nah mate im pretty sure rappers doJWAN said:Ok
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uqD8Ja6IZ0
guns dont hurt people people hurt people
nah mate im pretty sure rappers doJWAN said:Ok
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uqD8Ja6IZ0
guns dont hurt people people hurt people
Humanity doesn't need to be perfect to leave violence behind quite the opposite in fact, if we swear off changing our nature until we have solved all the worlds problems then we will never change. Solving problems with violence creates more problems: war begets fear which leads to anger, mistrust and animosity which leads to more wars. Crime stems from greed or hopelessness fueled by desperation which leads to violence and more crime.rcuhljr said:Where did I say no reason? I just said you need to figure out how to get rid of all the reasons first. You need to solve jealousy, perfect relationships, perfectly medicate all mental illnesses, remove all intoxicants, perfect family lives, and a laundry list of other tasks. Get those done and then come talk to me about gun ownership and I'll gladly discuss it. Violence isn't rooted in just fear and desperation, it's rooted in anger, aggression, and human nature.
If only he'd shot the parents and the trainer aswell.cake42 said:natural selection at it's finest
It's not THAT good, it's still an innocent child's life. He was 8, he was curious as to what was wrong. He doesn't have the logic that we do.Usurpurus said:Frankly, this is good. The kid did the world a favour an removed himself from the gene pool. Seriously, who is retarded enough to point a gun at themself without wanting to kill themselves.
When did I say you shouldn't change your nature? Go ahead and change your nature. That doesn't involve removing items capable of causing harm. So when our hypothetical women shoots her hypothetical killer, what new crime is her violence causing? Can you tell me how spousal abuse is fueled by greed or desperation?Heathrow said:If we swear off changing our nature until we have solved all the worlds problems then we will never change. Solving problems with violence creates more problems: war begets fear which leads to anger, mistrust and animosity which leads to more wars. Crime stems from greed or hopelessness fueled by desperation which leads to violence and more crime.
Uhm...let's read the headline together shall we?rcuhljr said:Except it wasn't at a gun show, it's like you purposefully work at being ignorant while trying to condemn others.yzzlthtz said:Ahh, American gun shows. Where neo cons can rub elbows with neo nazis and show off their suitcase sniper rifles.
This story does not surprise me in the least.
Someone please invade us to give these people something to do with themselves.
I wasn't talking about his posts, I was worried about the evolution comment.paasi said:Not really. Check his posts. With a bit of education you'll find that he dodges the real issues and plays on some obscure possibilities and illogical arguments.... much like evolutionists. I hate that bunch.
About the Europe thing: I also noticed the abundance of "silly America" threads and this one is by no means intended as such. I live in Belgium and I was referring to Central Europe where there are no such laws. And still, people don't carry guns and our street aren't run by gangsters or by the maffia. I think that people fear guns more than that they see a means to protect themselves, and definitely not as something with a high entertainment value. And this is all of course my own opinion.Treblaine said:All firearms are dangerous, from a fully automatic uzi to your grandpa's shotgun.Woem said:The title in itself contains a couple of words that shouldn't be used near eachother. The story behind it is even worse. Read it for yourself: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/10/christopher-biziljs-famil_n_351732.html
My European brain has issues understanding this. So first of all we have a family that thinks it's a good to take an 8 year old kid to a gun show. Then we have 15 year old instructor who is demonstrating an Uzi. This teen clears the Uzi and gives it to the 8 year old to try it out. Apparently up until this part there is no problem at all. I do see a problem with a teen being a gun instructor, or a kid going to a gun show, or a teen giving a gun to a kid to try it out. But again, that must be my European close-mindedness.
Now here is the real issue: the gun jams, and the kid shoots himself in the head. Quote from the article:So the big issue in this whole story is that the gun jammed and as a result of that, the kid shot himself. It's no problem that the kid is at a gun show in the first place, or that a teen is handing out guns to kids, or that the kid is trying out guns. That's all just fine. But because it wasn't cleared properly the Uzi was deemed unreasonably dangerous. So when an Uzi is cleared properly it is reasonably dangerous for a kid to try out? If the kid hadn't shot himself it would have been a successful family trip. This really blows my mind. No pun intended.The boy's family claims the gun was defective and unreasonably dangerous, and they blame the failure to properly service it.
If they malfunction and are not used with care by adults then tragic accidents like this will happen again.
Also what's this "my European mind" acting so naive about guns. Have you any idea the extent of Gun ownership in places like Finland and Switzerland? Not just of revolvers put fully automatic submachine guns and .50 calibre sniper rifles.
Why does everyone act like America is the only country with extensive civilian gun ownership?
Most violent deaths in the US are not legitimate self-defense. A good number of gun deaths are actually suicide. Guns definitely cause, or fulfill, more problems then they solve, if you look at the numbers.rcuhljr said:When did I say you shouldn't change your nature? Go ahead and change your nature. That doesn't involve removing items capable of causing harm. So when our hypothetical women shoots her hypothetical killer, what new crime is her violence causing? Can you tell me how spousal abuse is fueled by greed or desperation?Heathrow said:If we swear off changing our nature until we have solved all the worlds problems then we will never change. Solving problems with violence creates more problems: war begets fear which leads to anger, mistrust and animosity which leads to more wars. Crime stems from greed or hopelessness fueled by desperation which leads to violence and more crime.
I think uzis are just dangerous period. They shouldn't be available for commercial use.Cheeze_Pavilion said:Wow, lot of posts that I'm not going to read because I assume if anyone had brought this up, the OP would have been edited.Woem said:Now here is the real issue: the gun jams, and the kid shoots himself in the head. Quote from the article:So the big issue in this whole story is that the gun jammed and as a result of that, the kid shot himself. It's no problem that the kid is at a gun show in the first place, or that a teen is handing out guns to kids, or that the kid is trying out guns. That's all just fine. But because it wasn't cleared properly the Uzi was deemed unreasonably dangerous. So when an Uzi is cleared properly it is reasonably dangerous for a kid to try out? If the kid hadn't shot himself it would have been a successful family trip. This really blows my mind. No pun intended.The boy's family claims the gun was defective and unreasonably dangerous, and they blame the failure to properly service it.
No, saying the Uzi was unreasonably dangerous because it wasn't cleared properly has nothing to do with whether "when an Uzi is cleared properly it is reasonably dangerous for a kid to try out"
All they are saying is that Uzi that are not properly cleared are unreasonably dangerous to anyone.
It's like if a family is on a car lot, and a kid gets in a car and drives off, and the car blows up when it gets hit from behind in the gas tank because of faulty manufacturing. It wouldn't have mattered if it was the kid or an adult taking a test drive--the injury *in this case* would have occurred in either situation.
In other words, it shouldn't be a defense (at least in cases like this, where we are talking about a product just put out there into the world) to say 'this person is not authorized to do this' when the reason they were injured had nothing to do with the reason they were not authorized--that's letting someone get away with bad behavior because they got lucky that someone else was behaving badly at the same time.
Do some research, or read the thread you are replying to where people already figured out that the news report was INCORRECT. shoddy reporting, who'd a thunk it. It was not a gun show, it was a machinegun shoot.yzzlthtz said:Uhm...let's read the headline together shall we?rcuhljr said:Except it wasn't at a gun show, it's like you purposefully work at being ignorant while trying to condemn others.yzzlthtz said:Ahh, American gun shows. Where neo cons can rub elbows with neo nazis and show off their suitcase sniper rifles.
This story does not surprise me in the least.
Someone please invade us to give these people something to do with themselves.
"Christopher Bizilj's Family Files Suit: Family Blames Teen For 8-Year-Old's Uzi Death At Gun Show"
And go on please, defend neo nazis. I dare you.