Can't argue with the Medici being one of the most influential families in Europe at that time period. But I doubt they single handedly ended the medieval period. Their contribution was mostly financial. I say most of the credit goes to the people they supported. Still they deserve the credit for at least supporting such people.The Enquirer said:I believe they were but to be fair the Bible is one of the more violent books out there. But to be fair, the family did end hundreds of years of little to no education and very little in the way of culture. So I'd say that they had a huge influence. Even if they did use it for things that ended in death.Knife said:The Medici? Aren't those the fellows who initiated the night of st. Bartholomew? In which thousands of protestants were slaughtered by their catholic brothers?
Not what I would call humanitarians. Though definitely influential.
Yes, there would be a chance the lead lined fridge would have protected him from the initial radiation. However, the moment he opened the door and stepped out he would have been exposed to massive doses from the area around him. Likewise, the heat from the blast, given his proximity, would have likely cooked him inside the fridge. Though, even if it didn't, with how quickly he exited the fridge upon landing he would still have faced ambient temperatures in the hundreds of degrees.Eddie the head said:The heat likely wouldn't have had time to effected him nor would the radiation. You know there where survivors form Hiroshima and Nagasaki, it is completely possible to survive a nuclear blast. Like I said depending of the wight of the fridge it's completely possible. Your fridge? He would likely be dead, but they did flash to a little note on the side that said it was lead lined, so the one used was probably very heavy.
Umm well no that's just not how Thermodynamics work. Most of the heat would have gone into the house an not effected fridge anyway. For radiation just look down for why that's irreverent.Vigormortis said:Yes, there would be a chance the lead lined fridge would have protected him from the initial radiation. However, the moment he opened the door and stepped out he would have been exposed to massive doses from the area around him. Likewise, the heat from the blast, given his proximity, would have likely cooked him inside the fridge. Though, even if it didn't, with how quickly he exited the fridge upon landing he would still have faced ambient temperatures in the hundreds of degrees.
Well 1 is just not true, Akiko Takakura survived the blast in a bank lobby and I think she just died in 2008.And yes, there were some survivors from the blasts over Hiroshima and Nagasaki. But three things to consider:
1: most that did survive died shortly after from severe burns or radiation poisoning
2: the weapons used above Hiroshima and Nagasaki were likely far weaker than the one tested in the film
3: most of the survivors were either in well concealed locations or outside the primary blast radius
It's also said that after the surrender of Japan, the American army doctors explained to him that his body would begin to deteriorate because of the radiation; yet to the doctors' amazement, Fr. Schiffer's body appeared to contain no elevated radiation or ill-effects from the bomb.In fact, he lived for another 33 years in good health, and was present at the Eucharistic Congress held in Philadelphia in 1976. At that time, all eight members of the Jesuit community from Hiroshima were still alive.
That's simple, that wouldn't have happened that way. The fridge would have gone with the shock wave, not be blown ahead. It likely would have tumbled not flew. That part is movie magic, but that would be irreverent to the point that it is possible to survive a nuke in a fridge.All of that is moot, though, when one considers the force required to 'launch' such a heavy fridge. Not to mention the force of the impact from the fridge traveling such a long distance; both horizontally and vertically. The chances of him coming out of it alive, let alone unscathed, are virtually nil. The overpressure alone might even crush the fridge.
The raft stunt, though, is entirely plausible. As long as the weight is distributed in such a manner that it prevents the raft from tumbling end over end, it can provide enough air resistance to act as a pseudo-parachute.
The landing would still hurt like hell, but still may be survivable. Certainly far more than being "nuked in a fridge".
I'm sure this has been addressed already, but I'd still like to give my own take on the OP:Schadrach said:If you were forced to choose some person, place, thing, or event throughout all of human history as "most likely to have been the result of supernatural or divine influence (christian or otherwise)", what would it be?
No, you aren't allowed to choose "nothing, because I don't believe in that shit" as the whole point is to see what people end up picking when forced to actually choose, and that isn't an answer, it's a refusal to answer.
What about things that are true but [a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems"]can't be proven[/a]? What about things that CAN be proven, but [a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banach%E2%80%93Tarski_paradox"]make no goddamn sense[/a]? It's hard to be skeptic in the face of these things, sometimes. Or it is for me, at least.MeisterKleister said:The supernatural is by definition outside of scientific investigation and therefore cannot be proven. Because if it could be proven, that is, if it was in the realm of science, it would automatically become part of nature and not be supernatural anymore.
Your links don't work, though I can see them, when I quote you.Simple Bluff said:What about things that are true but [a href = "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems"]can't be proven[/a]? What about things that CAN be proven, but [a href = "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banach%E2%80%93Tarski_paradox"]make no goddamn sense[/a]? It's hard to be skeptic in the face of these things, sometimes. Or it is for me, at least.MeisterKleister said:The supernatural is by definition outside of scientific investigation and therefore cannot be proven. Because if it could be proven, that is, if it was in the realm of science, it would automatically become part of nature and not be supernatural anymore.
Edit: made some tweaks"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence"
-Carl Sagan