No there isn't. And you got it wrong.Iznat said:BEMDAS
2(9+3)
= 2(12)
= 24
therefore 48/24
= 2
There is no argument to this >_<
No D: The priority is BEMDASWuggy said:No there isn't. And you got it wrong.Iznat said:BEMDAS
2(9+3)
= 2(12)
= 24
therefore 48/24
= 2
There is no argument to this >_<
You can think the expression like so:
(48÷2)*(9+3)
It may be easier to comprehend. The priority is left to right, see.
PurpleMath.com said:This next example displays an issue that almost never arises but, when it does, there seems to be no end to the arguing.
Simplify 16 ÷ 2[8 ? 3(4 ? 2)] + 1.
16 ÷ 2[8 ? 3(4 ? 2)] + 1
= 16 ÷ 2[8 ? 3(2)] + 1
= 16 ÷ 2[8 ? 6] + 1
= 16 ÷ 2[2] + 1 (**)
= 16 ÷ 4 + 1
= 4 + 1
= 5
The confusing part in the above calculation is how "16 divided by 2[2] + 1" (in the line marked with the double-star) becomes "16 divided by 4 + 1", instead of "8 times by 2 + 1". That's because, even though multiplication and division are at the same level (so the left-to-right rule should apply), parentheses outrank division, so the first 2 goes with the [2], rather than with the "16 divided by". That is, multiplication that is indicated by placement against parentheses (or brackets, etc) is "stronger" than "regular" multiplication. Typesetting the entire problem in a graphing calculator verifies this hierarchy:
[Calculator image removed; please see source for image]
Note that different software will process this differently; even different models of Texas Instruments graphing calculators will process this differently. In cases of ambiguity, be very careful of your parentheses, and make your meaning clear. The general consensus among math people is that "multiplication by juxtaposition" (that is, multiplying by just putting things next to each other, rather than using the "×" sign) indicates that the juxtaposed values must be multiplied together before processing other operations. But not all software is programmed this way, and sometimes teachers view things differently. If in doubt, ask!
(And please do not send me an e-mail either asking for or else proffering a definitive verdict on this issue. As far as I know, there is no such final verdict. And telling me to do this your way will not solve the issue!)
Source [http://www.purplemath.com/modules/orderops2.htm]
It's BEDMAS or BODMASxzenopredator said:This entirely.I dont get where all these supposed "difficult" maths equations are coming from.First 4chan,then facebook,now here.Do people not know the rules of mathsIznat said:BEMDAS
2(9+3)
= 2(12)
= 24
therefore 48/24
= 2
There is no argument to this >_<![]()
Brackets.Exponentiols.Multiplication.Devision.Addition.Subtraction. <-- for anyone who doesnt know BEMDAS
I'm fine with people being stupid.kebab4you said:48÷2(9+3)
48÷2(12)
48/2=24
24*12=288
would need to be: 48÷(2(9+3)) for it to be 2.
This. +1Spencer Petersen said:288
1.Terms inside parentheses or brackets
2.Exponents and roots
3.Multiplication and division as they appear left to right
4.Addition and subtraction as they appear left to right
That is the order
/thread
No. Multiplication and division change priority from left to right. If division is left of multiplication, you divide first.Iznat said:No D: The priority is BEMDASWuggy said:No there isn't. And you got it wrong.Iznat said:BEMDAS
2(9+3)
= 2(12)
= 24
therefore 48/24
= 2
There is no argument to this >_<
You can think the expression like so:
(48÷2)*(9+3)
It may be easier to comprehend. The priority is left to right, see.
Brackets
Exponentials
Multiplication
Division
Addition
Subtraction
Ergo:
2(9+3)
2(12)
24
leading to
48/24
Goddamnit, you guys are wrong!![]()
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/jump/18.282481.11082861dday4you said:is it 2 or 288?