Would be awesome if I HAD any iTunes stores or anything like that. If someone doesn't have them in town (or country...), PSP loses, apparently, one of the greatest advantages over other consoles.Danzorz said:"
You can walk into the iTunes app store right now with $5.00 in your account and walk out with hundreds of free apps, Peggle and a handful of other pay games. With the PSP Go, $5.00 gets you a quarter of the way to one of the less expensive games, like Patapon 2. The flaw, my friends, is not with the system price, it's with the lack of an average price drop on the actual content.
"
This.GuNsLiNgEr X said:The PSP has always been utter shit, and the PSP Go is no different.
The PSP is a fine device if you own a PS3 and actually use both in conjunction. Remote play is easily the best feature I've ever seen in a console/handheld.GuNsLiNgEr X said:The PSP has always been utter shit, and the PSP Go is no different.
I recently got a PSP due to the fact that I can download all future releases on the PSN. Part of a handheld is portability. UMD's make it less portable. So, this move interested me and got me to buy one.h0m1cyde said:Anyone that has held out this long on a PSP doesn't want one and probably never will.
Hopefully they learned from their console shenanigans, that backwards compatibility is an important concept for a lot of consumers, and put it in.Onmi said:I agree, if you give people something give them an incentive to buy it, let them download 3 free games and make some Indie games cost like a dollar that are REALLY fun.
As for the original PSP being bad? no. Just no. It is neither a sales failure (50 million) or a library failure (Over 60 games that I want but thats just me) and it's a home brew WONDER.
MY problem with the Go is, does it still support backwards compatability. Why buy a Go if I can't play my Super Robot Wars games on it?
Oh shut up.GuNsLiNgEr X said:The PSP has always been utter shit, and the PSP Go is no different.
Nintendo and Sony have switched places in this current console generation. Nintendo thought that the popularity of the N64 would continue on with the GC, but the PS2 was better in pretty much every way except when it came to not breaking when you dropped it. Nintendo realised that they had been lazy and got to work. Sony needs to realise this, but it seems like they haven't, at least not yet.BobisOnlyBob said:Even the PS2 was a bit of a design nightmare to start with. Blocky, bizarre power button/switch placement, notoriously fragile, and a headache to program for... but it had a significant head-start over the Xbox, and the Gamecube was off in la-la land as far as design and marketing were concerned. They were in the right place at the right time; and now they think they can continue to make the same shoddy design decisions and get away with it. They think their luck and timing is a result of their decisions - the PS2 was well-timed and well-marketed. Those factors are no longer in their favour. The result is stupidity like the PSP Go.
Jesus Christ you can type fast.Onmi said:See and this is what acts as flame bait for Indigo. But just for humours sake let me respond by pointing out that -Seraph- is the PSP Fanboy beyond all belief and that HE is who will be here in any amount of time to flame your monkey asses.Gerazzi said:You do understand that Indigo Dingo will be here flaming your ass, right?
But yes, I agree with you completely.
On a side note: I only keep my PS3 for playing PS2 games now, and that's rather sad.
And if your using your PS3 to only play PS2 games, well it sucks to be you then doesn't it. You must have very high standards for video games if you can't find one game in this current gen worth playing released this year. Or maybe you haven't been searching, or maybe you have been searching and found some that you thought you might like but.
And if I understand this correctly you can NOT return video games in america.
Didn't want to waste the money on it. For whatever reason it may be you are correct in that it is sad, as not only does it reflect on you the gamer, but the statement was so short how could we tell. The PS2 is still a console kicking ass in the market with new games, so are you playing new games for it or old classics? maybe your waiting for some new PS3 release games, maybe your waiting for some multi-console games, maybe your waiting until you can pirate games for the PS3 I simply do not know! So please expand on this point so that we may actually get a view into the psyche of Gerazzi.
Actually polls show that BC is one of the least requested features (I Expect though that voice chat would take precedent) although I personally wonder why they don't just make a PS2 emulator, put it on PSN for $50 or so, and sell it there, they must have emulation software from the original run so it shouldn't cost anything, hell if you NEED to get the guys who did PCSX2 and mod the code, you don't even have to pay them because you can SUE there asses if they don't like it.super_smash_jesus said:Hopefully they learned from their console shenanigans, that backwards compatibility is an important concept for a lot of consumers, and put it in.
As for the article, I completely agree about the pricing being the thing that is going to stop most people. I don't really like sony games, but this thing looks like it would be fun, but not fun enough for 250 bones, plus up to 40 more for games.
But anyway as I said my problem is the current PSP models? I can get games from america and japan that don't come out in Australia. I don't wanna buy them and be unable to play them on the Go for whatever reason. This includes future releases like Disgaea 2 on PSP.
On that note they ARE doing a 'Trade in your UMDs for the digital version" or something like that for people who want to upgrade but does that cover titles brought from overseas? *shrugs*