And the crappy movie about it staring Leonardo DiCaprio already came out.Daystar Clarion said:
I won't. I still haven't heard and official apology from Randy Pitchford or anyone at SEGA for screwing me and a lot of other people out of their money for this garbage. I still haven't heard any attempt at trying to make it up to us via a refund or some sort of free content. I don't really care that they're trying to make this terrible game slightly less terrible after the fact, they still screwed a lot of people over and we're owed an apology.V da Mighty Taco said:
Hard to say. It's still listed as intended for the Wii U. I'm sure Nintendo was fighting to get it released on their system prior to the official release. They really want to improve their 3rd party support. Sega probably wanted to release it on the Wii U at the same time as the other releases. However, Nintendo has notoriously strict guidelines. Those guidelines have been the main obstruction for 3rd parties and Indies. Basically, Nintendo demands quality at release, and that's probably why it wasn't allowed to release at the same time as the others. At this point I doubt the game will ever get approved for release. It shows that Nintendo is right to be strict about quality, but they are still a bit of a pain to work with. Hopefully they can find a happy medium. I'd imagine Nintendo would have even rejected Skyrim if they were offered a version that played like the PS3 version. The problem with that is that if the developer says the reason the game isn't released is because Nintendo is holding it up people get mad at Nintendo. In hindsight I'm sure many PS3 owners would have rather Skyrim have missed its release date and been fixed first rather than deal with an unplayable version, but that's the catch. If it's not released you never really know, and you blame the process that protected you from the bad game. In this case everyone knows Aliens is a bad game so no one will hold it against Nintendo for rejecting the game.jecht35 said:
Short answer yes, long answer involves a lot of missing limbs in a mission previously walked through without even trying. I heard comparisons with the old AVP in how their now actually dangerous and scary, oh and the acid blood, oh god I lost count how often I died from that after surviving a xeno attack. The graphics improvements confirm what I thought, they just turned the lights down and adjusted a few small details, it was never a big change from the demo.Bolt-206 said:
Because they were not done, because it was not ready, because it did not exist back then...Zombie_Moogle said:
You could not be more wrong. Aliens vs Predator (1999) and Aliens Versus Predator 2 (2001) for the PC were amazing gamesYellowbeard said:
I've played both many times, and I've yet to wrap my head around how awful it is to fight aliens in AvP2, as an alien OR a marine. Only the alien campaigns are consistently fun. Marine is good in '99. At best half of Predator is worth playing in either.Steven Bogos said:
