If only humans could perceive the difference...oh, wait.Piorn said:Well, technically, 30fps is closer to the cinema's 24fps, so you could call it "cinematic".
It's just nothing to be proud of, and certainly nothing to advertize.
Woah, someone's trying to give the Flash a run for his money. To really enjoy the full experience it's recommended you take at least five minutes per panel.88chaz88 said:I'd have commented sooner, but to get the most out of this comic I spent at least a minute on each panel. Feels more cinematic that way.
Could be worse, it could be "animetic" (it's a word, shut up!)MarsAtlas said:That reminds me, I saw a commercial on TV for the new Call of Duty which had at least two mentions calling it "cinematic". I guess now that means its a hand-holding bore where you can't do anything and it has a shite framerate.
That's just perfect with your avatar. Oh boy, what's worse than a game at a shit resolution and poor frame rate? Make it about girls, by a girl! Run to the hills!Paulhorne Schillings said:*instantly wants to play any game, Zoetrope edition*
$5, for someone that can create a video game completely in Zoetrope.
Then why don't they make their videogames to run at 24 fps?Piorn said:Well, technically, 30fps is closer to the cinema's 24fps, so you could call it "cinematic".
It's just nothing to be proud of, and certainly nothing to advertize.
Obviously because as long as they're not at 24 FPS yet, they can continue to make nebulous claims about their games becoming "more cinematic".CaitSeith said:Then why don't they make their videogames to run at 24 fps?Piorn said:Well, technically, 30fps is closer to the cinema's 24fps, so you could call it "cinematic".
It's just nothing to be proud of, and certainly nothing to advertize.