T.V.R's, what century are you inRA92 said:The thing is though, car people can be even more ridiculous than gamers. Audis and BMWs are well engineered and mostly understated machines, but people like Clarkson will shit on them for their tosser image. And then heap love upon another car with no ABS or power steering or traction control for being pure and having passion behind them (Noble M600, Caterhams and every single TVRs for instance).
And even if it's optional, the fact that other people have that option will detract from our driving!sageoftruth said:Tell me about it. I've heard they're even thinking of making cars that can drive themselves. That completely ruins the point of even having a car.
Isn't that a limitation of the reviewer and just the process of the reviews in general? Not meant as a slight against any reviewer, but if the games are hard, the might not be able to complete them in the time they were given. They have a schedule, right? It's not really anyone's fault, just a problem of the process.The Wooster said:I really wish game reviewers would talk about difficulty in more depth. When games like Dark Souls and Super Meat Boy both fall under the general umbrella of "hard," you're limiting what information you can give the reader.
Actually, time will tell on that one, just how "optional" it's going to be or what caveats will be attached to either of the options. You know, once lawmakers get their mitts on innovations...Zachary Amaranth said:And even if it's optional, the fact that other people have that option will detract from our driving!sageoftruth said:Tell me about it. I've heard they're even thinking of making cars that can drive themselves. That completely ruins the point of even having a car.
Well, it was an "even if" and mostly there to parallel how optional lower difficulties totally detract from the hardcore pros.Vegosiux said:Actually, time will tell on that one, just how "optional" it's going to be or what caveats will be attached to either of the options. You know, once lawmakers get their mitts on innovations...
Still a decade in the future or so, I'd say, but I do think there'll be a certain...pressure.
Yeah, I actually didn't get that parallel until after I've posted >.> Mental lag.Zachary Amaranth said:Well, it was an "even if" and mostly there to parallel how optional lower difficulties totally detract from the hardcore pros.
I believe it was along the lines of:Teoes said:I wonder if that's the first thing the Hamster said to Clarkson, when he woke up.
To be completely sexist (which goes against my nature but hey, we all gotta take a day off sometime), it's a bit like dating a hot chick who is also completely insane. Versus the 'just pretty' chick who is not insane. BMW and Audi are the chicks you eventually marry, when you finally realize the crazy will never go away. And you're tired of nearly dying.RA92 said:The thing is though, car people can be even more ridiculous than gamers. Audis and BMWs are well engineered and mostly understated machines, but people like Clarkson will shit on them for their tosser image. And then heap love upon another car with no ABS or power steering or traction control for being pure and having passion behind them (Noble M600, Caterhams and every single TVRs for instance).
I used to review books for an online website (actually, several). And the rule was, if you really, deeply hated it, you would pass it on to someone else who could review it without frothing hatred. There was always 1-2 people who never gave anything less than a 3-star rating. So it doesn't surprise me that a similar attitude exists in the game reviewing world, albeit a little different.UltraPic said:T.V.R's, what century are you inRA92 said:The thing is though, car people can be even more ridiculous than gamers. Audis and BMWs are well engineered and mostly understated machines, but people like Clarkson will shit on them for their tosser image. And then heap love upon another car with no ABS or power steering or traction control for being pure and having passion behind them (Noble M600, Caterhams and every single TVRs for instance).. But when it come's to the image issue, when "noob's" start buying a fast car en mass, prices go up for insurance and prices go down fast in deprecation and trust that the car is in good order when sold on. So it's not as ridiculous as you think.
Not only crashed, but somehow caused it to catch fire and explode.TopazFusion said:So, you're not allowed to review a game until you've crashed the game?
That would be Dark Souls pvp. That build is the equivalent of the noob tube in FPS's, hence the very tongue in cheek tone of the video.marcooos said:... What the fuck did I just watch?Mistilteinn said:This was the first thing I thought of when I saw this:
"Its time to fuckign pwn sum n00bz"
Yea.. a negative review of what appears to be an expensive car. The game analogy somewhat fails right there.Chaosritter said:Eh, this comic doesn't really work, should be like this:
Reviewer: This car is fucking awesome, 9/10
Consumer: Oh boy, sounds great! I'm gonna buy it on release day
*car crashes and burns*
Reviewer: It would have been unfair to give it a lower score for critical technical flaws and constant crashes, those are probably gonna get fixed some day anyway
Just take Battlefield 4 for example...
Alternatively it could have gone like this:Chaosritter said:Eh, this comic doesn't really work, should be like this:
Reviewer: This car is fucking awesome, 9/10
Consumer: Oh boy, sounds great! I'm gonna buy it on release day
*car crashes and burns*
Reviewer: It would have been unfair to give it a lower score for critical technical flaws and constant crashes, those are probably gonna get fixed some day anyway
Just take Battlefield 4 for example...