A Letter to the Moderation, and a Defense of Wynn.

RaikuFA

New member
Jun 12, 2009
4,370
0
0
Pyrian said:
shrekfan246 said:
I'm mostly just noting how the moderators here have never been able to win, because even when people have complained that the moderation was too lenient, they were still complaining that it was too harsh and oppressive.
Nailed it. The moderation is too heavy-handed on the people I agree with and too lenient to the people I disagree with. Even if there was some platonic ideal of perfect moderation, it would be criticized on both accounts. Personally, I think the "passive aggressive" accusation is mostly BS. If someone has their argument torn to shreds and resorts to personal attacks in retaliation, it's entirely on them, not on the people who took issue with their position and countered it.
I dunno, I've seen a lot of times where someone can go into a thread starting shit for no reason other than to start shit and not get in trouble while others that do the same thing do get in trouble. There is an issue with favoritism on this site with the mods.

Elvis Starburst said:
(And possibly American Tanker, but I don't fully have that situation memorized).
He threatened the life of someone in a pony thread for posting ponies.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Silentpony said:
...is that it? Seriously? He's an attention troll who got a bunch of attention and...that's it? He didn't Dox anyone, didn't post nudes, didn't spam Bane, didn't drive to your house and ring your doorbell, didn't leave poop on the steps of Escapist HQ?
Just some dude posting random channer shit?
The thing that started the final stretch was a dude posting an entire metal album's lyrics for the lulz. Most of the responses were variations on "IT'S ARRRRRRRT", which tells you all you need to know about it. Mods deemed a couple of the posts about a chick literally raping another one unconscious in public (metal, wtf?) as a bit too over-the-edge towards erotica and locked the thread. The OP was not warned, nothing got deleted, OP had a good larf and moved on.

Epyc flipped every last bit of shit he had.
 

Drathnoxis

Became a mass murderer for your sake
Legacy
Sep 23, 2010
5,468
1,916
118
Just off-screen
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
I think that it would be a good thing if changes were discussed with the community prior to making them. There could be community polls discussion threads. After all the people in charge now are just long time users, I don't really see why they have the right to make decisions any more than most other long time users of the site. Mods have always been far too reticent, we always hear that "things are changing" or that "there are reasons" but the community is never privy to what the proposed changes are or given what the reason are. I don't see why we couldn't have community nominations and votes to elect mods either.

If Defy doesn't want to do anything with the site then it should belong to all of us, not just the people who were semi-arbitrarily picked out of the crowd.

Silentpony said:
...is that it? Seriously? He's an attention troll who got a bunch of attention and...that's it? He didn't Dox anyone, didn't post nudes, didn't spam Bane, didn't drive to your house and ring your doorbell, didn't leave poop on the steps of Escapist HQ?
Just some dude posting random channer shit?
Pretty much, and people HATED him for it. The funny thing is that if they just ignored him he probably would have just left, but people were absolutely incapable of not giving him the attention he craved.
 

Chewster

It's yer man Chewy here!
Apr 24, 2008
1,050
0
0
Nah. I don't know about the all the private group drama because I don't participate in that stuff but I don't recall a single time he ever contributed anything of any value to this site. He was like a first year university student who took a few classes and then decided he knew everything and that was that. Either masterful trolling or else he was just arrogant.

Maybe I'm not that observant but I've been here a long time I've never really seen this much drama over one person. He's probably reading all of this and cackling his black little heart out over it. Literally no need for this thread.

[small]And now I've contributed to the drama. Goddamit...[/small]
 

Bobular

New member
Oct 7, 2009
845
0
0
Silentpony said:
CM156 said:
Silentpony said:
Okay so can anyone actually tell me what Wynn did? From what I can gather he's kinda' a dick who spams memes too much. What's so infamous?
He had strange political views and would sperg out at people when they wouldn't take him seriously. He thinks the internet should be its own country and that in the meantime, private forums need to enforce the First Amendment to the United States constitution (Despite the fact that many speech acts are legal here that are explicitly illegal elsewhere in the world)

Also Wynn got what he wanted: He wanted to go down in a blaze of glory as a martyr. It's just that few others saw it that way.
...is that it? Seriously? He's an attention troll who got a bunch of attention and...that's it? He didn't Dox anyone, didn't post nudes, didn't spam Bane, didn't drive to your house and ring your doorbell, didn't leave poop on the steps of Escapist HQ?
Just some dude posting random channer shit?
He was kicked out of the Wild West for arguing with the mods over what counted as porn and that he should be free to post porn even though it was against the Wild West's few rules.

He was also suspended for trying to encourage piracy after a mod specificity told him to stop encouraging piracy by basically saying screw you mod I'm going to do it anyway.

His final ban was for spamming abuse at the mods everywhere he could and demanding that he be issued an apology and given his Wild West access back because the mods had no right to treat him as they did.

Basically he kept poking the mods over and over again until they had enough.

I am 100% in favour of the mods banning him, as I think are most people. The issue seems to be the method he was dealt with and more specificity the removal of the pub club which no one knew was a possible punishment. I don't think for the most part people are complaining that Wynn was banned, I think if it had been a full ban with the piracy thing no one would have cared. Add that to a perceived lack of communication exacerbated by this new and unheard of punishment and you may be able to see why some people are worked up over this, whether you agree with it or not yourself.
 

Silentpony_v1legacy

Alleged Feather-Rustler
Jun 5, 2013
6,760
0
0
Bobular said:
So he was a dick who got what's coming to him. Fair enough. Why are there multiple threads (de)crying over it? No one posted 5 threads when I was suspended for calling someone a troll!
 

NewClassic_v1legacy

Bringer of Words
Jul 30, 2008
2,484
0
0
Fox12 said:
NewClassic said:
If you really cared about the site, you'd spend less time making these threads, and more time streamlining your thoughts so moderators could read through them quickly.

...

If you really want change, I'm happy for you, but public spectacles aren't the way to do it. They only ever waste time.

...

if you want to put up long-winded wanted posters about the moderation and administration under the veil of wanting "communication," then the only thing that you'll create for us is staff hours spent on nothing--time we'll never get back and a community that will feel empowered to keep demanding. If you want a moderation team that listens to you, think about the ramifications of your tone, structure, and argument. Make it as easy for us as possible so we can actually do stuff with it without long internal conversations and deviations

...

Whatever you want, there are countless better ways to do it.
It's a relief to know how much value the staff place on the community
I streamlined the post so you can read the highlights.

Now, instead of wasting yet more of my time by having to revisit the same topics, here are some more productive things you could be doing:

Check in with the community you're concerned for. You'll notice so many in this thread feel like this is unnecessary bloviating. Acknowledge that even if you disagree, this is the community too. I'm not here just for you, these are the community too. They likewise deserve my time, and threads like these take that away from them.

Concentrate your efforts. Pretending there's some magic "Do x, get praise" answer to complex moderation issues is, at best, condescending. You aren't doing anything by trying to score cheap shot points while feeling like it's making "a point." Instead, focus you energies into narrowing down your whys. Why do you feel like exacting, specific rules will be "better." Why are you so interested in other persons' bans? Figure out whatever x factor you think these details will solve for you, then come forward with that. "Because it's just better." isn't a reason we can work with.

Care. Right now, your snideness makes it seem like you don't really care, you just want to be validated and proven right. Good for you, but no one here cares but you and people who also want the same validation. However, there are hundreds of other users who all have wants from this forum. There are bots that need wrangling. There are pitches than need answering. Articles that need answering. Community documents to be written. Announcements to be worked on. All of these outside of snippy remarks that put people doing you a favor under you. We're already doing work, all I'm asking is that you pretend to do some too. Scoring points isn't work, and it's not working for anyone.
 

Pyrian

Hat Man
Legacy
Jul 8, 2011
1,399
8
13
San Diego, CA
Country
US
Gender
Male
RaikuFA said:
I dunno, I've seen a lot of times where someone can go into a thread starting shit for no reason other than to start shit and not get in trouble while others that do the same thing do get in trouble. There is an issue with favoritism on this site with the mods.
See, I read that and I immediately think you've got nothing. "...starting shit for no reason other than to start shit" just doesn't really mean anything. It's not against the rules to jump into a thread and disagree. It is against the rules to jump into a thread and insult someone. And they're not the same thing. But some people have a lot of difficulty distinguishing between them, because either way it's "starting shit for no reason".
 

Drathnoxis

Became a mass murderer for your sake
Legacy
Sep 23, 2010
5,468
1,916
118
Just off-screen
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Silentpony said:
Bobular said:
So he was a dick who got what's coming to him. Fair enough. Why are there multiple threads (de)crying over it? No one posted 5 threads when I was suspended for calling someone a troll!
Because you weren't banned over it. Also that was before the WW.
 

Trunkage

Nascent Orca
Legacy
Jun 21, 2012
8,697
2,881
118
Brisbane
Gender
Cyborg
Silentpony said:
Bobular said:
So he was a dick who got what's coming to him. Fair enough. Why are there multiple threads (de)crying over it? No one posted 5 threads when I was suspended for calling someone a troll!
I think the initial issue was that he broke the sites code and almost took everything down. I can't remember him being much more than an annoyance before that. He has been complaining about how bad the mods were for a year so there was probably another triggering event.
My last straw was the bluegate gate. Throwing your friend under a bus to prove your point got on my nerves.

Why don't you get 5 threads? Your are serious going to have to up your annoyance game. Some people find Zontar or Saelune annoying. They're not even on the same scale as Epyc. Those two get enough stupid fallout threads as it is. There are so many Epyc threads you aren't seeing

Also: To all those people who are interested in WW, it's the same as the other parts of the forum but you have to pay for it. Freedom of Speech has really changed anything
 

Callate

New member
Dec 5, 2008
5,118
0
0
As in so much related to the Internet these days, electing not to give a @#$% really does seem like the self-preserving, if not downright enlightened, course.

I think I read maybe two Wynn-dominated threads before I said, "Yeah... No." and decided I wasn't going to be bothered any more.

There are people who actually want to have a conversation, and there are people who merely think you're their audience, or sounding board, or the wall they bounce tennis balls (or occasionally, bowling balls) off of. Life is too short to waste time on the latter.
 

Warhound

New member
Oct 24, 2017
65
0
0
NewClassic said:
If you really cared about the site, you'd spend less time making these threads, and more time streamlining your thoughts so moderators could read through them quickly. Instead, every thousand words you make the administration read is another second they could be working on new content (irony at work, right?), answering messages from people who may actually have similar concerns but pick more direct venues for these thoughts, and spending less time paying attention to the usual malcontents who thrive in threads like these.
Honestly, if that "Gamers are still dead" 'article' is the kind of new content that is not being worked on by dealing with this, then we owe Armadox and Wynn the like a giant word of thanks.
 

Neverhoodian

New member
Apr 2, 2008
3,832
0
0
Can the OP change their avatar to something more palatable first? I'm not overly squeamish or anything, but I'd rather not have to see a human tongue bloodily impaled by a syringe if I can help it. The fact that it's been allowed to stay up for so long indicates to me that the mods are more lenient than the OP believes.

I dunno, I think folks need to take a step back and calm down. It's not that hard to avoid mod wrath; I've never had a single warning in all my years posting here, despite times when I've been highly critical of the site and its staff/contributors. At the same time, I think some of the mods are taking this too personally judging by the tone of their replies. I know it's a thankless and doubtless frustrating job at times, but it's generally a good idea to take the high road when wording a response.
 

Armadox

Mandatory Madness!
Aug 31, 2010
1,120
0
0
Neverhoodian said:
Can the OP change their avatar to something more palatable first? I'm not overly squeamish or anything, but I'd rather not have to see a human tongue bloodily impaled by a syringe if I can help it. The fact that it's been allowed to stay up for so long indicates to me that the mods are more lenient than the OP believes.
 

Neverhoodian

New member
Apr 2, 2008
3,832
0
0
Gauche said:

I appreciate the gesture. The problem is that I'm horrible at remembering usernames, to the point where I rely on avatars to recognize folks around here. Besides, I find most avatars to be benign or amusing, and I don't want to throw the baby out with the bath water because of one bad apple.
 

Armadox

Mandatory Madness!
Aug 31, 2010
1,120
0
0
Neverhoodian said:
Gauche said:

I appreciate the gesture. The problem is that I'm horrible at remembering usernames, to the point where I rely on avatars to recognize folks around here. Besides, I find most avatars to be benign or amusing, and I don't want to throw the baby out with the bath water because of one bad apple.
Darn... was editing the post

The feature hides an individuals avatar meaning other avatars will still show through