so just in every case.
 

Imperium9990

New member
Jul 24, 2011
41
0
0
Man I love justice. The most satisfying feeling ever. That kid killing the bully has made the world a slightly better place. I know my day has brightened because of it.
 

TheVioletBandit

New member
Oct 2, 2011
579
0
0
I fully agree with the judges ruling. One must have a right to defend themselves against the threat of physical violence. In my high-school some bullies jumped a kid in the hall way, and during the struggle the victim's head hit the floor with enough force that it killed him instantly. There is no logical reason to assume you will not be killed or hurt during a fight, and so you have a right to meet your attackers with deadly force if necessary. This boy obviously tried to avoid the confrontation and when this failed he used the only weapon at his disposal to defend himself. I don't mean to sound callous but the bully sought out a physical confrontation and he got one.
 

Negatempest

New member
May 10, 2008
1,003
0
0
Hmm. So Forest Gump being chased by a vehicle by a group of individuals with the sole purpose of doing bodily harm do not deserve retaliation if possible? The kid was 1 vs a group. It's already a handicap against his favor. We boo such moments when they appear on movies, books, and TV and are happy when they get their come-up-ins.

"He stabbed 11 times." And? What did you expect him to do being chased out of the bus by a group of individuals. Stab the guy once and "hope" he doesn't get the **** beat out of him by the other guys? Some of you tend to forget that the bully was not alone.

"But momma is gonna cry." Well I see a mother who did not pay attention to her child when he was an obvious douche to class mates in a physical way. So why pity a mother who seemed to not care about what her son was doing behind her back?
 

BrassButtons

New member
Nov 17, 2009
564
0
0
Wilfy said:
BrassButtons said:
Wilfy said:
But I personally would say 12 stabs is excessive for any fight.
Based on what?
Based on my personal opinion.
Yes, I got that this was your opinion. I'm asking why I should think your opinion is correct. If you don't have any data to support it (and at this point I think it's safe to assume you don't) then aren't you basically just making stuff up? You're declaring 12 stabs to be excessive, because you've decided, based on nothing, that it is. That's like if I declared that in my opinion snakes are mammals. Calling something an opinion does not make it correct.
 

Sharp Blue

New member
Dec 29, 2011
34
0
0
I fought my bully, straight up fistfight, we drew. Later on he comlemented me on my guts and vouched for me, we became friends, he was messed up and needed to take it out on somebody, I sorta didn't let him.

I realize it was self defence and respect the court ruling, but I seriously dislike that the kid used a knife, it seems unfair like it could have been planned, probibly wasn't though...
 

true story

New member
Oct 17, 2008
25
0
0
wooty said:
I would say going all out to kill someone over bullying is a tad extreme really, but I cant speak as to what extent the bullying went to.

Stabbings not the answer, but having been bullied in the past before and dealing with it in a slightly extreme way, even I dont really look forward to the day when I have to brandish this baby at scumbags again

Weapon of choice:-
[http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/221/cricket02.jpg/]
so is that some kind of fancy non dildo dildo?
 

Imperium9990

New member
Jul 24, 2011
41
0
0
Official Case Report. The bully was punching the kid, and calling for his friends to jump him. Bastard deserved to die.

http://media.naplesnews.com/media/static/20111230150108.pdf
 

Havok2099

New member
Aug 24, 2011
18
0
0
Ugh, this is a hard thing to weigh in on. On one hand, the bullied kid had to react somehow, but on the other even if the biggest asshole in my school died, I'd still hardly say he deserved it. So I guess I'd side with the judge on this one, it's such a moral gray case that just rollin' with what the law says is the best I can think of.
 

Sharp Blue

New member
Dec 29, 2011
34
0
0
Mortai Gravesend said:
Sharp Blue said:
I fought my bully, straight up fistfight, we drew. Later on he comlemented me on my guts and vouched for me, we became friends, he was messed up and needed to take it out on somebody, I sorta didn't let him.

I realize it was self defence and respect the court ruling, but I seriously dislike that the kid used a knife, it seems unfair like it could have been planned, probibly wasn't though...
UNFAIR? Someone attacks and it's supposed to be 'fair'? The point of defending yourself isn't to be 'fair', it's to get the other person to stop. You don't want them to have a chance.
Point taken, still irks me though.
 

baconfist

New member
Sep 8, 2009
70
0
0
senordesol said:
Shycte said:
Chill the fuck out. Go outside and take a sip of air, there isn't any reason to start getting worked up about it so take it easy okay? First of all, you don't know a fuck about me and please don't think you do. Okay? Stop jumping to conclusions about me, because this is the internet, and the thing about the internet is that you don't know shit about anyone.

Thing is, I'm not going to judge if it was self-defence or not, I don't think it's logical to stab someone 11 times because I'm pretty sure that the 15-year old kid who died wasn't exactly making much recistance after the tenth time. A judge in Florida said that according to U.S law it was self-defence so I guess we have to buy that. What I think should count as a reasonable amount of violence is another thing, don't mix those two up.

Here is the thing I'm annoyed by, people that said that the 15 year old kid deserved to die or that he had it coming. I'm not saying that you've said, but several people have. Somewhere in this world a mother is crying because her son were stabbed to death, I want people to remember that side of this coin.
I am one of those people who says he had it coming and I have a pretty specific reason why. If you go out of your way to terrorize a boy, particularly when he is trying to avoid you, and then assault him; you are demonstrating a very particular malice of forethought and willful disregard for your victim's soundness and safety. If this had been a bobcat he had backed into a corner, no one would have been the least bit shocked if he got mauled.

He not only sought a confrontation, he FORCED a confrontation, and if things had gone just a tad differently it could have very well been the victim's mother shedding tears for her dead or critically injured boy. There was no reason to attack the kid. NONE. There was no reason to chase him off the bus. There was no reason to punch him in the back of the head. Had he decided against any of that, he'd still be alive today. He made a series of senseless, violent, evil choices and wound up bearing the ultimate consequence of those choices.

If only the universe were so just in every case.
Best post in 24 pages. Well said sir.
 

Bobinator

New member
May 7, 2008
1
0
0
Meh...asshole got what he deserved, this should hopefully teach people dont bully the wrong person or you're gonna get a few stabs to the chest.
 

Daddy Go Bot

New member
Aug 14, 2008
233
0
0
11 times, 5 times, 2 times, I DON'T GIVE A FUCK AND IT SHOULD NOT MATTER. This is premeditated murder and the kid who did it should get life - END OF.

*sigh* whatever. I never really expect much from the sheltered nerds who frequent this place anyways.