Good for you Sledgehammer, you made an engine you've been using since 2007 run at 60fps. What I actually care about is the gameplay, given my eyes are barely even capable of detecting the difference between 30 and 60fps.
Just because the FPS is higher, that does not mean MW3 will be better than BF3, I'm looking forward to BF3 because of the new engine (which makes me drool) with destructible environments and physics, wheras MW3 will still be running the same engine with little to improve the gameplay beyond a few new perks and tweaks, but I've always preferred the multiplayer of BF3, because of its large scale battles and vehicles, along with actual innovation.
I mean seriously, make some game changing decisions and some innovation this time round and I'd be more than happy to play the damn thing, but as it stands, I already have Black Ops, which was pretty much a reskin of MW2 and see no reason to buy MW3 at all. These are games remember, where they key element is GAMEPLAY, not FPS, which no one here even cares about, you should be pushing the gameplay elements of MW3, not some poxy fps increase.
LightOfDarkness said:
Zhukov said:
Can the untrained human eye even tell the difference between 30fps and 60fps?
Yes.
It's like the difference between a generic TV and an HDTV I think.
Not really, TV and HDTV are a noticeable increase because the picture is sharper and displayed better, in comparison a generic TV picture is blurry. I know I can't really tell the difference between 30 fps and 60, because I've been playing games with a variation between the two for years. Not that I'm having a go at you, I'm just saying

Plus I have extremely good eyesight, so it's not like its just MY eyes that can't really tell the difference in FPS