Sci-Fi Channel Hits Head, Wakes Up As "Syfy" - UPDATED

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
Sci-Fi Channel Hits Head, Wakes Up As "Syfy" - UPDATED


The Sci-Fi Channel [http://www.scifi.com/] announced today that effective this summer it will change its name to the hip, edgy and phonetically identical Syfy.

The new name reflects Syfy's broad range of "imagination-based entertainment beyond just the traditional sci-fi genre, including fantasy, supernatural, paranormal, reality, mystery, action and adventure," the network said in a press release presumably written by the same gang of idiots who decided Syfy wouldn't immediately conjure up images of STDs. "It also positions the brand for future growth by creating an ownable trademark that can travel easily with consumers across new media and nonlinear digital platforms, new international channels and extend into new business ventures."

"Without abandoning our legacy or our core audience, we needed to cultivate a distinct point of view with a name that we could own that invites more people in and recognizes our broader range of programming with literally something for everyone," said Sci-Fi President Dave Howe, who is apparently not ashamed of himself despite the urging of Sci-Fi website readers. "Syfy allows us to build on our 16-year heritage of success with a new brand built on the power that fuels our genre: the imagination. Syfy ushers in a new era of unlimited imagination, exceptional experiences and greater entertainment that paves the way for us to truly become a global lifestyle brand."

The new name will also help facilitate the channel's expansion into other ventures, the company said, like Syfy Games, Syfy Films and Syfy Kids. Syfy will also "meet the needs of a globally relevant, trademarkable brand that stands for something unique in each territory." Along with the name change will come a new brand message, "Imagine Greater," which I imagine won't greatly distract people from wondering what the hell possessed the people at Sci-Fi to come up with this truly awful name.

Reaction to the name change on the Sci-Fi website Warren Ellis' blog [http://scifiwire.com/2009/03/sci-fi-channel-to-become.php#comments] have pointed out that "syfy" has a meaning "somewhere between zits, filthy and scum," which most non-Polish speaking observers feel is a remarkably apt translation regardless of whether or not it's actually true. The new brand will launch in July, backed by an "aggressive marketing campaign" which will almost certainly inspire equally aggressive ridicule and disdain among fans of the channel.

UPDATE:
For what it's worth, the Sci-Fi/Syfy people apparently didn't come up with the name on their own: They paid big piles of money for it instead. It turns out the name was coined by Michael Hinman, who created the name for his science fiction news site when he created it back in 1998. He said he suspected the buyer was Sci-Fi owner NBC Universal but wasn't certain until the name popped up in this rebranding.

"The amount was far more substantial than anyone who was simply looking to get into the science-fiction news business would pay, even me. So we knew it was someone extremely well capitalized," Hinman said. The whole story is available at the former SyFy site, now called Airlock Alpha [http://www.airlockalpha.com/news426169.html].


Permalink
 

Brotherofwill

New member
Jan 25, 2009
2,566
0
0
It's quite a strange attempt to have these hip names that are kind of oddly spelled like Wii, Zune or Boku. I always thought that the Sci-Fi brand was slightly iconic and pretty much liked throughout the nerd kingdom. This is absolutely stupid, it's like turning away from Sci-Fi fans and saying "Fuck you and thanks for all the fish".

Not that I care, because I don't watch TV.
 

thiosk

New member
Sep 18, 2008
5,410
0
0
OH GOD WHY

of course, i havn't been watching much for years... their movies are horrible, the shows tend to be horrible, save a bit of battlestar and dr who.

I hate ghosthunters or whatever that garbage that passes for television is.
 

fix-the-spade

New member
Feb 25, 2008
8,639
0
0
Somewhere is a marketing exec (or execs), some graphic designers and an illustrator/designer all walking away with five/six figure cheques for this.
It's nice to know the smart can still con the stupid out of large sums of money.
 

Galletea

Inexplicably Awesome
Sep 27, 2008
2,877
0
0
I laughed. It's a stupid attempt to appeal to a wider audience, but it might actually work. I'm not sure which part of that is worse.
 

Neesa

New member
Jan 29, 2009
510
0
0
Oh man, let's seem all cool and hip and get all the cool kids to watch our nerdy shows!

Yeah. That's not gonna happen. Younger generations rather watch snooty kids spend their parents' money and have high school dramas out of this world. They don't care if Icdotoda wants to fly to the planet Zeekborg to defend his home planet of Teeckadorz. Honestly, now.
 

the_tramp

New member
May 16, 2008
878
0
0
Oh
Dear
God
Why!

This is just... words cannot begin to describe it... just... no... the SciFi channel will ALWAYS be the Sci-Fi channel. Complete with their crappy 'made for Sci-Fi films' and their even worse softcore porn films that they show. They cannot lose this image by calling themselves Syfy to 'ge' down wid da kidz'.
 

level250geek

New member
Jan 8, 2009
184
0
0
You know the biggest difference between Sci-Fi and SyFy? You can trademark SyFy. I'm honestly surprised it took this long.
 

sms_117b

Keeper of Brannigan's Law
Oct 4, 2007
2,880
0
0
but, sci-fi was acceptable, why do this, your shows don't cater to the younger generation.......besides no-one cares what a channel is called
 

thiosk

New member
Sep 18, 2008
5,410
0
0
all the chans are changing their names.

Remember courtTV? Now we have TruTV, which is rapidly gearing up to be an all reality all the time network.
 

meatloaf231

Old Man Glenn
Feb 13, 2008
2,248
0
0
Ugh. I thought they paid all their people to come up with terrible ideas for movies, not terrible ideas in general.
 

scotth266

Wait when did I get a sub
Jan 10, 2009
5,202
0
0
tijuanatim said:
pyromcr said:
but it is still the same dumb channel with the same bad shows...
Don't forget the laughably terrible, 'SciFi Original movies'.
Hold the phone! Not all SciFi shows are bad. (Note: Doctor Who, Star Trek, and Stargate SG-1.) If you're not a fan of the stuff they show, then too bad for you, but there's no need to flame them. Admittedly though, those Original Movies are crap.

I honestly couldn't care less about this: it just means that people will get confused for awhile and think they got the wrong channel. They should've stuck with the name they had already, and made a better marketing campaign.
 

Sewblon

New member
Nov 5, 2008
3,107
0
0
And TV dies forever, or until I can muster the effort to abduct Jhonen Vasquez and force him to make another show.