2 Pro 4 U

Recommended Videos

BX3

New member
Mar 7, 2011
659
0
0
"The breaks are about as effective as the withdrawal method."

It works 80% of the time when executed properly? But I have no idea what that means when it comes to cars!!!
 

Ambitiousmould

Why does it say I'm premium now?
Apr 22, 2012
447
0
0
I don't suppose that it's a coincidence that this came out just after the new series of TG started? One episode in and there's already been 2 explosions, several demolished walls, a tank, and several mustaches.

OT: Only earlier today I read something in which some halfwit decided that the reviewer had to like the game to review it, because there would be a negative bias if they didn't like the game they were reviewing. I feel that this is somehow relevant.
 

UltraPic

New member
Dec 5, 2011
142
0
0
RA92 said:
The thing is though, car people can be even more ridiculous than gamers. Audis and BMWs are well engineered and mostly understated machines, but people like Clarkson will shit on them for their tosser image. And then heap love upon another car with no ABS or power steering or traction control for being pure and having passion behind them (Noble M600, Caterhams and every single TVRs for instance).
T.V.R's, what century are you in :D. But when it come's to the image issue, when "noob's" start buying a fast car en mass, prices go up for insurance and prices go down fast in deprecation and trust that the car is in good order when sold on. So it's not as ridiculous as you think.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,756
0
0
sageoftruth said:
Tell me about it. I've heard they're even thinking of making cars that can drive themselves. That completely ruins the point of even having a car.
And even if it's optional, the fact that other people have that option will detract from our driving!
 

Ishal

New member
Oct 30, 2012
1,176
0
0
The Wooster said:
I really wish game reviewers would talk about difficulty in more depth. When games like Dark Souls and Super Meat Boy both fall under the general umbrella of "hard," you're limiting what information you can give the reader.
Isn't that a limitation of the reviewer and just the process of the reviews in general? Not meant as a slight against any reviewer, but if the games are hard, the might not be able to complete them in the time they were given. They have a schedule, right? It's not really anyone's fault, just a problem of the process.
 

Vegosiux

New member
May 18, 2011
4,378
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
sageoftruth said:
Tell me about it. I've heard they're even thinking of making cars that can drive themselves. That completely ruins the point of even having a car.
And even if it's optional, the fact that other people have that option will detract from our driving!
Actually, time will tell on that one, just how "optional" it's going to be or what caveats will be attached to either of the options. You know, once lawmakers get their mitts on innovations...

Still a decade in the future or so, I'd say, but I do think there'll be a certain...pressure.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,756
0
0
Vegosiux said:
Actually, time will tell on that one, just how "optional" it's going to be or what caveats will be attached to either of the options. You know, once lawmakers get their mitts on innovations...

Still a decade in the future or so, I'd say, but I do think there'll be a certain...pressure.
Well, it was an "even if" and mostly there to parallel how optional lower difficulties totally detract from the hardcore pros.
 

Vegosiux

New member
May 18, 2011
4,378
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
Well, it was an "even if" and mostly there to parallel how optional lower difficulties totally detract from the hardcore pros.
Yeah, I actually didn't get that parallel until after I've posted >.> Mental lag.
 

SpAc3man

New member
Jul 26, 2009
1,195
0
0
Teoes said:
I wonder if that's the first thing the Hamster said to Clarkson, when he woke up.
I believe it was along the lines of:
Clarkson: "You were in an accident."
Hamster: "Was I being stupid?"
 

talker

New member
Nov 18, 2011
313
0
0
Clarkson and Hammond on the escapist? *sniff* This is a dream come true!
 
Aug 31, 2011
120
0
0
RA92 said:
The thing is though, car people can be even more ridiculous than gamers. Audis and BMWs are well engineered and mostly understated machines, but people like Clarkson will shit on them for their tosser image. And then heap love upon another car with no ABS or power steering or traction control for being pure and having passion behind them (Noble M600, Caterhams and every single TVRs for instance).
To be completely sexist (which goes against my nature but hey, we all gotta take a day off sometime), it's a bit like dating a hot chick who is also completely insane. Versus the 'just pretty' chick who is not insane. BMW and Audi are the chicks you eventually marry, when you finally realize the crazy will never go away. And you're tired of nearly dying.

As woman, I intend to marry the male equivalent of a Toyota truck. Given my propensity for assault, this is my only option.
 
Aug 31, 2011
120
0
0
UltraPic said:
RA92 said:
The thing is though, car people can be even more ridiculous than gamers. Audis and BMWs are well engineered and mostly understated machines, but people like Clarkson will shit on them for their tosser image. And then heap love upon another car with no ABS or power steering or traction control for being pure and having passion behind them (Noble M600, Caterhams and every single TVRs for instance).
T.V.R's, what century are you in :D. But when it come's to the image issue, when "noob's" start buying a fast car en mass, prices go up for insurance and prices go down fast in deprecation and trust that the car is in good order when sold on. So it's not as ridiculous as you think.
I used to review books for an online website (actually, several). And the rule was, if you really, deeply hated it, you would pass it on to someone else who could review it without frothing hatred. There was always 1-2 people who never gave anything less than a 3-star rating. So it doesn't surprise me that a similar attitude exists in the game reviewing world, albeit a little different.

Speaking of books, when did 'newb' become 'nub'? Cuz in my world, 'nub' is something from old school romance novels referring to nipples...or other things. Ahem. Euphemisms are fun.
 

EeveeElectro

Cats.
Aug 3, 2008
7,052
0
0
No no no. Clarkson needs to be swearing more and insulting gays or women.

OT: sadly true. If you're ever short on ideas you can just adapt this to other parts of life. (Making a cake, doing food shopping, walking the dog etc)
 

Aeonknight

New member
Apr 8, 2011
751
0
0
marcooos said:
Mistilteinn said:
This was the first thing I thought of when I saw this:


"Its time to fuckign pwn sum n00bz"
... What the fuck did I just watch?
That would be Dark Souls pvp. That build is the equivalent of the noob tube in FPS's, hence the very tongue in cheek tone of the video.
 

Kargathia

New member
Jul 16, 2009
1,657
0
0
Chaosritter said:
Eh, this comic doesn't really work, should be like this:

Reviewer: This car is fucking awesome, 9/10

Consumer: Oh boy, sounds great! I'm gonna buy it on release day

*car crashes and burns*

Reviewer: It would have been unfair to give it a lower score for critical technical flaws and constant crashes, those are probably gonna get fixed some day anyway

Just take Battlefield 4 for example...
Yea.. a negative review of what appears to be an expensive car. The game analogy somewhat fails right there.
 

NuclearKangaroo

New member
Feb 7, 2014
1,919
0
0
reminds me of all those reviews of sonic lost world, and the insane backlash from the sonic fanbase

that wasnt just butthurt, it was a complete rectal holocaust... until everyone played it and they realized it was a crap game
 

gamegod25

New member
Jul 10, 2008
863
0
0
Chaosritter said:
Eh, this comic doesn't really work, should be like this:

Reviewer: This car is fucking awesome, 9/10

Consumer: Oh boy, sounds great! I'm gonna buy it on release day

*car crashes and burns*

Reviewer: It would have been unfair to give it a lower score for critical technical flaws and constant crashes, those are probably gonna get fixed some day anyway

Just take Battlefield 4 for example...
Alternatively it could have gone like this:

Reviewer: This game is bland and buggy!

Publisher: Ahem.... *slips them a check*

Reviewer: Er I mean....game of the year!